A new global study has raised questions about the views associated with internet use in the past.
In a study conducted at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, researchers analyzed the data of 2.4 million people from 168 countries for more than 15 years. The purpose of the research was to try to find out the positive or negative effects of regular internet use on health.
The study found that people who had Internet access in all these countries had an 8.5 percent higher rate of life satisfaction, while those who had a positive Internet experience had an 8.3 percent higher rate.
In 33,000 different numerical models and a subset of the data, the researchers found that 84.9 percent of the correlations between the Internet and well-being were positive.
Andrew Rzybylski, a professor of human behavior and technology at the Oxford Internet Institute, said it was an outdated idea, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
“If we want to make the internet world safe for kids, we can’t have a one-size-fits-all attitude,” he said. We need to make sure that our minds are influenced by data.
The study assessed well-being on eight indicators, including life satisfaction, negative and positive daily experiences, two measures of social well-being, physical well-being, social well-being and experiences of purpose.
The study also looked at factors such as education, income and health. However, the study also did not look at social media use.
#effects #Internet #human #health #Important #disclosure
**Interview with Andrew Rzybylski, Professor of Human Behavior and Technology at the Oxford Internet Institute**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Professor Rzybylski. Your recent study has stirred quite a discussion about the effects of internet use on mental health. Many people have long believed that the internet has harmful effects on psychological well-being. How does your research challenge that perception?
**Andrew Rzybylski:** Thank you for having me. Our research undertook a comprehensive analysis over 15 years, involving 2.4 million people from 168 countries. Surprisingly, we found that the majority of correlations—about 85 percent—between internet use and well-being were positive. This is significant because it suggests that, rather than being a primary source of distress, the internet can contribute to life satisfaction.
**Interviewer:** That’s fascinating. Many critics argue that while the internet may enhance life satisfaction for some, it can also lead to issues like cyberbullying, addiction, and social isolation. What would you say to those concerns?
**Andrew Rzybylski:** Those are valid concerns, and they certainly exist. However, our findings indicate that internet use isn’t universally negative; it can actually provide substantial benefits. We should indeed be cautious about harmful behaviors associated with internet usage, but a nuanced approach that takes individual experiences into account is necessary. Not everyone has the same experience online.
**Interviewer:** You mention the need for a nuanced approach. What specific measures do you think should be taken to balance the benefits with the potential harms of internet use, especially for children?
**Andrew Rzybylski:** Absolutely. We need targeted strategies rather than a one-size-fits-all solution. This may involve equipping parents and educators with tools to better guide children in their internet use. Additionally, we should continue fostering environments that promote positive online experiences, while being vigilant against negative influences.
**Interviewer:** Considering these findings, do you think social media platforms should change their policies? Should we be questioning the way that social media is portrayed in public discourse?
**Andrew Rzybylski:** Yes, it’s critical to reassess how we view and manage social media. While our study didn’t specifically look at social media use, there’s clearly a need to understand the specific mechanisms at play in those environments. Both platforms and users should be part of the dialogue to create healthier online spaces.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, how do you think this research will impact public perception of the internet, especially among parents and educators?
**Andrew Rzybylski:** I hope it prompts a more balanced conversation. While it’s important to acknowledge the risks associated with internet use, we should also recognize its potential benefits. An informed dialogue about internet use might help alleviate fears while promoting a more constructive approach to digital citizenship and online safety.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Professor Rzybylski, for your insights. It seems that while the internet has its downsides, a deeper understanding of its potential benefits could change the way we approach it.
**Andrew Rzybylski:** Thank you for having me. It’s essential we continue to engage in this conversation actively.
**Debate Question for Readers:**
Given the positive aspects of internet use highlighted by the study, do you think we should re-evaluate our criticisms of internet use, particularly among young people, or remain cautious due to the potential harms associated with social media? What are your thoughts?
