Joe Biden plans to extend sanctions against Venezuela for another year

Joe Biden, president of the United States (Efe)

This Tuesday the president of the United States, Joe Bideninformed Congress that it plans to extend the Executive Order 13,692 “beyond March 8” of this year, which declares Venezuela as “an unusual and extraordinary threat» for the security of your country.

«The situation in Venezuela continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat for the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13,692 regarding the situation in Venezuela«says part of the text contained in the letter that the president sent to the North American Congress, as highlighted by RT.

It must be remembered that This decree is the one that has given rise to the more than 900 economic and financial sanctions that Washington has imposed on Venezuela. and that according to the administration of Nicolás Maduro, has prevented the nation from receiving some $232 billion in the last 10 years.

Just a few days ago, the Venezuelan leader assured that Venezuela would be the subject of a new “White House onslaught“, which involves, among other things, “stealing and dismembering” the Citgo Petroleum refiner, Venezuela’s main asset abroad.

#Joe #Biden #plans #extend #sanctions #Venezuela #year

Interview⁢ with Dr. ⁣Sarah Thompson, Political Analyst, ⁤on​ Biden’s Response to ​the Recent Attacks in ⁢Kabul

Editor: Thank you for joining us today,‍ Dr. Thompson. President Biden ​recently vowed to take revenge ⁣on ISIS following the ​tragic attack in Kabul. ‌What do ⁢you see as the​ implications of this response?

Dr. ‌Thompson: ‌ Thank ​you for having⁤ me. President ‍Biden’s⁣ commitment to retaliate against ISIS sends ⁣a strong ‍message that the U.S.‍ will not ⁣tolerate attacks on its personnel or allies. It illustrates the administration’s emphasis on national security and the importance of a decisive response to terrorism.

Editor: How might this retaliation‌ impact U.S. relations with Afghanistan‌ and the⁢ surrounding region?

Dr. Thompson: It’s a complex ‍situation. While​ a military response might bolster U.S. credibility in the fight against terrorism, it could also⁣ strain relations with the Taliban, who have been wary of ISIS’s presence. ‍Additionally, ⁤neighboring countries ⁢may react differently, perhaps fearing spillover effects or retaliatory strikes.

Editor: Do you believe this action could ⁤lead ⁢to a prolonged conflict in the region?

Dr. Thompson: Yes, there’s a risk ⁤of escalation. Retaliatory actions can create a cycle​ of‌ violence.⁤ If the U.S. strikes ISIS strongholds, they may respond in⁤ kind, leading‍ to broader instability. It’s crucial ​for the Biden administration to ‌consider a balanced​ approach that includes‍ diplomatic efforts alongside military⁣ action.

Editor: ⁣what can we expect from the Biden‍ administration in the weeks to come‍ regarding this‍ situation?

Dr. Thompson: I anticipate we will​ see a mix of military readiness and diplomatic engagement. ⁤The administration will likely seek ⁣to build coalitions with allies to address ‌the ISIS threat collectively while also looking for ways to stabilize‍ Afghanistan through humanitarian aid and support for governance.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for ⁢your​ insights on this pressing issue.

Dr. ⁤Thompson: ⁤My pleasure,⁢ thank you!

Ibility and deter future attacks, it could also strain relations with the new Taliban-led government in Afghanistan. The Taliban has a vested interest in showcasing its ability to maintain stability and control, and U.S. military actions could be perceived as undermining that authority. Moreover, neighboring countries may react apprehensively, fearing potential spillover effects from any renewed U.S. military presence in the area.

Editor: President Biden has also extended Executive Order 13,692 concerning Venezuela, citing it as an “extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security. What are your thoughts on this decision and its implications for U.S.-Venezuela relations?

Dr. Thompson: This extension signals that the Biden administration views the situation in Venezuela as a priority issue. By maintaining sanctions, the U.S. is trying to apply pressure on the Maduro government. However, this move could exacerbate tensions further and solidify anti-U.S. sentiment within Venezuela. It risks alienating the Venezuelan population, who are already suffering under economic constraints, potentially making open dialogue more difficult.

Editor: How do you see the Venezuelan government responding to these sanctions and the perceived “White House onslaught” as mentioned by President Maduro?

Dr. Thompson: Maduro’s administration is likely to frame these actions as an infringement on national sovereignty, rallying domestic support by tapping into nationalism. They may escalate their rhetoric against the U.S. and seek partnerships with countries that oppose American influence in the region. This could further entrench the division and complicate any diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing crisis in Venezuela.

Editor: Thank you for your insightful analysis, Dr. Thompson. It’s clear these developments have far-reaching implications both for the U.S. and the regions involved.

Dr. Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we continue to monitor these situations closely as they evolve.