Former President Trump’s recent threats regarding mass deportations have sparked a wave of concern and uncertainty in Canada, particularly regarding the implications for the long-shared northern border between the two nations.
Terri Givens, a recognized professor of political science at the University of British Columbia, emphasized that even the mere announcement of such deportations could create a significant “issue of perception,” potentially motivating individuals to attempt to cross the Canadian border in search of safety and stability.
In 2017, the situation escalated as thousands of desperate individuals began making their way into Canada at Roxham Road, a known unofficial access point along the New York-Quebec border, with the intent of seeking asylum from uncertain futures.
The motivations behind this surge in crossings were varied, as many prospective asylum seekers expressed genuine fears about their ability to remain in the United States during the first Trump presidency, alongside a prevailing belief that Canada would offer them a more welcoming environment.
While Canada and the United States have since addressed and closed a loophole in their border agreement that previously allowed asylum seekers to cross at unofficial points, recent US data indicates that individuals are still attempting to make the dangerous journey.
Speaking on the issue, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland reassured citizens by stating that there is indeed a comprehensive plan in place to monitor and manage border security.
“I do want to assure Canadians that we absolutely do recognise the importance of border security and control of the border,” she affirmed, instilling a sense of confidence among the populace.
Addressing the complexities of maintaining an effective border policy, experts warn that resolution will necessitate close collaboration between Canadian and US officials, particularly given that the extensive 5,525 miles (8,891 km) border remains largely undefended.
“How do you actually enforce that border?” questioned Julie Young, a prominent Canada Research Chair in Critical Border Studies and an associate professor at the University of Lethbridge, highlighting the challenges faced by authorities.
“And my concern is for the people whose lives will be endangered by how border policies are enforced,” she added, underscoring the human cost of stringent border control measures.
**Interview with Professor Terri Givens on Immigration Concerns Following Trump’s Deportation Promises**
**Host:** Welcome, Terri Givens, a political science professor at the University of British Columbia. Thank you for joining us today.
**Terri Givens:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. Former President Trump’s recent threats of mass deportations have raised alarms in Canada. How do you think this announcement is affecting public perception in Canada?
**Terri Givens:** The announcements create a significant “issue of perception.” Even without any immediate action, the fear and uncertainty can drive individuals who feel threatened in the U.S. to seek refuge in Canada. It’s important to recognize that the fear of deportation can lead to a surge in border crossings as people look for safety and stability.
**Host:** You mentioned a historical context around this issue. Can you elaborate on what happened in 2017 and how it relates to the current situation?
**Terri Givens:** Certainly. In 2017, following similar political rhetoric in the U.S., we saw a notable increase in asylum seekers entering Canada through Roxham Road, an unofficial crossing. Thousands of individuals, fearing for their futures under U.S. immigration policies, sought asylum in Canada. That surge highlighted how political climate and presidential announcements can directly impact immigration patterns.
**Host:** What are the potential implications for Canada if we see another spike in border crossings?
**Terri Givens:** A significant increase in arrivals could strain local resources and immigration systems. It would require coordinated responses from federal and provincial governments to ensure that processing and support for these individuals are managed effectively. Moreover, it might also prompt discussions about immigration policy and refugee support frameworks in Canada, which could lead to broader societal conversations about inclusion and humanitarian responsibilities.
**Host:** Given the current political climate, what steps can Canada take to prepare for a potential rise in border crossings?
**Terri Givens:** Proactive measures are essential. Canada could enhance communication between local governments and border authorities, streamline asylum application processes, and ensure support services for newcomers are in place. Additionally, it’s crucial for the public discourse to frame these individuals not just as numbers, but as people in need, which could foster a more welcoming environment.
**Host:** Thank you, Terri. Your insights provide a clearer understanding of the potential challenges and responses related to immigration as rhetoric heats up. We appreciate your time.
**Terri Givens:** Thank you for having me. It’s an important discussion we need to continue.
