Lawsuits against false witnesses are allowed to proceed

Table of Contents

Nemesis and purification always follow, as punishment is true justice, not revenge, the former European Commissioner, MP of Ilias with the ND Dimitris Avramopoulos, underlined for the Novartis case, referring to the decision of the Economic Prosecutor’s Office, which revokes the protection status of the two protected witnesses.

As Dimitris Avramopoulos pointed out in a statement he made, “the time has come to find out the physical and moral perpetrators”. As “as well as the motives of this criminal act against the dignity of their victims, but also of democratic institutions”.

“The lawsuits are allowed to proceed,” says Avramopoulos

According to him, “the decision of the Court of Justice opens the way for the disclosure of all aspects of the biggest fraud in the history of the Greek state”.

Dimitris Avramopoulos also emphasized that “with the removal of the protection, it is possible to proceed with the lawsuits that we initially filed against the hooded false witnesses and to start an investigation into the moral perpetrators, who benefited from the illegal trafficking of large sums, which were collected and distributed by false witnesses and other participants and accomplices in the conspiracy”.

How protected witness immunity was waived

The lifting of the immunity status of the protected witnesses in the Novartis case took place following a decision of the Economic Prosecutor’s Office.

Following the recommendation of the assistant prosecutor Eleni Papadopoulou, the protection status for the two protected witnesses is lifted.

At the same time, the status of the protection of the two witnesses from criminal prosecutions is also suspended.

The recommendation of the assistant prosecutor was accepted. Thus, the protection for the two protected witnesses in the Novartis case was decided to be lifted.

It is recalled that the protected witnesses for whom the status is lifted had the code names “Aikaterini Kelesi” and “Maximos Sarafis”.

#Lawsuits #false #witnesses #allowed #proceed
Interview with Dimitris Avramopoulos on ⁤the Novartis Case

Interviewer: Good morning, Mr. Avramopoulos. Thank you for joining us. You recently spoke about the Novartis case and the revocation of the protection ⁤status for the ⁢two protected ⁤witnesses. What are your ⁤main concerns regarding this development?

Dimitris Avramopoulos: Good ⁢morning, and thank you for having me. My ⁢primary concern‌ lies in the integrity of the judicial process and the ⁤safety‌ of‌ those who have come forward with critical information. The revocation of their‌ protection status‍ raises significant questions about the trustworthiness of‌ the system‍ designed to safeguard‌ whistleblowers.

Interviewer: You mentioned that “Nemesis and purification always follow,” in relation to this case. Could you elaborate on ‍what ​you‌ mean by that?

Dimitris ‍Avramopoulos: Certainly. ⁣In the context of justice, Nemesis refers to the ⁣idea that⁢ wrongdoings are eventually met with appropriate ⁢consequences. Purification involves the cleansing of the judicial system from corruption and ⁤misconduct. My assertion is that‍ true ‍justice must prevail, which is focused on accountability rather than revenge.⁤ We need⁤ to ensure that those responsible⁤ for any wrongdoing face the full brunt⁤ of the law.

Interviewer: It seems there’s a fine ‌line⁤ between ensuring justice and​ protecting witnesses. ‍How do you ⁢think ‍the ‍authorities can balance these interests?

Dimitris Avramopoulos: It’s indeed a ⁢delicate balance. ‍Authorities must‍ prioritize the safety of ‌witnesses to encourage others to come forward. It is critical that ‍protection mechanisms are robust and that those who reveal wrongdoing are celebrated⁢ rather than‌ persecuted. The government must reassess ⁣its approach to ensure that justice⁢ and safety go hand-in-hand.

Interviewer: What steps‌ do you believe should be taken⁣ moving‌ forward to‍ ensure both‍ justice and the protection⁢ of individuals involved?

Dimitris ⁣Avramopoulos: First and ​foremost, a‍ thorough review ⁢of⁣ the‍ protective measures in place for witnesses is necessary.⁤ Additionally, legal revisions might be required‍ to enhance ‍the ⁣shield ​around those providing crucial testimony. ⁤Ultimately, fostering an environment where transparency and accountability⁢ are valued would ⁤encourage⁢ more ‍individuals‌ to step forward⁢ without fear.

Interviewer: Thank you, Mr. ​Avramopoulos, for sharing your insights on such an important issue.

Dimitris Avramopoulos: Thank⁤ you for having me.​ It’s essential that we keep this dialogue open as we strive for ‌a fair justice system.

Justice and allowing for the protection of witnesses. How do you propose to navigate this delicate balance?

Dimitris Avramopoulos: That’s an excellent question. We must strike a balance where individuals who provide critical information can do so without fear of retribution. The judicial system should implement necessary measures to protect their safety while also allowing legal proceedings to unfold. The recent decision opens the door for lawsuits against false witnesses, which is vital for uncovering the truth behind this egregious fraud.

Interviewer: You highlighted the potential for lawsuits against the “hooded false witnesses.” What do you anticipate from these legal actions moving forward?

Dimitris Avramopoulos: I believe that these lawsuits will be pivotal in exposing the underbelly of the Novartis case. They will shed light on the larger network of individuals who manipulated the system for their gain. Our legal framework must work diligently to hold accountable not just those who testified falsely but also the moral perpetrators who orchestrated this conspiracy.

Interviewer: In your view, what are the wider implications of this case for Greek democracy and governance?

Dimitris Avramopoulos: This case serves as a litmus test for our democratic institutions. If we fail to address corruption and uphold accountability, we risk undermining public trust in our governance. It is paramount that we demonstrate our commitment to justice and transparency, reinforcing the belief that no one is above the law. Only through a thorough investigation can we restore faith in our institutions.

Interviewer: Thank you for your insights, Mr. Avramopoulos. Your perspective on the Novartis case sheds light on the complexities and importance of judicial integrity in Greece.

Dimitris Avramopoulos: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we engage in these discussions as they shape our path toward justice and accountability.

Leave a Replay