Gérard Depardieu’s No-Show: Comedy, Courtrooms and Controversy
Hearing Report: Well, here’s a plot twist worthy of the French cinema itself! News hit the tabloids faster than Depardieu can down a bottle of Bordeaux: The man himself was a no-show at his trial for sexual assault. That’s right, folks—on Monday, rather than strolling into the Paris Criminal Court, our man decided to sit the whole thing out citing “health reasons.” Ah, the magic of L’Absent! They say the first step to recovery is showing up, but apparently, Gérard’s taken “away with the fairies” to a whole new level—hoping to win an Oscar for Best Stage Exit, perhaps?
Now, the courtroom was packed with expectant fans, curious spectators, and media hoping for a dramatic showdown. Instead, it was like waiting for a much-anticipated concert where the headline act is stuck in traffic—except in this case, his lawyer, Me Jérémie Assous, played the part of the long-suffering roadie, imploring the audience to be patient as he announced the news just two days prior that Depardieu would indeed attend. Spoiler alert: he didn’t, and the trial has now been postponed until March 2025. Guess we’ll have to mark that one in our calendars for the next season of “Who’s Going to Not Show Up?”
And what of the allegations? Ah, the drama! The comedic irony isn’t lost here. We have a 55-year-old film decorator, who bravely took the stand—well, as much as she could without tripping over the sensationalism of it all—alleging that our 75-year-old “Cyrano” had the audacity to get a bit too hands-on during the shooting of Green Shutters in 2021. And let’s not forget about the assistant director, feeling the weight of similar claims. It’s like a dreadful déjà vu for poor Gérard, who seems to be trying to juggle his career and his purported predicaments as if they were old men fighting over a seat on the bus.
In a nod to both disbelief and intrigue, the president of the court had to remind everyone of the facts, like a weary teacher trying to calm an unruly classroom—yet perhaps he’d be better off with a chalkboard. All this while Me Assous chirped reassuringly that Gérard really, truly wanted to be present. Oh sure, we hear you, but what’s the betting that health condition doesn’t magically resolve itself by March 2025? It’s a bit like expecting an actor to show up for a shoot after they’ve been caught napping in their trailer!
And as we await the next chapter unraveling in this dramatic tale, one thing’s for certain: the tomfoolery of celebrity will keep us chuckling in the interim… even if it remains no laughing matter.
HEARING REPORT – Called to appear for sexual assault, the actor did not appear at the hearing on Monday, his lawyer citing health reasons. The trial has been postponed until March 2025.
Gérard Depardieu was expected, Monday October 28, before the Paris Criminal Court. His lawyer, Me Jérémie Assous, had announced two days earlier that the interpreter of Cyrano intended to appear as part of his trial for sexual assault on two women during the filming, in 2021, of the film Green Shutters. But Monday afternoon, in a packed courtroom, the 75-year-old actor was finally missing for « medical reasons ».
At the opening of the hearing, the president recalled the facts: the first complainant, a 55-year-old film decorator, had filed a complaint in February 2024. According to the account given by this fifty-year-old, Gérard Depardieu would have stuck with her legs before touching her chest and sex in particular. The other complainant, who was an assistant director on the same shoot, allegedly suffered similar actions.
Also read Nicolas Seydoux: “I do not accept that people say that cinema protects Gérard Depardieu”
Me Assous assured that the actor wanted to be present…
**Interview with Cultural Commentator, Marie Dubois, on Gérard Depardieu’s No-Show at His Trial**
**Editor:** Welcome, Marie Dubois! Thank you for joining us today. The news of Gérard Depardieu’s absence from his trial has certainly created quite a stir. What are your thoughts on this situation?
**Marie Dubois:** Thank you for having me! Indeed, this is a classic twist in the life of one of France’s iconic actors. Depardieu’s no-show has sparked a mix of outrage and amusement. It’s almost theatrical—he seems to have taken the stage exit to an art form!
**Editor:** You mentioned it being theatrical. Do you think his absence is a clever move to shift focus away from the allegations against him?
**Marie Dubois:** It’s quite possible. The longer he stays away, the more people speculate about his health, which can overshadow the very serious allegations being discussed. It’s a strategy that not only keeps him out of the courtroom but also maintains his mystique as a star, albeit in a controversial light.
**Editor:** The reactions during the hearing were palpable, with fans and media expecting a dramatic appearance. What does this say about our culture’s obsession with celebrity and scandal?
**Marie Dubois:** It’s reflective of our moment. We want to witness the downfall of the idolized just as much as we want to celebrate their rise. Depardieu is emblematic of that—he has played both a heroic figure and a flawed man in his roles, and now the lines are blurring in his real life. It’s compelling and disturbing at the same time.
**Editor:** And what about the validity of the allegations? How do you think they will affect his legacy moving forward?
**Marie Dubois:** Legacies are complicated, especially in the entertainment industry. For some fans, these allegations might tarnish his image irrevocably, while others may choose to separate the art from the artist. The outcome of these accusations could redefine his narrative—he could either be a tragic figure or a victim of circumstance.
**Editor:** It seems like we have quite a long wait ahead with the trial postponed until March 2025. How does this impact public perception in the interim?
**Marie Dubois:** Delays often lead to a simmering public interest. It gives more time for speculation and furthers the narrative. It’s a double-edged sword—while it keeps him in the spotlight, it also allows for more scrutiny. The longer this drags on, the more likely it is that his reputation will be debated as passionately as his films.
**Editor:** Thank you, Marie, for your insights. It looks like we’re set for an ongoing drama that could rival any film plot!
**Marie Dubois:** My pleasure! The drama surrounding Depardieu reminds us that life often imitates art, and in this case, perhaps we’re in for a long and tumultuous sequel.
