The red robes against the government for ruining the policy on migrants. The attempt to boycott the agreement with Albania is no secret, but it is written in black and white, in an interview given to Repubblica on 10 December by Silvia Albano, the judge of the Immigration Section of the Court of Rome who yesterday issued the contested sentence with which it did not validate the detention of the twelve migrants transferred to the Italian detention center for the repatriation of Gjader. Not just any judge, but the emblem of those robes on the front line when the political opponent needs to be beaten.
Albano, in fact, is the president of the democratic judiciary, the left-wing current of the officials, in fibrillation in front of an Executive that goes straight on justice reform, so hated by that system described by the former president of the ANM Luca Palamara, as to be branded as a sort of “attack on the independence of the judiciary”, carried out by a government accused of wanting to “distort the democratic system”.
These are the words of the president, who on several occasions has raised the barricades against the migration policies of Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Salvini. The red robe number one has in fact taken the defense of her colleague Iolanda Apostolico, the judge from Catania who in 2018 demonstrated in front of the Diciotti ship for closed ports and who last October signed a series of measures not validating the detention of some illegal immigrants in repatriation centers, thus disapplying the Migrant Decree.
For Albano, faced with a preliminary question between Italian and European rules, Apostolico “as a judge of merit, had the right, or rather the duty, to disapply the internal rule”, he told the Manifesto.
Among other things, he had already warned the government that there would be open war over the agreement with Tirana. «I imagine there will be a shower of appeals on which we will have to decide. And if there is no ratification law that defines the exceptions to the national regulatory framework provided for by this protocol, we will only be able to take note of it”, Albano, architect of the sentence announced yesterday, declared to Repubblica, underlining that, in any case, ” changes in law must be compatible with European directives” and that “extraterritoriality requires a law, it is not declared with a protocol”. The rejection of those detentions at the Gjader center is based precisely on a ruling by the European Court of Justice following the preliminary ruling proposed by a judge from the Czech Republic and is motivated by the fact that Bangladesh and Egypt are not safe countries. And if they were, they might not be for that individual migrant.
Case by case and doors open to all, with a court that enters with a straight leg into a government project that Europe likes, ordering the return of those illegal immigrants “who have the right to be brought to Italy”, reiterated in a note by the president of the Immigration Section, Lucia Sangiovanni. The same Sangiovanni who rejected the decision of the Privacy Guarantor to stop the broadcast, on Rai, of some sensitive documents on Armando Siri, former undersecretary of the League. Sangiovanni ended up before the CSM, but pardoned, for the chats in which Palamara complained about the slowness of the separation procedure of a friend with the judge, who was employed in family law at the time.
«The colleague is in a little difficulty… we’ll talk about it verbally… I have the issue in mind», he replied to Palamara. The same Palamara who, to the chief prosecutor of Viterbo Paolo Auriemma, convinced that Salvini was doing nothing wrong regarding the closed ports, wrote: “In any case we must attack him.”
#Migrants #fan #judge #Apostolico #centers #Albania #year #Tempo
