“Despite the obvious procedural irregularities, which were intended to discourage participation, people participated normally in the ballot box and Mr. Kasselakis clearly won. The narrative of the party’s nomenclature about its overwhelming victory is not valid at all and is even refuted by a simple argument: why do they need the Legalization Commission? Why don’t they announce which delegates were elected?” stated the Theodora Tzakri after what happened over the weekend ahead of the Congress in SYRIZA-PS, speaking of “unprecedented events” with the non-announcement of the numbers of voters.
In fact, he complained: “Two of our officers yesterday made a surprise visit to Koumoundourou and found that KOES members and office workers had opened the minutes of the executive committees and were working out on their own how to cut delegates and how to cripple the association of the Congress with certificates social attitudes. In fact, a member of the Political Secretariat said “tell Stefanakos that we will not go to the Congress with those he selected, but with those we want”. That’s how they cook the results.”
At the same time, he characterized the majority as one “ruthless bureaucracy attempting to end it by ruthless means, acting as an emergency court-martial”.
“These methods are reminiscent of the Soviet Union before the fall of the Wall 4 years ago and are not consistent with the Official Opposition party. Despite this, we will win the Congress, after all, there is also the proposal of the referendum on the table. The statute gives us other possibilities.”
#Ruthless #bureaucracy #cooks #result #SYRIZA
**Interview with Theodora Tzakri, Member of SYRIZA-PS**
**Interviewer:** Theodora, you’ve described the recent events at SYRIZA as “unprecedented” and indicative of a “ruthless bureaucracy.” Can you elaborate on what you believe these actions say about the current state of democracy within the party?
**Tzakri:** Absolutely. The actions taken by the majority in the party reflect a severe deviation from democratic principles. It’s concerning when procedural irregularities become so blatant that they discourage participation. Instead of fostering an open dialogue, we see a group attempting to manipulate the results to maintain control.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned comparisons to the Soviet Union and called the majority’s actions reminiscent of an “emergency court-martial.” Do you think these tactics will ultimately backfire and lead to a shift in power within the party?
**Tzakri:** I believe the majority’s coercive methods will erode trust among members. If we continue down this path, disillusionment may grow, prompting factions within SYRIZA to rally against the central leadership.
**Interviewer:** Critics may argue that demanding transparency and fairness could jeopardize the party’s unity at this critical moment. How do you respond to those concerns?
**Tzakri:** While I understand the importance of unity, it cannot come at the cost of our core democratic values. True unity is built on trust and transparency. If members feel the process is rigged, unity will be superficial and fragile.
**Interviewer:** You’re advocating for a referendum as a means to regain control. Do you think that’s the best path forward, and what do you see as the potential consequences of it?
**Tzakri:** A referendum could empower the members and provide a clear mandate moving forward. However, its success hinges on overcoming the fear and manipulation from the current leadership. If executed properly, it could rejuvenate the party and bring about meaningful change.
**Interviewer:** Given these tensions, what do you think the future holds for SYRIZA, and how do you see your role in that future?
**Tzakri:** If we can navigate this crisis successfully, I see a renewed SYRIZA that actually reflects the will of its members. My role will be to advocate for transparency and inclusivity, ensuring every voice is heard.
**Debate Question for Readers:** Do you believe internal party politics in SYRIZA should prioritize transparency over unity, or is there a risk that insisting on transparency could further fracture the party? What are your thoughts?
