The file of the Moroccan immigrant who demanded relief from disputes created against him by a lawyer is entering the deliberation stage.

Agadir 24 | Agadir24

The file of Moroccan immigrant Hussein Boukhier, who demanded relief from disputes created against him by a lawyer, has entered the deliberation stage, which is scheduled for October 17, 2024. .

Moroccan citizen Hussein Boukhier, residing in Europe, previously sent an open letter to the Chairman of the Justice, Legislation and Human Rights Committee of the House of Representatives in Rabat on the subject: Allegations of a lawyer in the Casablanca Authority.

Boukhaire detailed the issue of fabricated disputes against him and against his legitimate interests and rights by the so-called Mr. Mohamed Bouhi, a lawyer at the Casablanca Authority, who was pleading for him in some files and then suddenly switched from defense to attack and without warning.

Boukhaire confirmed that, after several successive mistakes and after extensive discussions with him that did not reach reasonable solutions, he found himself with files No. 136/137/293/294/385 T.H. of 2022 issued by the Casablanca Bar Association, which were issued to him. So far, the implementation files of No. 126/127/128/129 of 2023 have been filed at the Court of First Instance of Guelmim, which he, on his part, faced with a legal and administrative procedure, which is the permission to seize the property, which was placed in the Court of First Instance of Guelmim on June 19, 2024, where he requested the seizure of a group of privileges that The professor claims that he obtained it in the files he is pleading for, which is a group of real estate and hundreds of hectares of land that are priced at a high price (according to his expression). He also demanded and gave full powers to the esteemed court and the concerned authorities to do what is necessary so that the professor gets his full fees and transfers the rest. The property is transferred to charitable social institutions in the region.

Bukhir confirmed that he is the one claiming civil rights in all the files that the professor lawyer is defending, all of which concern proven and confirmed cases of forgery, and all of which also did not take their normal possible course related to the evidence of the files that were completely in his interest and rights. On the contrary, the results of most of the files were negative. In view of what we called the lawyer professor’s “complacency” and his lack of professionalism and professionalism,
For example, but not limited to:

File No. 653/2525/2020 at the Court of Appeal in Agadir, in which an agent of the authority (currently dismissed) forged his signature on an extradition certificate. Resolution No. 6690 in the same file, issued on December 24, 2020, stated in the form that the appeal of the civil rights claimant was not accepted, and after that it decided with Professor, it is necessary to submit the file to the Court of Cassation, and since the lawyer did not provide a comprehensive and detailed confirmation memorandum, this affected the course of the file negatively and against my personal and civil rights that I claim, as the Casablanca Court of Appeal ruled in File No. 124/1124/2023 by decision No. 30/2024, dated 03/28/2024, to cancel the decision taken and authorize again to refer the file to the Commission’s Council to continue the follow-up procedures. On the contrary, he was surprised that the lawyer insisted on implementing the ruling on 06/03/2024, three months after the consulting room’s decision was issued. He returned to demand the content of the decision issued by the President’s Office under No. 136 T.H. for the year 2022, amounting to a total of fifty-five thousand dirhams, even though he had received from him through a financial transfer the agreed-upon amount of nine thousand dirhams, which represents the total of his fees in this file.

Misdemeanor file No. 178/2801/2020 at the Guelmim Court of Appeal, relating to false witnesses who contributed and participated in making and using a document containing incorrect facts, and it is the file that issued a final and appellate ruling in my favor with an amount of compensation set at 30,000.00 (thirty thousand) dirhams only, The implementation file is ongoing to date today in the judicial departments of Guelmim, while Professor Mohamed Bouhi indicates in statement No. 162/1120/2022 addressed to the First President of the Court of Appeal in Casablanca, that he has not received his fees at all even though they were presented to him on 01/26/ 2021 request to withdraw copies of the executive and notification decision, there is an explicit permission to do so and implicitly for the end of the mutual relationship between them in this file, except that in the same aforementioned statement he indicates that his submission of the request to him resulted from his being ill at the time due to the repercussions of the Covid 19 epidemic, and the truth is He was present in court normally and attended his personal file session on 01/25/2020, and his name and presence were explicitly noted in the minutes of the session.

Misdemeanor file No. 1252/2101/2015 in the Court of First Instance in Guelmim related to forgery in the administrative management of the association, in which an employee of the Registry of the Court of First Instance in Guelmim forged the date of the instrument of appeal for compensation 05/25/2016 with 06/25/2016 falling on a Saturday outside of working days. This deprived him of his right and the right of the association to appeal, and thus the loss and failure of the file. Therefore, in my capacity as deputy secretary of the association, I filed a lawsuit against the clerk of record, file number 1295/7112/2019, in whose favor the amount of 20,260.00 (twenty thousand two hundred and sixty) was ruled. ) A dirham as compensation from the Ministry of Justice, which is still in the deposit box of lawyers at the Casablanca Authority, and in return, the lawyer, Mr. Mohamed Bouhi, demands from him in this file a total of fees that he specified in the fee determination files, Nos. 294 and 385 of 2022, in a total of 90,000.00 (ninety thousand) dirhams, which he specified. Mr. Captain’s Office in a total of 44,500.00 (forty-four thousand and five hundred) dirhams assessed in the current implementation file. It is an illogical amount, as it exceeds what was compensated for by the Ministry of Justice by more than double, and Bukhir wondered how I could extract an amount of money and pay more than double it, not to mention that the lawyer Professor Muhammad Bouhi informed him through the Judicial Commissioner, Professor Al-Hassan Ashaq, on the 16th. 03/2022 under No. 76/2022, including an “agreement” regarding fees set in the amount of 10,260.00 dirhams, which is more than half of the amount awarded to me, and despite the fact that he lost or forgot a group of receipts for the file expenses, which exceeded 2,500.00 dirhams, which he handed over to him with the intention of submitting them to the commissioner. The judiciary to present it in the performance report, which shows the recklessness and negligence of the lawyer professor and confirms what I am telling you, says Bukhir.

In this context, and in light of all the transgressions of the professor lawyer and his claims about obtaining valuable privileges (and the proof of whoever claimed), Bukhir requested, firstly, his support in finding a lawyer to plead for him against the professor lawyer Mohamed Buhi, given the abstention of many from doing so in a kind of context. Of sectoral solidarity, and even when I find those who accept or pretend to accept, they place it in the face of another inability linked to imaginary fees, which causes them to lose, along with everyone who lives in the same situation, their constitutional, legal and legitimate rights, due to the lawyers’ refusal to plead against other lawyers or to demand sums of money from them. In it.

Second: Research and scrutinize all the rulings issued in his files and issued by the Court of First Instance in Guelmim, with the aim of clarifying matters and identifying the truth and the shortcomings.

Third: Defending his right to follow up and research with Professor Mohamed Bouhi about the allegations that he presented in his book and in his files against him, while exploiting his experience and years of work first as a judge at the Rabat Court of Appeal until his retirement, and then currently joining the legal profession at the Casablanca Bar Association, he says. Al-Hussein Bukhir.

#file #Moroccan #immigrant #demanded #relief #disputes #created #lawyer #entering #deliberation #stage

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Table of Contents

On Key

Related Posts