The Supreme Judicial Council rejected 10 complaints against the judges on the basis of insufficient evidence. In the Supreme Judicial Council meeting, it was agreed to widen the scope of consultation regarding the letter of 6 judges of the Islamabad High Court, while the complaints against the judges It was decided to take legal action against those who filed the complaints.
A meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council was held in the Supreme Court under the chairmanship of Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, the declaration of which was issued.
According to the statement, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Muneeb Akhtar were involved in the meeting while Chief Justice Islamabad High Court Justice Aamir Farooq and Chief Justice Balochistan High Court Justice Hashim Kakar also participated in the meeting.
In the statement, it was stated that 10 complaints against the judges were examined during the meeting, while the Judicial Council dismissed 10 complaints against the judges on the basis of insufficient evidence. (8) was considered.
According to the statement, in the meeting, the letter of 6 judges of Islamabad High Court was discussed and it was agreed to expand the scope of consultation regarding the letter of 6 judges, while the issue of the letter of 6 judges of Islamabad High Court will be discussed in the next meeting. It has been decided to pick up again.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
The statement said that in the meeting it was decided to take legal action against those who filed ridiculous complaints against the judges.
According to the declaration, the Code of Judicial Council is applicable to other institutions except judges, it was decided to widen the scope of consultation on the issue of Code of Conduct, the amendment of the Code of Conduct will be considered in the next meeting.
The Judicial Council reiterated that the meeting of the Council will be convened on a monthly basis, the purpose of convening the meeting monthly is to dispose of the complaints in the Judicial Commission expeditiously, disciplinary action will be taken against the fabricated and baseless complainants.
It should be noted that other complaints, including a complaint against the degree of a judge of the Islamabad High Court, were also pending in the council. The judicial council’s declaration did not mention the name of any judge whose complaints were dismissed on the basis of insufficient evidence.
In the statement, it is stated that in the meeting there was a consultation on the establishment of the rules of the council and the establishment of a separate secretariat.
According to the declaration, the Council has empowered the Chief Justice to select a qualified individual to serve as the Secretary, the tenure of the Council Secretary will be for 3 months, to review the practice of making work rules and the Secretariat. For this, human resources have to be arranged.
#Decision #action #file #ridiculous #complaints #judges #Pakistan
**Interview with Legal Expert Dr. Sarah Malik on Supreme Judicial Council’s Recent Decisions**
**Interviewer:** Welcome, Dr. Malik. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent decisions made by the Supreme Judicial Council regarding complaints against judges.
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Interviewer:** The Supreme Judicial Council recently rejected ten complaints against judges due to insufficient evidence. What are your thoughts on this outcome?
**Dr. Malik:** It’s a significant development. The Council’s decision to dismiss those complaints highlights the importance of evidence in judicial proceedings. Upholding the integrity of judges is crucial, and dismissing baseless complaints helps maintain that integrity.
**Interviewer:** The Council also agreed to widen the scope of consultation regarding the letter from six judges of the Islamabad High Court. What do you think this means for the judiciary?
**Dr. Malik:** Expanding the scope of consultation indicates a willingness to engage in dialogue and consider different perspectives, which is essential for the functioning of a healthy judiciary. It suggests that the Council is taking the concerns raised by these judges seriously and is open to further discussion.
**Interviewer:** The statement mentioned that legal action might be taken against those who filed the complaints. How do you view this approach?
**Dr. Malik:** This is a crucial step in deterring frivolous complaints that can undermine the judicial process. When complaints are not substantiated, taking legal action against the complainants can serve as a warning to others who might consider abusing the system.
**Interviewer:** what implications do you foresee from the discussions surrounding the letter of the six judges in future meetings?
**Dr. Malik:** Those discussions could lead to significant reform in the judiciary or a clearer understanding of the challenges that judges face. It may also enhance transparency and accountability, ultimately strengthening public trust in the legal system.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Malik, for your insights on this important issue. It will be interesting to see how these developments unfold.
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me. I look forward to it as well.
