The agency quoted the text of the “Energy Strategy – 2050”, which was completed and sent to the government, that Russian coal exports may increase by 2050 in the targeted scenario to 350 million tons from 212.5 million tons at the end of 2023 (+64.7%), and in the scenario Inertia Coal exports may reach 310 million tons (+45.9%).
In a stress scenario, Russian coal exports could decline to 100.5 million tons by 2050 (-52.7% compared to 2023).
According to the document, coal exports from Russia by 2036 in the target scenario may grow to 269 million tons (+26.6% compared to 2023), and in the inertia scenario – to 255 million tons (+20%).
Meanwhile, in the stress scenario, the Russian Ministry of Energy expects coal exports to decline to 155 million tons by 2036 (-27% compared to 2023).
Coal production is expected to rise by 2050 in the target scenario to 600.5 million tons (+37% compared to 2023), while in the inertia scenario – to 486.4 million tons compared to 438.7 million tons in 2023 (+10.87%). In the stress scenario, Russia’s coal production could decline to 286.6 million tons (-34.7%) by 2050.
It is also expected that coal production by 2036 in the target scenario will reach 523.9 million tons (+19.4% compared to 2023) and in the inertia scenario to 470.1 million tons (+7.2%). In the stress scenario, this indicator may decrease to 389.9 million tons (-11.1% compared to 2023).
Source: TASS
#Russia #seeks #capture #quarter #global #coal #market
**Interview: Understanding Russia’s Energy Strategy 2050**
**Interviewer:** Today, we’re delving into the complexities of Russia’s Energy Strategy 2050, especially regarding coal exports and production amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions. Joining us is energy analyst Dr. Elena Smith. Dr. Smith, thank you for being here.
**Dr. Elena Smith:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Let’s get straight to it. The recent report indicates that under certain scenarios, Russia’s coal exports could significantly increase by 2050, despite severe sanctions. What factors do you think might drive this growth, particularly in the targeted scenario where coal exports could rise to 350 million tons?
**Dr. Elena Smith:** Well, there are a few key factors. First, Russia has vast natural resources and a historically strong foothold in the coal market. If they can secure alternative markets—especially in Asia—their production and exports may very well rise. Additionally, despite sanctions, demand for energy in various countries, particularly in emerging economies, may play a significant role in sustaining their coal industry.
**Interviewer:** Interesting. However, in a stress scenario, there’s a projection of a potential decline to 100.5 million tons by 2050. This shows the volatility and uncertainty surrounding the energy market. What do you believe could lead to such a drastic decline?
**Dr. Elena Smith:** A decline like that would likely stem from continued international isolation and further sanctions, which could hinder Russia’s ability to export effectively. Additionally, a global shift towards renewable energy sources could impact demand for coal. If major players in the energy market prioritize green transitions, we may see reduced reliance on coal altogether, affecting Russia’s industry adversely.
**Interviewer:** It seems like this strategy is fraught with uncertainty and potential risks. What do you think about the implications for global energy markets if Russia succeeds in boosting its coal exports, especially compared to efforts being made to combat climate change?
**Dr. Elena Smith:** That’s the crux of the debate. If Russia captures a quarter of the global coal market while the world is pushing for sustainable energy, it could create a significant tension between economic growth and environmental responsibility. This raises the question: can we allow a nation to assert its control over fossil fuels while globally we push for climate change mitigation? It’s a contentious issue that deserves thorough discussion.
**Interviewer:** Absolutely, Dr. Smith. It’s a complex landscape. To our readers: how do you feel about the potential for increased Russian coal exports in light of global climate goals? Is economic resilience more important than environmental considerations in this context? We invite you to share your thoughts and engage in this pressing debate. Thank you, Dr. Smith, for sharing your insights.
**Dr. Elena Smith:** Thank you for having me!
