Lawyer Masateru Kawaguchi (Osaka) suspended for 2 years (international romance fraud/non-beneficiary partnership) and requested by the association

Lawyer Masateru Kawaguchi (Osaka) suspended for 2 years (international romance fraud/non-beneficiary partnership) and requested by the association

Legal Shenanigans: The Curious Case of Masaki Kawaguchi

Well, hold onto your wigs, folks! We’ve got ourselves a legal drama that could outdo even the finest courtroom thrillers. This week, Masaki Kawaguchi, a lawyer fresh out of Shakespeare’s tales about ‘too good to be true,’ found himself suspended for two years due to some rather dubious dealings — and we’re not talking about discounted ramen joints in Osaka.

The Osaka Bar Association has cracked the whip, citing Kawaguchi for “partnering with a non-lawyer.” Now, I don’t know about you, but if I had a yen for every time I heard that phrase, I’d be a millionaire — oh wait…

Romance Frauds & Legal Blunders: A Match Made in… Not Heaven

What’s this lawyer been up to? It seems he was lending his shiny legal name to an advertising company that was running a rather nefarious romance scam. To put it lightly, Kawaguchi’s involvement has created a veritable smorgasbord of victims — about 1,800 to be precise, and they’re out nearly 960 million yen. That’s a lot of heartbreaks, and a lot of yen flying out the window!

Notably, there were virtually no procedures taken to recover the scammed funds, which makes you wonder if perhaps, just maybe, Kawaguchi thought he could sidestep accountability. But let’s be real — with that kind of financial nonsense, there’ll be no dodging the angry mob, or in this case, the bankruptcy trustee.

Consequences Are Not Just for Naught!

Now, this isn’t just a slap on the wrist, my friends. The decisions have been made, the gavel has dropped, and Kawaguchi is facing a bankruptcy that’s set to wrap up by the end of this month. A grand farewell to his legal career! Imagine hugging your beloved profession goodbye, only to realize you left your dignity on the other side of that door.

And what’s this about a two-year suspension? It feels a bit like an underwhelming season finale, doesn’t it? The Osaka Bar Association seems to think that a timeout is all he needs rather than a full-blown boot from the legal fraternity.

Citizens vs. Lawyers: Who’s in Charge Here?

Interestingly, there’s a layered drama going on with the disciplinary process itself. We’ve got “bar association claims” and complaints from the general public, and how’s that for a convoluted mess? The two-year suspension? Yeah, it was requested by the Osaka Bar Association — they want to keep this little debacle nicely contained within their own ranks. I can only assume they thought a nice timeout would help Kawaguchi get his act together, like a schoolboy sent to the corner with his preferred toy. But really, is the law school of hard knocks still operating?

Decisions, Decisions!

The big question looms: why the leniency? Why not just kick him to the curb permanently? Perhaps the Osaka Bar authorities were concerned that ordinary citizens asking for his head would end up being too harsh. You know, the whole “don’t get the amateurs involved in professional matters” sort of vibe. But let’s be honest here, it’s perplexing! After all, he admitted to most of the charges! The gentleman practically put a neon sign above his guilt! It’s as if they’re saying, “He can mislead the public, but let’s not be too hasty, shall we?”

Summing It Up

If nothing else, this saga serves as a tantalizing reminder that while lawyers dabble in law, they’re not always above making a monumental hash of it. As the bankruptcy process unfolds and the victims hopefully see some restitution, one thing’s for sure: this is one case that should have stayed in the closet! But hey, in the entertaining world of legal mischief, who could resist a sequel?

So here’s to the hope that the Osaka Bar Association finds its backbone and reevaluates its approach to handling wayward lawyers. Because let’s face it — 900 million yen in damages is not just a footnote in a history book; it’s a cautionary tale of what happens when legal ethics take a coffee break.

Written with a touch of wit and a sprinkle of sarcasm by a legal storyboarder who’s had more than a few cups of legal coffee.

Disciplinary action against lawyer for illicit partnership; damages exceed 900 million yen “created a large number of victims”

Alleged that he lent his lawyer’s name to an advertising company to perform legal work in order to collect money from romance fraud.On the 15th, the association imposed disciplinary action against Masaki Kawaguchi (39), a lawyer belonging to the Osaka Bar Association (pending trial), who was accused of violating the Lawyers Act (partnering with a non-lawyer), and was suspended from practice for two years. And so.Kawaguchi’s decision to commence bankruptcy is expected to be finalized by the end of this month, at which point he will lose his license to practice law. The association confirmed that it received a total of approximately 960 million yen in fees from approximately 1,800 clients. It is said that almost no procedures were taken to recover the damages, and vice-chairman Toshinobu Shimizu said, “It created a large number of victims. There are no such cases like this.” The Osaka District Court issued a decision to commence bankruptcy for Kawaguchi on the 2nd, and the decision is expected to be finalized on the 29th. The bankruptcy trustee will make repayments to the victims. The first criminal trial was held in September, and Kawaguchi admitted to the charges.

Association for considering lawyer autonomy

There are two types of disciplinary action against lawyers: “bar association claims,” in which the bar association is the party requesting disciplinary action, and disciplinary action filed by the general public.

The two-year suspension of attorney Masateru Kawaguchi’s practice issued by the Osaka Bar Association on October 15 turns out to be a request from the association.

Masaki KawaguchiRegistration number 54970 G&C Debt Collection Law Office 1-19-8 Nishitenma, Kita-ku, Osaka

Business suspended from October 15, 2024 to October 14, 2026

This is different from the punishment issued by the citizen in a separate case.

This is still under review.

Therefore, the person requesting disciplinary action requested a consolidated review and the sending of a resolution issued by the Osaka Bar Association at the request of a two-year suspension of business operations.

The Osaka Bar Association probably won’t deal with it.

It is inconceivable that what was voted and decided by the disciplinary committee would be re-annexed. A written resolution will not be issued to the person requesting disciplinary action. Please take a look at the Japan Federation of Bar Associations’ public relations magazine, “Freedom and Justice.”

So, why didn’t the Osaka Bar Association consolidate two disciplinary claims that requested the same disposition (there have been many consolidated reviews in the past)?

This time, the Osaka Bar Association decided that they would be responsible for the punishment of lawyers, and that it would be unbearable for lawyers to be fired by ordinary citizens who were amateurs! That’s probably what he was thinking.

If a joint review is conducted and a suspension of business for two years is issued, the citizens requesting disciplinary action will file an objection with the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, saying that the punishment is too lenient.

If the request is made by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, the Osaka Bar Association will not raise any objections to the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, and the disposition will be decided based on this.

First of all, if it were at any other association, we would never take disciplinary action.

This is because he has already filed for bankruptcy, has a criminal trial, and has admitted to most of the charges.

It is completely unclear why they issued a two-year suspension of operations at this timing. If he were to be expelled, the Osaka Bar Association would have made a harsh decision, but if he was suspended from practice for two years, he would be allowed to continue as a lawyer after two years.

What do you plan to do with disciplinary requests from citizens (disciplinary committee)? Once bankruptcy is decided, he is no longer a lawyer, so he probably has the courage to run away and say the disciplinary review is over.

After all, I don’t really understand the two-year suspension of business as ordered by the Osaka Bar Association!

Leave a Replay