The Short Version: Trump and Climate Policy – A Comedy of Errors?
- Trump promises to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement if he gets back in the Oval Office.
- Experts warn that this could derail international climate cooperation faster than a politician at a buffet line.
- The fossil fuel industry is licking its chops, while environmentalists are probably fainting into their reusable shopping bags.
So, let’s set the stage. A dramatic showdown between Trump and climate change as if it were an episode of “Survivor: Earth Edition.” Trump has made it crystal clear: if he returns to power, he may very well pull the United States out of the Paris Agreement faster than you can say “greenhouse gases.” Oh, the irony is delicious! Over 194 countries, including the EU, are trying to save the world, while the US seems intent on burning the midnight oil—literally!
Stig Schjølset, a top-notch climate warrior at ZeroNorsk, warns of catastrophic effects on international conversations about climate change. And let’s face it, without the US at the table, discussion sessions will probably feel more like awkward dinner parties where no one knows how to break the ice—except Trump, of course, who might just suggest he’s got the ice at his golf course instead.
– The Great Deprioritization of Climate Cooperation
Niels Nagelhus Schia, an International Relations researcher at NUPI, stated that the likelihood of climate cooperation dropping like a hot potato under Trump isn’t just a wild guess—it’s pretty much a promise in neon lights. If he pulls the plug on the Paris Agreement, the negotiations lose their heavyweight contender—like expecting a boxing match without the champion. And between you and me, that’s just not as entertaining.
It appears that the White House won’t be playing tag with any other global powers when it comes to climate discussions, opting instead to focus on “America First!”—if by America, he means fossil fuel executives, well, at least they know who their president is!
“Drill, Baby, Drill” – The Catchphrase of the Century!
Trump’s rallying cry of “Drill, baby, drill!” echoes through the halls of power, and let’s be honest, it sounds like a rejected slogan from a toothpaste ad. He plans to dish out more fossil fuel extraction and regulatory rollbacks, earning some serious side-eye from the folks who actually believe in climate science.
With promises to dismantle everything Biden’s administration has built regarding climate policy—what he lovingly dubs “green fraud”—it’s clear that emissions could spike by four billion tonnes of CO2 by 2030. Yes, that’s right; his presidency could turn emissions levels into a horror movie where the bad guys always win!
Meanwhile, historian Douglas Brinkley has called Trump “the worst president for the environment in American history.” A second term? It’d be worse than a sequel to a bad movie—you know, the kind you watch when there’s nothing else on Netflix while half-watching for the snacks!
A Ray of Hope?
But wait! Karoline Andaur from WWF has thrown us a curveball, stating that it might not be a total blackout under Trump’s reign. She argues that significant investments in renewable energy might just survive amidst this chaos. Who knew that a storyline involving duality could be so… enlightening?
The bottom line? No matter how this plays out, the urgency for climate action is more pressing than ever. Countries like Norway must step up and lead the charge, because let’s face it, even if we drill for oil like it’s 1999, Mother Earth is still expecting us to turn off the lights before we leave the room!
What do you think? Can you imagine the ruckus that’ll ensue at COP29 if this president does what he promises? It’s like a game of poker, and the stakes are the entire planet’s future. Buckle up, folks; it’s going to be a wild ride!
The short version
- Trump pledges to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement if he secures re-election, which could have significant implications for global climate efforts.
- Experts Stig Schjølset from Zero and NUPI researcher Niels Nagelhus Schia caution about the detrimental impacts this withdrawal would impose on international climate cooperation.
- Trump’s renewed focus on fossil fuels, alongside a rollback of existing environmental regulations, has raised alarm bells among environmental advocacy groups.
Show more
– He is highly likely to initiate the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement, a landmark international framework designed to combat climate change and encourage sustainable practices. As of 7 July 2023, an impressive 194 countries, along with the European Union, have joined the Paris Agreement, according to the ZeroNorsk environmental organization, which advocates for a future built on zero emissions, as pointed out by their leader Stig Schjølset.
The potential ramifications of a U.S. withdrawal would not only diminish its role but also hinder its participation in ongoing crucial climate negotiations.
The upcoming climate summit, COP29, commencing in Baku, will serve as a platform for nations to deliberate and forge agreements on climate action strategies. It is vital for global collaboration to mitigate the escalating dangers of climate change.
– The influence of Trump’s presidency on the next four years could be monumental. His possible withdrawal from the Paris Agreement would severely weaken the negotiating framework, depriving global efforts of a crucial driving force, according to Schjølset.
– A successful climate negotiation process relies heavily on the engagement of the largest economies in the world. The absence of the United States could complicate participation from other nations, Schjølset notes.
– Climate cooperation will be de-prioritised
– During his campaign, Trump has repeatedly indicated a desire to extricate the United States from the Paris Agreement. If enacted, this departure would have far-reaching effects on international efforts aimed at combatting climate change, warns Niels Nagelhus Schia.
Schia, a research expert on global governance at the Norwegian Foreign Policy Institute (NUPI), foresees a period where international climate cooperation will be deprioritized under Trump’s administration.
Under Trump’s presidency, all forms of multilateral cooperation, especially in the realm of climate policy, will face stiff challenges, Schia emphasizes.
– Both Trump and his potential opponent Kamala Harris prioritize safeguarding American interests, but Trump’s strategies will significantly lean towards deterrence rather than collaborative approaches. This will likely signal a regression in climate initiatives, Schia emphasizes.
– His policies intend to vigorously protect and promote U.S. industries, which inherently conflict with the broader goals of international climate agreements, Schia adds.
«DRILL, BABY, DRILL»
Stig Schjølset expresses deep concern about the implications of Trump’s approach on the U.S. climate policy landscape.
Trump’s commitment to dismantling the climate policies implemented under Biden is alarming for sustainability advocates. He has branded these efforts as “green fraud,” a label that underscores a stark ideological divide regarding climate responsibility.
According to a study by Carbon Brief, if Trump acts on his promises, U.S. emissions could surge by an alarming four billion tonnes of CO2 by 2030.
This increase would equate to the total emissions produced by both the European Union and Japan combined.
Under President Biden, the U.S. government has set an ambitious goal of slashing greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52 percent by the year 2030. This ambitious agenda includes the groundbreaking Inflation Reduction Act, acknowledged as the most comprehensive federal climate-related legislation in the history of the United States.
In stark contrast, Trump considers investments in renewable energy as an imprudent allocation of taxpayer funds and has vowed to substantially diminish such financial commitments.
The rhetoric “Drill, baby, drill” reflects Trump’s campaign promises to escalate fossil fuel extraction while dismantling relevant regulatory frameworks.
Recent reports from The New York Times indicate Trump’s active recruitment of high-profile energy executives during the campaign, urging them to contribute $1 billion towards his candidacy to facilitate a reduction in environmental regulations.
Oil and gas entities have reportedly funneled an impressive $75 million into Trump’s campaign and various Republican-associated committees, underscoring the deep ties between the former president and the energy sector, as highlighted by the newspaper.
– Worst president for the environment
Douglas Brinkley, a noted presidential historian at Rice University, has articulated a grave assessment of Trump’s environmental record, asserting:
– Trump’s presidency is regarded as the most detrimental in American history regarding environmental policy. Should he secure a second term, the repercussions could be dire. He is determined to dismantle the green movement, reverting to a governance model heavily reliant on fossil fuels.
Trump’s prior engagement with the oil industry during his past presidency highlights a consistent agenda that favors traditional energy sources.
– It is important not to paint black
Karoline Andaur, Secretary General of WWF World Wildlife Fund, maintains a cautiously optimistic outlook.
Although there may be shifts in climate policy under the incoming administration, she emphasizes that it takes time for adaptation and change.
– The USA has made substantial strides by investing in renewable energy and green technologies, and there is hope that such momentum might continue. It will be critical to observe which specific changes the Trump administration prioritizes.
Karoline Andaur
Secretary General of the WWF World Wildlife Fund
– While the prospect of Trump resuming the presidency will undeniably impact climate negotiations and emissions, it is essential not to adopt an overly pessimistic outlook. Previous global mechanisms continued to function despite Trump’s earlier tenure, suggesting that there may still be avenues for climate action.
Andaur underscores the necessity for increased climate action from all nations amidst the intensifying climate crisis. She urges countries like Norway to assume a leadership role in this global endeavor.
Heading_1cz5q_1 layout-component layout-normal layout-padded”>- The Challenge of Climate Policy Under Trump
The looming prospect of a second Trump presidency raises significant concerns among environmentalists and climate advocates. His administration’s potential withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and a pivot back to fossil fuels may not only undermine U.S. efforts but also disrupt international climate agreements.
The implications of Trump’s climate policy would resonate beyond the U.S. borders, potentially leading to a global rollback in climate commitments as countries may find it challenging to pursue ambitious climate goals without U.S. involvement.
As the world increasingly grapples with the realities of climate change, the actions taken by the United States—one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases—will be crucial in shaping global climate initiatives. The coming years could prove decisive in determining the trajectory of such efforts, with Trump’s presidency possibly steering the nation further from collaborative approaches to climate sustainability.