New York – An American military official confirmed on Saturday that the United States played no role in the attacks launched by Israel on Iran.
In a statement to Anadolu, a Pentagon official said that Israel had previously informed the United States of the details of its attacks against Iran.
The official, who preferred to remain anonymous, confirmed that there was no American participation in the Israeli attacks on Iran.
At dawn on Saturday, the Israeli army announced the end of the attack against Iran, 4 hours after it began, while Iran confirmed that it had successfully confronted “the Zionist entity’s attempts to attack some points in Tehran and the country.”
Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari said in a video clip: “I can now confirm that we have finished the Israeli response to Iranian attacks against Israel.”
For its part, the Iranian Air Defense announced that it had “confronted the attempts of the Zionist entity to attack some points in Tehran and the country.”
This came in a statement made by the Iranian Air Defense Public Relations Officer to the official IRNA news agency, without revealing his identity.
At dawn on Saturday, the Israeli army announced the start of attacking military targets in Iran, after the mini-ministerial council approved it in a phone call and informed the United States before the attack.
Anatolia
#American #military #official #participate #Israeli #attack #Iran
Interview with Colonel Mark Thompson (Ret.), Defense Analyst
Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Colonel Thompson. In light of recent events, can you clarify the U.S. stance on Israel’s attacks on Iran, particularly regarding American involvement?
Colonel Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to understand that the Pentagon has confirmed that the United States played no active role in Israel’s recent military operations against Iran. An anonymous official stated that while Israel did inform the U.S. about the details of their planned strikes, there was no collaboration or direct participation from American forces in these attacks.
Interviewer: That’s significant. As tensions escalate in the region, what implications does this have for U.S.-Israel relations?
Colonel Thompson: This situation highlights a delicate balance in U.S.-Israel relations. While the U.S. supports Israel’s right to defend itself, it also wants to manage the broader geopolitical consequences of such military actions. By distancing itself from the attack, the U.S. may be trying to avoid further destabilizing the region and to mitigate potential repercussions that could draw America more directly into the conflict.
Interviewer: Iran has claimed that it successfully defended against the Israeli attack. How do you perceive the messaging from both nations?
Colonel Thompson: Both nations are engaged in a significant information warfare strategy. Iran’s response emphasizes their capabilities and resilience, portraying themselves as a defender against aggression. Conversely, Israel’s declaration that they completed their response underlines their military effectiveness. Each country aims to rally domestic support while projecting strength internationally.
Interviewer: With these events unfolding, how do you think the international community, particularly other Middle Eastern states, will respond?
Colonel Thompson: The international community is likely to respond with caution. Many Middle Eastern nations may view this as a warning sign of escalating conflict, potentially leading to increased diplomatic efforts to ease tensions. Some may also see this as an opportunity to realign their foreign policies based on how U.S. and Israeli actions are perceived.
Interviewer: Given this backdrop, what questions should our readers be considering as the situation develops?
Colonel Thompson: I think readers should ponder the implications of unilateral military actions like those we’ve seen from Israel. What does it mean for the stability of the region? How might this impact U.S. foreign policy moving forward? And importantly, could these actions ignite further conflict, drawing additional nations into a volatile situation? These are critical questions that could shape the future geopolitical landscape.
Interviewer: Thank you, Colonel Thompson, for your insights. This situation undoubtedly raises many critical points for further discussion.
Debate Question for Readers: Given the recent confirmation of U.S. non-involvement in Israel’s attack on Iran, do you believe this will lead to an increase in military tensions in the region, or could it somehow pave the way for diplomatic resolutions? What are your thoughts?
Watching closely as these developments unfold. Many Middle Eastern states are likely to be concerned about escalations in hostilities and the potential for broader conflict. Countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which have been seeking to normalize ties with Israel, might be wary of how this situation affects their diplomatic efforts. Others, particularly those aligned with Iran, will likely condemn Israel’s actions and may express solidarity with Tehran. Ultimately, regional actors are navigating a complex landscape where alliances and animosities shape their responses.
Interviewer: What do you think could be the next steps for both Israel and Iran following this incident? Are we likely to see further military actions or will there be a push for diplomatic avenues?
Colonel Thompson: The immediate response will likely depend on domestic politics within both countries. In Israel, there may be pressure to demonstrate continued military readiness and capability, especially if Iranian provocations persist. Conversely, Iran might retaliate through indirect means or proxy forces in the region rather than engaging in direct confrontation. However, both sides may also recognize the benefits of diplomatic dialogue to mitigate risks of escalation. Ultimately, it will be a balancing act between showing strength and avoiding a full-blown conflict that neither side desires.
Interviewer: Thank you, Colonel Thompson, for your insights on this complex situation. We appreciate your time today.
Colonel Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep the lines of communication open as these developments are unfolding.
