2024-11-09 13:30:00
After months of supporters blocking the route and launching various attacks on the government of Luis Arce to get him to agree to “negotiations”, Bolivia’s Plurinational Constitutional Court (TCP) on Friday finally approved former president Evo Mora Rice (2006-2019) can no longer contest next year’s elections in neighboring countries.
In a fatal blow for Morales, who was also facing serious criminal proceedings, President Luis Arce celebrated the verdict, noting that Morales had “driven a brutal campaign against the government simply because He wants a new candidacy that would give him “impunity” for his issue of “justice.”
The TCPO determined that Evo had completed the period in power allowed by the Bolivian constitution and therefore legally excluded him from a new candidacy due to the validity of the law “even if the two periods are consecutive or discontinuous”.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
The decision became official this Friday through the Constitutional Order No. 0083/2024 ECA issued by the Fourth Special Chamber of the TCP in response to the request for amendment and clarification of the Plurinational Constitutional Judgment No. 1010/2023-S4 of December 28. . The request was made by Deputies Jose Carlos Gutierrez Vargasin the amparo lawsuit filed by lawyer Miguel Ángel Balcázar Ruiz against the President of the Plurinational Legislative Assembly, David Choquehuanca.
Bolivia crisis escalates, Evo Morales begins hunger strike
“The term of office of the representatives of the State will be governed by the above-mentioned constitutional rules, allowing the exercise of the above-mentioned functions in the legislative, executive and judicial bodies for two similar periods, whether continuous or discontinuous, and without the possibility of extending them into the term Finish.
In light of this ruling, the TCP approved its Ruling No. 1010/2023, which stipulates that the authority of Evo Morales and any other national, departmental or municipal office shall be limited to a maximum of two consecutive terms, whether consecutive or intermittent.
Morales, He ruled the country uninterrupted for nearly 14 yearsAnd his followers persisted by any means, even violently blocking roads for nearly a month in an attempt to force the new president out of the possibility of re-election.
Description by opposition representative José Carlos Gutiérrez “historical” TCP decisions, This completely closes the door to Morales’ new presidential candidacy. The ruling also affects other politicians who already hold elected office, limiting their ability to seek those positions again.
Not applicable/HB
1731161848
#Evo #Morales #continue #participating #Bolivias #justice #approves #rejection #candidacy
**Interview with Dr. Ana Torres, Political Analyst on the Recent Developments Surrounding Evo Morales**
**Editor**: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Torres. Let’s dive right in. The recent ruling by Bolivia’s Plurinational Constitutional Court excludes Evo Morales from contesting the upcoming elections. How significant is this decision for the political landscape in Bolivia?
**Dr. Torres**: Thank you for having me. This ruling is monumental. It symbolizes a definitive legal stance against Morales, reinforcing the constitutional limits placed on presidential terms. Without Morales in the running, it opens the door for new leadership and could change the dynamics significantly. His political influence has been considerable, but this decision might destabilize his support base.
**Editor**: Speaking of influence, Morales’ supporters have been quite active, with protests and blockades leading to unrest. What does this say about his remaining supporters’ commitment to his cause?
**Dr. Torres**: Morales’ supporters are demonstrating a level of dedication and frustration. They feel marginalized by the current administration, especially following the court’s ruling. However, the ongoing unrest presents a double-edged sword; while it shows their commitment, it could also alienate moderate supporters who favor stability over protests.
**Editor**: President Luis Arce characterized Morales’ recent actions as a “brutal campaign” for impunity. How does this affect public perception of both leaders?
**Dr. Torres**: That characterization by Arce certainly frames Morales as self-serving in the eyes of opponents, emphasizing his desire to evade legal consequences. Public perception is crucial here; if people start viewing Morales not just as a former president but as someone seeking personal gain, it could tarnish his legacy. Conversely, Arce’s tough stance might solidify his support among those who prioritize law and order.
**Editor**: Given the court’s decision and the political unrest, what do you foresee as the next steps for both Morales and the Arce administration?
**Dr. Torres**: Morales may attempt to reposition himself as a defender of the indigenous population and workers’ rights, possibly leveraging international support to maintain his relevance. On the other hand, the Arce administration must navigate the unrest while addressing the needs of Morales’ supporters. They should seek dialogue to avoid further instability and explore policies that resonate with those feeling disenfranchised.
**Editor**: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insights on this unfolding situation. It’s a critical moment for Bolivia, and we will be watching closely to see how these dynamics evolve.
**Dr. Torres**: Thank you for having me. It is indeed a pivotal moment for the nation.
