The capture of the co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel, Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada (last July 25) has caused a drug war that is leaving many dead not only in Sinaloa, but in several regions of Mexico, according to experts in drug trafficking issues due to the dispute over territories, but also to exact revenge for the alleged kidnapping of the boss.
Added to that, a barrage of tell and talk between Attorney General’s Office of the Republic (FGR) and the United States ambassador to Mexico, Ken Salazar.
And it is that after the owner of the FGR, Alejandro Gertz Manero blamed the US for lack of information and asked for explanations for the arrest of the co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel, the ambassador of the neighboring country said “surprised” about what The Mexican government does not celebrate the capture of the drug trafficker.
“Me I’m so surprised that you can’t say: victory of the people of Mexico, victory of the United States, result of the work we have carried out in the last three years.”
Ken Salazar on the capture of “El Mayo” Zambada
Ken Salazar answered that yesterday, Tuesday, September 29, during a press conference at the new american embassyin response to the FGR’s demand for information regarding the capo’s arrest, after the Mexican president’s morning conference, Claudia Sheinbaumhe attorney general intervened to request information about the ddocumentation of the aircraft in which the capo arrived to USA
But Ken Salazar’s response made it clearer that Mexico has no control over the issue of security, because if it left this country, the government should know who flies in Mexican territory and turned around:
“No police operation was carried out in Mexico. It was not our plane, nor our pilot, nor our people,” said the ambassador.
Ken Salazar.
Before these statements by Ken Salazar that reveal a government without control of what happens in the country on security issuesthe FGR responded with a statement today Wednesday October 30.
The agency says again that since last August Mexico requested information from the US authorities about the case “El Mayo” Zambada directly, through Interpol and international legal assistance, and continues to wait.
Although previously Ken Salazar assured that the US government has had communication with the FGR and there is at least 5 cards between the prosecutor of his country Merrick Garland and the Mexican prosecutor Alejandro Gertz Manero.
However, this Wednesday the FGR insisted in a bulletin that he has requested For ten weeks now, all the documentation related to the arrival to El Paso, Texas, of the aeronave Beechcraft 200“with a cloned license plate, in which three people were on board: the unidentified pilot, as well as Ismael “Z” and Joaquín “G”; and whose immigration, customs and aeronautical documentation for all of them has not been provided by the North American authorities.”
#FGRInforma | In the context of the presidential conference and in response to a specific question from a journalist, the Head of this Institution reported and reiterated the progress in the investigation of the Ismael “Z” case. (1/6) pic.twitter.com/iK81AKX5cX
— FGR México (@FGRMexico) October 30, 2024
The FGR says that the total information on the cloning of the aircraft has not been established either, the pilot’s name who crewed the aircraft and the complete documentation that should have proven his identification, as well as his qualification as an authorized pilot.
Therefore, the FGR stated that it will continue waiting for said information, which was requested from the United States government since the month of August 2024.
Related
#case #Mayo #Zambada
**Interview with Dr. Jorge Martinez, Drug Trafficking Expert**
**Editor:** Welcome, Dr. Martinez. The recent capture of Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada has caused significant upheaval in Mexico’s drug landscape. What can you tell us about the ramifications of his arrest?
**Dr. Martinez:** Thank you for having me. Zambada’s capture has indeed intensified violence, not just in Sinaloa but across multiple regions. The Sinaloa Cartel is known for its territorial disputes, and with Zambada out of the picture, rival factions are vying for control, leading to brutal confrontations. The situation is fluid, and we might see increased bloodshed as competing groups retaliate or attempt to fill the power vacuum.
**Editor:** We’ve seen reactions from U.S. and Mexican officials, particularly between Ken Salazar and Alejandro Gertz Manero. What does this say about the relationship between the two countries regarding drug enforcement?
**Dr. Martinez:** The exchange highlighted a serious communication gap and differing perceptions about cooperation. Salazar’s surprise at the lack of celebration in Mexico indicates a disconnect in how victories are viewed. While the U.S. seems eager to frame this as a joint victory, Mexico appears more concerned with the implications on its sovereignty and control over its territory. The statements from both sides shed light on the complexities of their partnership in the fight against drug trafficking.
**Editor:** Speaking of control, Salazar emphasized that no police operation facilitated Zambada’s capture in Mexico. What does this imply about Mexico’s security situation?
**Dr. Martinez:** It raises considerable concerns. Salazar’s comments reflect a reality where the Mexican government struggles to maintain control over its own territory. If the U.S. can apprehend high-profile criminals without assistance, it suggests that Mexico lacks the necessary oversight in security matters. This scenario can undermine public confidence in the government’s ability to combat organized crime effectively.
**Editor:** The Mexican government has publicly criticized the U.S. for its lack of information sharing regarding Zambada’s case. How critical is this kind of collaboration for addressing drug trafficking?
**Dr. Martinez:** Collaboration is vital. Effective drug enforcement requires timely information sharing and joint operations to dismantle trafficking networks. If trust erodes between the two nations, it can hamper progress and lead to further complications in addressing drug-related violence. Both sides must work towards transparent communication and coordinated action to make a meaningful impact.
**Editor:** As we stay tuned to developments, what should we be watching for in the coming weeks regarding this situation?
**Dr. Martinez:** We should closely monitor the violence trends in Mexico, particularly in Sinaloa and surrounding areas, as well as any shifts in cartel dynamics. Additionally, any enhancements in cooperation or public statements from U.S. and Mexican officials could signal changes in their approach. The situation is evolving rapidly, and these will be key indicators of what comes next.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Martinez, for your insights on this pressing issue. It’s certainly a complex landscape shaped by both local and international dynamics.
**Dr. Martinez:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss these critical topics.
