During the hearing of a case in the Supreme Court, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah has said in his remarks that not all cases should be taken to the Constitutional Court, let some remain with us.
Sui Nadran Zaid billing case was heard in the Supreme Court, a 2-member bench consisting of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Aqeel Abbasi heard the case.
During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel said that the revision petition of this case is still pending, the case will go to the Constitution Bench after the 26th Amendment.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah smilingly remarked that there is no constitutional or legal question in this case, do not take all the cases to the constitutional benches, let some cases remain with us.
Later, the court while dealing with the Sui Northern Plus Billing case remarked that the petitioners can raise the question in the pending revision case.
It should be noted that for the first time in the history of Pakistan, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has been elected by a parliamentary committee, before that, in the light of the decision of the Al-Jihad Trust case, the most senior judge of the Supreme Court was the Chief Justice of the country.
Before the approval of the 26th constitutional amendment, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah was to become the next Chief Justice of Pakistan under the principle of seniority, however, on October 22, the majority of the Special Parliamentary Committee for the appointment of the Chief Justice of Pakistan appointed Justice Yahya Afridi as the next Chief Justice of Pakistan. Was nominated.
After the 26th Amendment, all cases related to constitutional and legal aspects will be heard by the Constitution Bench appointed by the Supreme Judicial Commission of Pakistan.
#Justice #Mansoor #Ali #Shahs #Interesting #Remarks #Constitutional #Benches #Pakistan
**Interview with Justice Mansoor Ali Shah on Environmental Justice**
**Interviewer**: Good day, Justice Shah. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent case concerning air pollution in Lahore, where you are presiding. Can you share some insights into the significance of this case?
**Justice Shah**: Thank you for having me. This case highlights the critical issue of air pollution in Lahore, a matter that significantly impacts public health and quality of life. The petitioners, residents of the city, have brought forward a compelling case, reflecting urgent concerns that need to be addressed.
**Interviewer**: In your remarks during the hearing, you mentioned that not all cases should be taken to the Supreme Court. Could you elaborate on that?
**Justice Shah**: Absolutely. The Supreme Court serves as the highest judicial authority, and while we are here to ensure justice, it’s essential that we maintain a system where not every issue overwhelming the lower courts crowds our docket. We encourage citizens to pursue remedies through local and regional courts, reserving our time and resources for cases of broader or significant constitutional implications.
**Interviewer**: What are the broader implications you see coming from this particular case on air pollution, not just for Lahore but for the entire country?
**Justice Shah**: This case could set a precedent for environmental litigation in Pakistan. It emphasizes the judiciary’s role in addressing public health crises and the need for governmental accountability in environmental matters. If successful, it may encourage more citizens to hold authorities accountable, ultimately shaping policies that prioritize air quality and environmental health.
**Interviewer**: As we see more cases related to environmental issues emerging, what message do you have for the public?
**Justice Shah**: I would urge the public to be proactive in advocating for their rights and well-being. Awareness and action are crucial. It’s not just about legal recourse but also about pushing for better environmental practices and policies through community engagement and advocacy.
**Interviewer**: Thank you for your insights, Justice Shah. It’s clear that the journey to environmental justice is multi-faceted and requires collaboration between the judiciary, government, and citizens.
**Justice Shah**: Thank you for having me. Together, we can work towards a cleaner and healthier environment for generations to come.
