Rudy Giuliani is making headlines once again, brazenly showcasing his prized possessions in public while openly challenging a court’s directives. On Tuesday, as a display of nonchalance, the Republican lawyer arrived to cast his vote in the US presidential election, cruising in his luxurious and eye-catching 1980 Mercedes-Benz SL500 convertible.
The situation has escalated, as Judge Lewis Liman has explicitly commanded Giuliani to surrender this vehicle, along with a host of other valuable items, in an order reported by NBC News. The items are intended to help satisfy the staggering $146 million judgment Giuliani owes to two election workers whose reputations he tarnished through false claims.
Interestingly, this particular vintage car isn’t just any automobile; it previously belonged to the legendary actress Lauren Bacall, adding an element of historical intrigue to Giuliani’s daring act. Furthermore, the once-trusted lawyer for President-elect Donald Trump was officially given until October 22 to divest himself of the Mercedes, as well as other significant assets, including cash accounts, jewelry, and memorabilia from the New York Yankees.
Despite these legal obstacles, Giuliani still hasn’t relinquished his treasured assets, as confirmed by Aaron Nathan, the attorney representing defamed election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss. Nathan has asserted that Giuliani and his legal team have not only refused to provide essential information regarding the whereabouts of most of the property under court order but have also been evasive regarding the location of the Mercedes and other high-value items.
Ted Goodman, Giuliani’s spokesperson, attributed the misunderstandings regarding the car to a lack of communication. He mentioned that the legal team has been attempting to obtain the necessary documentation to transfer the vehicle’s title but has yet to receive a response from the opposing counsel.
Given Giuliani’s evident disregard for Judge Liman’s orders and his continued retention of these contested possessions, the judge has called for his presence at a New York City court on November 7, marking yet another chapter in Giuliani’s tumultuous legal saga.
The post Rudy Giuliani Rolled Up to Vote in a Mercedes He Was Ordered to Surrender 2 Weeks Ago appeared first on VICE.
**Interview with Political Analyst Jennifer Hayes on Rudy Giuliani’s Latest Controversy**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Jennifer. Rudy Giuliani is making headlines yet again, this time for showing off his luxurious Mercedes-Benz despite a court order to surrender it as part of a judgment against him. What are your thoughts on this display of defiance?
**Jennifer Hayes:** Thank you for having me! Rudy Giuliani has always had a flair for the dramatic, and this incident is no exception. It seems to encapsulate both his personality and his current legal troubles. By parading around in such a high-profile vehicle, especially one with a celebrity pedigree, he’s perhaps attempting to maintain a public image of wealth and influence, despite the significant legal setbacks he faces.
**Interviewer:** Yes, the Mercedes-Benz SL500 isn’t just any car; it once belonged to Lauren Bacall. Do you think this adds another layer to the story?
**Jennifer Hayes:** Absolutely. The car’s history ties Giuliani to a sense of glamour and nostalgia, which might appeal to some of his supporters. It’s almost as if he’s trying to align himself with Hollywood royalty during a time when his legal standing is increasingly precarious. For some, it could serve as a distraction from the more serious implications of his situation.
**Interviewer:** Judge Lewis Liman has explicitly instructed him to surrender this vehicle due to a hefty judgment against him. What kind of message do you think Giuliani is sending by ignoring this order?
**Jennifer Hayes:** It sends a dual message. On one hand, it’s a blatant disregard for the legal system, which could be interpreted as a show of bravado. On the other hand, it might resonate with those who view him as a political outsider challenging the establishment. However, defying a court order could have serious repercussions, both legally and in terms of public perception.
**Interviewer:** With Giuliani’s history as the former mayor of New York City and his current disbarred status, how do you think this affects his legacy?
**Jennifer Hayes:** Giuliani’s legacy is complex. He was once celebrated as “America’s mayor” during and after 9/11, but this recent series of legal troubles and public displays of defiance may overshadow his earlier accomplishments. His current path seems to evoke more questions about accountability and ethics, reshaping how future generations will view him.
**Interviewer:** So, in your opinion, what’s next for Giuliani?
**Jennifer Hayes:** That’s tough to say. If he continues to ignore court orders, he could face more severe legal consequences, including possible sanctions or jail time. Alternatively, he might leverage this controversy to galvanize his base, portraying himself as a victim of political persecution. Ultimately, how this unfolds will depend on both the legal actions taken against him and his responses to those actions.
**Interviewer:** A fascinating perspective, Jennifer. Thank you for your insights on this evolving story!
**Jennifer Hayes:** My pleasure! It’ll be interesting to watch how this plays out in the coming weeks.
