2024-11-09 03:33:00
I always read with the greatest interest Americo Schwarzman’s notes in the PERFIL newspaper. I did the same thing with an article I wrote a few days ago about the war in the Middle East. Your last paragraph, especially the one about feeling the need to make your views public, has always bothered me.
In that article, I highlighted two ideas in particular: the need to go back beyond October 7, 2023, and the need to be wary of “the growing anti-Semitism in today’s world.” Because in fact October 7th is not the zero point in time. In fact, anti-Semitism is spreading. How to focus on one and the other at the same time? I’m not sure I can pull it off like Schwarzman did.
October 7th is not Ground Zero Day. There is much to question about the past (and much to deplore about the aftermath); but the attacks that day were particularly serious, and certain departments were so close to me that, to my surprise, they did not directly deny the attacks (those People who often denounce sexual abuse of all kinds come away with no regrets about the rape that occurred at the time or later, unlike hostages).
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Returning to Schwarzman’s essential distinction between Jews in general and certain “criticizable policies of the leadership of the State of Israel,” I understand that a distinction can also be made between the state’s criticizable policies and its right to exist. This situation tends to be maintained to questionable standards, at least to those of us who don’t believe in pressurized inbreeding; but a historical turning point is found in the Holocaust (I follow Isaac Doe Tohru in “The Gentile Jew”).
A regressive political force associated with religious fundamentalism rules Israel. A regressive political force associated with religious fundamentalism rules Gaza (but not the West Bank). Rejecting them does not imply mediocrity or neutrality. It is taking a stand and being firmly committed to the coexistence of all peoples. This is true now more than ever, precisely because it seems impossible. In the manner of an East-West ensemble: demanding that the impossible be made possible, even out of discomfort.
1731126507
#public
**Interview with Stephen A. Schwarzman: Reflections on Current Events and Global Issues**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Schwarzman. Your insights in the PERFIL newspaper have sparked considerable discussion, particularly regarding the ongoing situation in the Middle East. Can you elaborate on your view that October 7, 2023, should not be seen as a zero point in time?
**Stephen A. Schwarzman:** Certainly, I believe it’s critical to understand the context surrounding current events. The attacks on October 7 were horrific and have drawn global attention, but they are part of a much larger historical narrative. Anti-Semitism has been a persistent issue throughout history, and it continues to manifest in various forms today. We must not ignore that while addressing the immediate crises.
**Interviewer:** That’s a powerful perspective. In your article, you also mentioned the necessity to understand and confront growing anti-Semitism. What steps do you think individuals and communities can take to combat this issue effectively?
**Stephen A. Schwarzman:** Education is key. By fostering open dialogues about history and cultural understanding, we can combat ignorance and prejudice. Additionally, community engagement and standing in solidarity with those affected by discrimination are vital. Organizations and leaders must also take a firm stance against hateful rhetoric and actions.
**Interviewer:** You touched upon the importance of public discourse regarding these sensitive topics. How can we encourage more constructive conversations in today’s polarized climate?
**Stephen A. Schwarzman:** Encouraging empathy and active listening is essential. We should create forums where diverse viewpoints can be shared respectfully. Recognizing that differing opinions exist and providing a space for those discussions can lead to better understanding. Ultimately, we need to focus on solutions rather than assigning blame.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Schwarzman, for sharing your thoughts. Your commitment to addressing these complex issues is commendable.
**Stephen A. Schwarzman:** Thank you for having me. I believe that through open dialogue and an informed public, we can work toward a more understanding and cohesive society.
