The judiciary is looking into the controversial case between a Moroccan immigrant and a lawyer, in which the lawyers refused to plead.

Agadir 24 | Agadir24

The judicial body of the Court of First Instance in Casablanca is expected to consider the controversial case between a Moroccan immigrant and a lawyer tomorrow, Wednesday, October 30, 2024.
and

Moroccan citizen Hussein Boukhier, residing in Europe, sent a new open letter to the Chairman of the Justice, Legislation and Human Rights Committee of the House of Representatives in Rabat on the subject: Allegations of a lawyer in the Casablanca Authority.

Boukhaire detailed the issue of fabricated disputes against him and against his legitimate interests and rights by the so-called Mr. Mohamed Bouhi, a lawyer at the Casablanca Authority, who was pleading for him in some files and then suddenly switched from defense to attack and without warning.

Boukhier said in the new letter, a copy of which was received by Agadir 24: “I return to explain to you and to public opinion and to complain about my situation regarding what happened to me as a result of the commercial dealings that brought me together with the lawyer, Mr. Mohamed Bouhi, the consequences of which piled up on me in a successive and continuous manner, and after tension and barrenness.” And many skirmishes and multiple files, and I have full confidence in the course of our justice and in the supremacy of the law of our homeland, today I arrive at the filing of four files to appeal the invalidity with the suspension of execution, registered in the Civil Court of First Instance in Casablanca under numbers 132/133/134/135//1123// 2024, hoping to God Almighty that things will go well.
Bukhier added, saying: “Before delving into the matter, another wound was added to the disaster, which is the continuing refusal of lawyers to plead for me against a professor of theirs and a colleague in the profession, or to demand sums of money from me, which can be said to be impossible, to say the least. The best evidence is what happened to me with… The last lawyer offered me a waiver of delegation as soon as he delved into the matter to discover what was wrong with it, and all of this was a blatant attack on my constitutional right to litigation, pleading, and due representation before the judiciary, and against all royal letters that establish the administration’s roles and relationships. With the citizens, even if I am seriously considering bringing in a foreign lawyer from outside the country to represent me, as long as the Moroccan professors refuse or are unable, and on the other hand, my patriotic feeling and my jealousy for my country and for my countrymen prevent me from appearing in the guise of those who try to diminish, harm and distort his country. Because of a matter for which a solution can be found without reaching undesirable consequences, and at the same time out of my belief in the honor, credibility, and honesty of those who wear the black suit, who are honorable and upright people working in the law firm, to whom we have full appreciation and respect, we will not generalize negative situations that expose us and are exposed to them. A group of Moroccan citizens, along with some lawyers, may God forgive them, suffer from it.
I point out, by way of example and not as a limitation, that I was greatly harmed by what happened to me regarding the subject of complaint No. 46/2024 against an employee of the Court of First Instance in Guelmim, which is currently before the Public Prosecutor at the Court of Appeal in Guelmim, carrying within it a clear and consistent forgery, and despite that, I am subject to unrelenting delay. A clear reason, and also the complaint No. 851/3101/2024 before the Attorney of His Majesty the King at the Court of First Instance in Guelmim, against my stepmother, who disdained a judicial decision, and issued a forged document linked to testimony bearing false witnesses in which the crimes of forgery, incitement to false testimony, or the use of an invalid document were proven. True, not to mention the expansion and exploitation of an undivided inheritance, which is what has been proven, and yet the concerned person receives strange mitigating circumstances and in two consecutive related files, all of which are ineffective rulings, which leads me to wonder when the case of recidivism is considered, and when the ruling is made. Effective or not, and what considerations are in place for adopting mitigating circumstances, questioning what I have understood and seen, that these crimes lead to definite and effective imprisonment, and that two consecutive suspended sentences are rarely issued for the same person and in interconnected files that carry within them the same content. .
Bukhir also said: “I also draw your attention to the fact that I wrote to the Minister of Justice with a complaint dated 01/17/2023 under number 5561, which His Honorable Eminence responded to me on 03/06/2023 under number 2738 that it had been referred to the Attorney General at the Court of Cassation, President The Public Prosecution on 02/23/2023, under the number 2343, is the complaint from which I have not heard anything yet, and I cannot find any trace of it. Therefore, I ask you to intervene to correct the matter and direct those concerned to the necessity of answering citizens’ complaints as soon as possible, in line with developments and The current and new directives in the management of the honorable Moroccan administrations, and I confirm that the controversies created by Professor Lawyer Mohamed Buhi will not prevent us from continuing to demand my rights and in return perform my duties to the fullest. In return, I ask you, as I asked you before in my previous letter, to find a solution for me. The solutions to establish and maintain my confidence in national justice and law are through finding a lawyer to plead for me at reasonable fees and with full responsibility, then researching and investigating all the files in which the aforementioned professor pleaded in order to find out the truth and give everyone his right, and also research. With the professor and asking him to provide evidence and proof of what he claims, that I obtained, within the framework of a reconciliation or otherwise, real estate and hundreds of hectares of land that I obtained thanks to his efforts, and proof of whoever claimed, and I challenge the professor, the lawyer, to prove the matter and confirm his claims, and I hold on to my right to follow up. The professor is against the allegations about real estate and hectares that he claims, and justice has the right to take the measures it deems legally appropriate against him, as he is a man of the law and he is supposed to respect that and not exploit the matter to issue vengeful judicial rulings in the name of His Majesty the King against everyone who does not comply with his whims and desires. I also challenge him about the sums of money documented in financial transfers that he received from me in the context of advances between us and not fees or anything else. I have requested several audio recordings related to the matter to prove it and refute the claims of the professor, the lawyer, and I challenge him again about that. Bukhir ends his letter.