Prabowo Will Regularly Evaluate the Performance of Red and White Cabinet Ministers

Prabowo Will Regularly Evaluate the Performance of Red and White Cabinet Ministers

Prabowo Will Regularly Evaluate the Performance of Red and White Cabinet Ministers”/>

Atmosphere of the Retreat for ministers and deputy ministers of the Red and White Cabinet at the Magelang Military Academy, Central Java, Friday (25/10). (Antara/Muhammad Adimaja)

PRESIDENT Prabowo Subianto will routinely evaluate the performance of ministers in the Red and White Cabinet. This was emphasized by the Minister of State Secretary (Mensesneg) Prasetyo Hadi

He denied that the evaluation would be carried out every six months. “Endak, endak, evaluation is not like that. Evaluation will be evaluated every day, every time it will be evaluated,” Prasetyo was quoted as saying, Monday (28/10).

According to him, evaluation cannot be set within a certain time period. However, Prabowo will pay close attention to the performance of the ministers in his cabinet.

Pras claims that all ministers, including heads of institutions appointed by Prabowo Subianto, are competent people.

Pras asked the public to give the Red and White Cabinet time to work optimally after being inaugurated on October 21 2024.

“Give him the opportunity to work hard, prove that he really wants to fight for the nation and state, wants to fight for society,” he stressed.

PDIP DPP Chairman Said Abdullah asked Prabowo Subianto to regularly carry out evaluations of the ranks of ministers in the Red and White Cabinet.

“We hope that the president can evaluate this cabinet’s 6 month or 1 year journey,” said Said. (P-5)

#Prabowo #Regularly #Evaluate #Performance #Red #White #Cabinet #Ministers
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maya⁢ Santoso on President ⁣Prabowo Subianto’s⁤ Plans ​for‍ Cabinet Evaluations**

**Editor:** Thank you for joining us⁣ today, Dr. Santoso. ⁤There’s been significant discussion⁣ about President⁣ Prabowo Subianto’s recent announcement regarding the routine evaluations of his‌ cabinet ministers. What do you think prompted this decision?

**Dr. Santoso:** ​Thank you for having me. President Prabowo’s ‌decision appears‍ to be rooted in his ‌commitment to⁢ governance transparency and⁢ accountability. ⁣This move could ‍be‌ a response⁢ to previous ⁤criticisms about ministerial​ performance, and it reflects a desire to ensure that each ⁢member of‍ the cabinet is meeting the administration’s goals effectively.

**Editor:** The evaluations are set to take ⁢place regularly. How might this‍ impact the dynamics‌ within ⁣the cabinet and the functioning of the government?

**Dr. Santoso:** Regular evaluations could generate a sense of urgency ‍among ministers ⁢to⁢ perform better, as their positions would‌ be constantly under ‍scrutiny. This can‍ foster a competitive environment where ministers strive for excellence.​ However, it⁣ could also lead⁢ to anxiety and instability​ if the assessments are ⁣perceived as overly harsh or politicized.

**Editor:** Considering ​the broader political landscape, how‍ do you think⁣ this approach aligns with President Prabowo’s overall strategy for governance?

**Dr. Santoso:** This ‌strategy⁣ aligns well with Prabowo’s image ⁢as a decisive leader. ⁣By creating an atmosphere⁤ of‍ accountability, he may be attempting ⁤to build ⁣public trust⁢ and legitimacy ⁢in his ⁢administration. Moreover, regular​ evaluations could help him ​identify top performers, which can be crucial for future political maneuvers.

**Editor:**​ Do you⁤ foresee any challenges that might arise from this regular evaluation process?

**Dr. Santoso:** Absolutely. One major⁤ challenge could be resistance from ​ministers who may feel threatened or challenged by the⁤ evaluations. Additionally, if not ⁢executed transparently, these evaluations could lead to distrust within‍ the cabinet. ‍It’s⁤ essential ⁤for Prabowo‌ to implement a fair ⁤and ⁣constructive evaluation process to maintain morale and cohesion among his‍ ministers.

**Editor:** Lastly, how might⁤ the ‌public ⁢react to this initiative?

**Dr. Santoso:**​ Public reaction is likely to be mixed. Many citizens may appreciate the⁤ push for accountability, seeing ‍it as a positive step ⁤towards effective governance. On the other hand,‌ some might view it as a political ⁣tactic‌ or ‍a distraction‍ from other pressing issues.⁢ Transparency in ⁣how these evaluations are conducted will be crucial in shaping ⁢public perception.

**Editor:** ​Thank you, ‍Dr. Santoso, for⁣ your insights. ‌It will be‍ interesting to see how ⁤President Prabowo’s evaluations unfold and their impact on the‌ cabinet as well as the ‌broader political landscape.

**Dr. Santoso:** Thank you for having me! I’m looking ⁣forward to following these developments.

Crucial for building a strong and effective government capable of addressing pressing national issues. Ultimately, it reinforces his authority while promoting productivity among the ministers.

**Editor:** There have been mixed reactions to this announcement, particularly from political figures like Said Abdullah who are calling for more structured evaluations. What do you make of this divide?

**Dr. Santoso:** It’s not uncommon in politics to see differing opinions on such matters. While some, like Abdullah, advocate for structured evaluations every six months or annually, Prabowo’s approach favors ongoing assessments. This could reflect differing visions for governance; Abdullah’s perspective suggests a more traditional oversight mechanism, while Prabowo is pushing for a more dynamic, real-time evaluation process. It will be interesting to see how these approaches coexist and influence cabinet morale and effectiveness.

**Editor:** Lastly, launching a cabinet that is still finding its footing can be challenging. What advice would you give to the Red and White Cabinet to navigate this period?

**Dr. Santoso:** My advice would be to embrace open communication and collaboration within the cabinet. Transparency about the evaluation process will help mitigate fears and build trust among ministers. They should also focus on teamwork and collective goals, which can lead to better outcomes for the administration and, ultimately, the public. Ensuring that evaluations are constructive rather than punitive will also be key to their long-term success.

**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Santoso, for your insights. It will be intriguing to observe how these evaluations shape the Red and White Cabinet’s performance in the coming months.

**Dr. Santoso:** Thank you for having me. I look forward to discussing these developments as they unfold.

Leave a Replay