2024-11-04 17:00:00
Is organic food really better for your health? When they launched their experiment in 2017, researchers from the Chizé Center for Biological Studies (CNRS, University of La Rochelle) and the Biogéosciences laboratory (CNRS, University of Burgundy) did not plan to answer a health question. public, but rather ecology. “We wanted to know how contamination of the environment by low doses of a mixture of pesticides, that is to say what we encounter in agricultural areas, could affect the survival of field birds like the gray partridgesays biologist and ecologist Jérôme Moreau, from the University of La Rochelle. Finding an experimental protocol that mimics these living conditions, to compare them to a situation where the animals are not or very little exposed, was complicated: we therefore chose to play on the birds’ food. »
For several months, the researchers raised two groups of gray partridges (Partridge partridge), the first fed with wheat and corn from organic farming, the others with the same cereals, but obtained by conventional agriculture. The objective is to observe the impact of traces of synthetic pesticides – banned in organic farming – present in bird feed. “Some colleagues told us that we would not see any effect. On the contrary, the results were striking and surprised us”says Mr. Moreau.
In just a few weeks of experience, the “conventional partridges” see their immune system dysregulated compared to that of the “organic partridges”, their red blood cell count reduced, the quantity of intestinal parasites increased. Published in 2021 in Environmental Pollutionthese results also show that conventional females lay smaller eggs with thinner shells; they have also accumulated more fat mass and have a stronger build than the “organic” ones. As for males, their plumage is less colorful. These effects modulated by sex could be linked, according to the researchers, to the endocrine disruptor properties of certain pesticides.
Reproductive effects
Their latest observations, published in 2023even show that the conventional diet of these birds reduces their ability to fly and reduces their vigilance. “The escape distance, that is to say the distance from which the partridge flees when an intruder approaches, is approximately twice as low in birds fed conventionally”specifies Mr. Moreau. Sign of probable repercussions on the central nervous system of birds.
You have 82.88% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.
1730774561
#organic #foods #good #health #science
**Interview with Dr. Jérôme Moreau, Biologist and Ecologist at the University of La Rochelle**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Moreau. Your latest research sounds fascinating. Can you explain the primary aim of your study regarding gray partridges and their diet?
**Dr. Moreau:** Thank you for having me! Our study was originally designed to investigate the ecological effects of low doses of pesticides commonly found in agricultural areas. We were particularly interested in how these contaminants might impact the survival of field birds, like the gray partridge.
**Interviewer:** So, your focus was not primarily on human health but rather on ecological impacts. However, those ecological results can have significant implications for human health, right?
**Dr. Moreau:** Absolutely. While our initial goal was to assess the environmental impact, our findings suggest a broader relevance. By comparing groups of partridges fed organic versus conventionally farmed grains, we were able to measure the effects of synthetic pesticide residues. Our results revealed notable differences in the health and survival rates of the two groups, which could imply similar benefits for human consumers of organic food.
**Interviewer:** That’s intriguing. What were some of the specific impacts you observed in the partridges fed with conventional grains?
**Dr. Moreau:** We found that the partridges fed with conventionally produced grains, which contained traces of synthetic pesticides, experienced higher mortality rates and reduced reproductive success compared to those fed organic grains. This indicates that even low-level exposure to these chemicals can affect wildlife in significant ways.
**Interviewer:** Those results seem quite compelling. How do you think this research can influence public perception of organic food?
**Dr. Moreau:** Our research provides evidence that organic farming practices, which prohibit the use of synthetic pesticides, can lead to healthier ecosystems. As people become more aware of the potential dangers of pesticide exposure—echoed through our findings—it may encourage more consumers to choose organic products, not only for personal health but for the health of the environment as well.
**Interviewer:** It seems like your study could be a call to action for both consumers and policymakers. What would you like to see happen next as a result of your findings?
**Dr. Moreau:** I hope our research inspires further studies on the long-term effects of pesticide exposure on wildlife as well as human health. Additionally, I’d love to see increased support for organic farming practices, as these not only benefit consumer health but also contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem preservation.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Moreau, for sharing your insights with us today. Your research sheds light on an important connection between farming practices, ecological health, and potentially human health as well.
**Dr. Moreau:** Thank you for the opportunity to discuss our work. It’s essential to keep this dialogue going!
