Their clear disagreement with the role assumed by Anna Diamantopoulou who was appointed responsible for Political Planning of PASOKindicated sources from the staff of the mayor of Athens Haris Doukas.
In fact, the Duke side also disagrees with the fact that not all the candidate Presidents are in the 9-member body. That is, Michalis Katrinis and Nadia Giannakopoulou are missing. He also recalls that the “Coordinating Political Center” was of his own inspiration.
“Haris Doukas”, said sources from his environment, “he accepted the proposal of President Nikos Androulakis to participate in the “Coordinating Political Center” of PASOK, since the establishment of the body was his own pre-election commitment. We point out, however, that the final composition of the body does not include all the candidates (as was the proposal of Haris Doukas), in order to demonstrate unity in practice”.
And they continue: “Strategic and political planning cannot be a one-man body and in a political direction. The overall choices, responsibilities, structures and positions in the party and in the Parliament, unfortunately do not exude the feeling of unity and do not promote the necessary compositions and transcendence”.
And they conclude: “In any case, we continue on the path of unity and PASOK’s victorious march.”
All changes
Pavlos Geroulanos, Haris Doukas and Anna Diamantopoulou are members of the nine-member Coordinating Political Center – something like the old Executive Office of PASOK. Also, Pavlos Geroulanos is appointed Parliamentary Representative of the party and Anna Diamantopoulou is in charge of Political Planning.
Michalis Katrinis assumes the role of Head of Defense Department, and Nadia Giannakopoulou as Head of Immigration and Asylum Department.
Thus, by decision of the President of PASOK – Movement for Change, Nikos Androulakis, a 9-member Coordinating Political Center is established, in which the following will participate:
Harry Doukas
Pavlos Geroulanos
Anna Diamantopoulou
Nikos Christodoulakis
Milena Apostolaki
Thanasis Glavinas
Myrto Samaras
Katerina Solomou
Yannis Vardakastanis
The former EU Commissioner is responsible for Political Planning. and former Minister, Anna Diamantopoulou.
Program Team Coordinator is Lefteris Karchimakis, Legal – Political Scientist and Katerina Plesia-Eustathopoulou, Engineer specializing in sustainable development, is the deputy.
Kostas Tsoukalas, Lawyer – Labor Specialist, is appointed as the press representative.
Olga Markogiannakis, Member of the Political Council & Dr. Civil Engineer.
For the position of Secretary of the Parliamentary Group, Dimitris Biagis, Member of Parliament for Corfu, is proposed, who is also responsible for Demographic Policy.
Ioannis Tsimaris, MP of Ioannina, is proposed for the position of Deputy Secretary of the Parliamentary Group.
Parliamentary Representatives will be:
• Pavlos Geroulanos
• Dimitris Manzos
In addition, the heads of the Parliamentary Departments of Work are announced:
– K.T.E. Finance: Paris Koukoulopoulos
– K.T.E. Finance (Banks, Private debt & borrower protection, Investments) Milena Apostolaki
– K.T.E. of Economy (Recovery Fund): Pavlos Geroulanos
– K.T.E. Foreign: Dimitris Manzos
– K.T.E. of National Defense: Michalis Katrinis
– K.T.E. Interior: Panagiotis Doudonis
– K.T.E. Education: Stefanos Parastatidis
– K.T.E. of Sports & Youth: Christina Staraka
– K.T.E. Health: Ioannis Tsimaris
– K.T.E. Citizen Protection: Giorgos Mulkiotis
– K.T.E. of Infrastructure and Transport: Tassos Nikolaidis
– K.T.E. Environment: Manolis Christodoulakis
– K.T.E. Energy: Frangiskos Parasiris
– K.T.E. Development: George Nikitiadis
– K.T.E. Small and medium entrepreneurship: Eleni Vatsina
– K.T.E. of Labor and Social Affairs: Pavlos Christidis
– K.T.E. Justice, Institutions and Transparency: Evangelia Liakoulis
– K.T.E. Human Rights: Ilhan Ahmed
– K.T.E. Culture: Naya Grigorakou
– K.T.E. Immigration and Asylum: Nadia Giannakopoulou
– K.T.E. of Social Cohesion and Family: Katerina Kazani
– K.T.E. of Agricultural Development and Food: Manolis Chnaris
– K.T.E. Shipping: Stavros Michaelidis & K.T.E. Island Policy: Panagiotis Paraskevaidis
– K.T.E. of Tourism: Katerina Spyridaki
– K.T.E. of Digital Governance: Apostolos Panas
– K.T.E. Climate Crisis and Civil Protection: Andreas Poulas
#Haris #Doukas #disagree #role #Diamantopoulos
Interview with Political Analyst, Dr. Elena Papadopoulos, on Recent Developments within PASOK
Interviewer: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Papadopoulos. There have been significant discussions regarding the recent appointments within the PASOK party. Can you provide some insight into the concerns expressed by Haris Doukas and his staff regarding Anna Diamantopoulou’s new role in Political Planning?
Dr. Papadopoulos: Absolutely. The concerns from Doukas’s camp seem rooted in a perceived lack of inclusivity in the decision-making process of the new Coordinating Political Center. By excluding candidates such as Michalis Katrinis and Nadia Giannakopoulou, there is a palpable sense of discontent regarding how unity is being portrayed within PASOK.
Interviewer: You mentioned the issue of unity. How is the composition of the nine-member Coordinating Political Center impacting the party’s claims of unity?
Dr. Papadopoulos: The framework of this body was initially presented as an effort to foster unity and collaboration among all candidates. However, the absence of key figures may undermine that goal. Doukas’s statement about strategic planning suggests that real cohesive collaboration is necessary for effective political direction. It seems that without all voices represented, the perception of unity may falter.
Interviewer: Doukas’s supporters also expressed a concern about the overall strategic direction of PASOK. What might that imply for the party’s future?
Dr. Papadopoulos: Their emphasis on a multi-faceted approach to strategic planning signifies a desire for a more collaborative environment within PASOK. The call for inclusivity in structuring meetings and decision-making processes indicates they are looking to foster a more democratic atmosphere. If these sentiments are not adequately addressed, it could lead to further divisions within the party, which would certainly hinder their electoral ambitions.
Interviewer: Given these tensions, how do you see the future landscape for PASOK?
Dr. Papadopoulos: While the calls for unity are strong, the underlying dissatisfaction could lead to fractures if not managed properly. However, if PASOK can reconcile these differences, prioritize inclusivity, and effectively communicate a cohesive vision, they could rally support and strengthen their position in the political arena. It’s definitely a pivotal moment for the party.
Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Papadopoulos, for your insights. It will be interesting to see how PASOK navigates these challenges moving forward.
Dr. Papadopoulos: Thank you for having me! I look forward to seeing how things develop.
Ection of PASOK. Can you elaborate on what these concerns entail and their potential implications for the party’s future?
Dr. Papadopoulos: Certainly. Doukas’s camp emphasizes that strategic and political planning should encompass a diverse representation of voices. The worry is that centralizing these decisions in a select few may lead to unilateral approaches that do not reflect the party’s broader base. This could alienate members and supporters who feel their perspectives are not valued. If the party fails to address these internal rifts, it may struggle to present a united front, which is crucial for electoral success.
Interviewer: Interestingly, Doukas has committed to pursuing unity within PASOK despite these disagreements. How do you foresee this balancing act playing out within the party?
Dr. Papadopoulos: It’s a delicate balancing act. On one hand, Doukas and his supporters seem genuinely intent on fostering unity and moving forward with PASOK’s agenda. On the other hand, if they feel consistently sidelined or if their concerns go unaddressed, we might see growing tensions. It’ll be critical for party leadership, including President Nikos Androulakis, to engage with all factions and create an atmosphere of inclusivity. Open dialogue can help reconcile these differences, but lack of action can lead to dissatisfaction that might over time affect party cohesion.
Interviewer: Lastly, what could be the broader implications of this leadership dynamic for PASOK’s performance in upcoming elections?
Dr. Papadopoulos: The effectiveness of PASOK’s governance will largely depend on whether it can present a unified front that resonates with voters. This means not just addressing the current dissent but also demonstrating a commitment to inclusivity and cooperation moving forward. If PASOK can harness the input of all its members and present a cohesive platform, it may enhance its appeal in the next elections. Conversely, if internal strife remains unresolved, it could result in lost support and electoral challenges.
Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Papadopoulos, for sharing your valuable insights on these developments within PASOK.
Dr. Papadopoulos: Thank you for having me. It will certainly be interesting to watch how this unfolds in the coming months.
