2024-11-06 00:29:00
The municipality of Villa El Chocón installed the radar on National Highway 237, one of the busiest routes for tourists, residents and the entire economy to Neuquen and the Rio Negro Mountains, The bill was withdrawn after fierce controversy over its validity.
The commune confirmed the news to Diario RÍO NEGRO, following the decree issued by the review committee in order for the administration to return to the measure and proceed with the removal of the device.
According to information provided by provincial representative Gissell Stillger, who contacted the outlet days ago saying the device was illegal, The withdrawal occurred on October 28.
Members of the Legislative Council at that time Neighbors urged not to pay fines A plan to end the use of road radar was presented to the Giocon City Council.
Until last week, at kilometer 1299, this stretch of road separated the town’s two main neighbourhoods. As a “city trip”, the top speed is therefore 60 km/h.
Route 237 Radar: Fine up to 500,000 pesos
At the time of installation, the city reported that violations would occur if speed limits were not followed, For example, a driver’s subsidy may amount to 500,000 pesos.
Stilger disputed that the device was not approved, arguing that the requirement was crucial under National Traffic Code No. 24,449 and National Traffic Code No. 26,363, which regulate control devices on national highways installation and use.
The operation was carried out in the presence of policeand also received assistance from the city’s legal department.
1730853321
#dismantled #radar #Route #Neuquén #caused #controversy #huge #fines
**Short Interview with Gissell Stillger, Provincial Representative**
**Interviewer:** Gissell, thank you for joining us today. Could you explain the recent controversy surrounding the radar on National Highway 237 in Villa El Chocón?
**Gissell Stillger:** Thank you for having me. The radar was installed on one of our busiest routes, which is crucial for both tourism and local economy. However, there was significant backlash regarding its validity as a traffic enforcement tool. Many residents and visitors were concerned about the fines being issued through this radar.
**Interviewer:** What led to the decision to withdraw the bill and remove the radar?
**Gissell Stillger:** After extensive discussions with the community and stakeholders, the review committee issued a decree confirming that the administration needed to evaluate the legality of the radar’s operation. The overwhelming response from the public highlighted that many believed these fines were unjust, which ultimately led us to push for its removal.
**Interviewer:** How do you think this situation affects the relationship between the municipality and its residents?
**Gissell Stillger:** I believe it has opened a vital dialogue. It’s important for local governance to be transparent, and this situation underscores the need for community involvement in decision-making. We aim to rebuild trust and ensure that future measures are well-communicated and agreed upon.
**Interviewer:** What’s next for the municipality regarding traffic enforcement on National Highway 237?
**Gissell Stillger:** We are currently exploring alternative traffic safety measures that align better with public sentiment. Our focus will be on enhancing road safety without compromising the trust of the residents or visitors.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, Gissell. We appreciate your time.
**Gissell Stillger:** Thank you! I look forward to keeping the community informed as we move forward.
