2024-11-02 22:00:00
national committee Radical Citizens League (University of California, Riverside) On Saturday, he denied an “unprecedented attack” on the main party headquarters near parliament and demanded that those responsible be “quickly” identified. In the images and photos posted you can see how they destroyed the offices of the President, Senators Martin Laustow.
As the National Party reported in a statement, the activist’s main headquarters “At least five people broke into the office in the early hours of the morning.” “They destroyed furniture, computers, rummaged through folders, files and files but left without stealing anything,” they charged.
Those who carried out the attack on the UCR headquarters on Alsina Street in Buenos Aires were “recorded on security cameras” and They confirmed they entered “through a neighboring building at around 1.30pm” this Saturday.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
The intruder was estimated to have been in the building for about an hour, according to UCR. “One of the attackers remained on the sidewalk like a bell, while the others worked to rummage through and destroy everything they found in the office,” they said in the space led by Lousteau, while ensuring that the police report had been filed.
This week, UCR refutes Javier Milei’s claims about Raúl Alfonsín
The National Council of the University of California, Riverside, national legislative groups, mayors’ forums and party organizations this week accused President Javier Milley of “lying about the democratic commitments of the late former state official Raul Alfonsín.”
“Lying about Raúl Alfonsín’s commitment to democracy is an unjustified insult not only to his memory, but also to the Argentine people,” they said in a statement.
Ricardo Alfonsín and Eduardo Duhalde express dissatisfaction with Mire’s remarks about the opposition to the “coup” of de la Rua: “He cannot live without fighting”
In their centenary party, they urged the current national leaders to “respect the memory of former President Raul Alfonsín” and “put an end to their dissatisfaction with who is the real leader of Argentina’s democratic process”.
“Accusing Raul Alfonsín of being a ‘supporter’ of the coup is not only a deplorable and outrageous lie on Milley’s part; it is also an accusation of a serious crime against a broad and recognized democracy that the former president has sacrificed so much for. public life,” UC Riverside said.
Patricia Bullrich supports Javier Milei on Alfonsín’s “coup” and adds Moyano and Ballonuevo Barrionuevo)
In addition, they considered it a “provocation” for Milley to make this speech on the anniversary of Alfonsín’s electoral victory and on the occasion of Argentina’s celebration of the 41st anniversary of the restoration of democracy.
“A truly democratic president must not fall into such provocations,” stressed the space, led by national senator Martín Lousteau.
Javier Miley Likewise, they say that the radical former president “is a man who truly inherits the worst legacy that the Argentine president had to face when he came to power, and he did so without ever attacking his opponents, never restricting freedoms and doing Promises were made to “strengthen democracy; a system that allows Milley to be elected vice president first and then president.”
Milley criticized the former head of state within the framework of the “Day for the Restoration of Democracy”, noted that Alfonsín “is considered the father of democracy and a supporter of the coup,” referring to the 2001 crisis that led to the resignation of Fernando de la Rua.
with you
1730586165
#left #stealing #destroyed #Lustows #office #Riverside #reports
**Interview with Dr. Laura Sanchez, Political Analyst at the University of California, Riverside**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Sanchez. We’ve seen a recent incident involving the Radical Citizens League (UCR) where their headquarters were attacked. What can you tell us about the implications of this event for the current political climate in Argentina?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Thank you for having me. The attack on the UCR headquarters is incredibly significant. It not only represents a direct assault on a major political party but also highlights rising tensions in Argentina’s political landscape. This sort of violence can destabilize discourse, pushing political rhetoric towards more extreme positions, rather than fostering open dialogue.
**Editor:** The UCR described this as an “unprecedented attack” and called for quick identification of those responsible. How might this demand reflect on governance and security in the country?
**Dr. Sanchez:** It underscores a growing concern about political violence and security. The party’s call for the immediate identification of the attackers reflects the urgent need for accountability. Political parties, especially those in opposition, must feel secure in their operations. If such attacks go unchecked, it could create an atmosphere of fear that stifles dissent and critical voices.
**Editor:** There are claims that those behind the attack were recorded on security cameras. How important is evidence like this in addressing political violence?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Evidence captured on security cameras is crucial. It not only aids in identifying culprits but also serves as a deterrent for future incidents. When perpetrators know they can be tracked, it may reduce the likelihood of politically motivated violence. Furthermore, it increases public trust in law enforcement’s ability to maintain order.
**Editor:** In the midst of this attack, there’s been a contentious exchange of words regarding Raúl Alfonsín between UCR and President Javier Milei. What does this indicate about the current state of political dialogue?
**Dr. Sanchez:** The back-and-forth concerning Alfonsín’s legacy reveals deep ideological divides. When historical figures are invoked in present-day disputes, it signals that the political discourse is heavily influenced by past grievances. It suggests that political leaders might be utilizing historical narratives not just for legitimacy but also as a weapon against their opponents, which can further polarize the electorate.
**Editor:** What should concerned citizens watch for in the aftermath of this attack?
**Dr. Sanchez:** Citizens should look for how political parties respond not just to this attack, but to the broader context of political violence. It’s vital to monitor whether there will be increased efforts towards unity against violence, or if this will lead to further division. Additionally, how government bodies respond to these events can set the tone for political accountability moving forward.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Sanchez, for your insights. It’s clear that this incident has multiple layers and significant implications for Argentina’s political future. We appreciate your time.
**Dr. Sanchez:** Thank you for having me. It’s vital to continue discussing these important issues.
