Nabih Berri addressed Hezbollah‘s escalated actions against Israel, stating that these clashes significantly impact global peacemaking efforts.
Regarding the intensified national discussions about implementing Resolution 1559, he asserted that Resolution 1701 alone remains pertinent; Resolution 1559 is now obsolete.
Berri further stated that he and Prime Minister Najib Mikati are working diligently towards a ceasefire. He acknowledged the current fluctuations in tension, describing the overall situation as unstable.
- It reinforces its demand for complete adherence to Lebanon’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, unity, and political freedom, solely under the Lebanese government’s authority nationwide.
- It mandates the complete withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon.
- It urges the disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese militias.
- It supports the expansion of the Lebanese government’s control over all Lebanese territories.
- It declares its support for a free and fair electoral process in upcoming presidential elections, conducted according to the Lebanese Constitution without external interference.
- It calls upon all parties to fully cooperate with the Security Council to ensure complete implementation of this and all relevant resolutions for Lebanon’s restoration of territorial integrity, full sovereignty, and political independence.
- It directs the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council within thirty days on the parties’ implementation of this resolution and commits to continued involvement in the matter.
In contrast, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, unanimously approved on August 11, 2006, aimed to resolve the ongoing Lebanese-Israeli conflict. The Lebanese government endorsed the resolution on August 12, 2006.
The resolution dictates:
- A complete cessation of hostilities (paragraph 1).
- A simultaneous Israeli withdrawal of all forces from Lebanon and the deployment of Lebanese troops and UNIFIL throughout the south (paragraph 2).
- A long-term solution dependent on (paragraph 8).
- The disarmament of all armed groups within Lebanon.
- No armed forces, except UNIFIL and Lebanese forces (excluding Hezbollah and Israeli forces), south of the Litani River.
- No foreign troops in Lebanon without government approval.
- The provision of all maps of Lebanese landmines held by Israel to the United Nations.
Furthermore, the resolution confirms:
- The importance of the Lebanese government’s complete authority over Lebanon (paragraph 3).
- The urgent need to address the#Berri #Americans #expressing #backing #resolution #Lebanon #much #discussion #action
Berri’s Rejection of UN Resolution 1559: A Strategic Play or a Reckless Gamble?
The Lebanese political arena, already unstable, has experienced another seismic shift. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s recent pronouncements, downplaying the significance of UN Security Council Resolution 1559 while emphasizing escalating Israeli tensions, unveil a complex game plan – potentially a clever political tactic or a perilous escalation of an already precarious situation.
Berri’s dismissal of Resolution 1559 as insignificant is audacious. Resolution 1559, adopted in 2004, demanded the disarmament of Lebanese militias, including Hezbollah, and the withdrawal of all foreign troops. Berri’s rejection, given his close Hezbollah ties, signifies a repudiation of a core tenet of international consensus on Lebanon’s stability. This stance, amidst heightened Hezbollah-Israel clashes, is deeply troubling.
His justification – prioritizing Resolution 1701 (focused on ending the 2006 Lebanon War) – lacks substance. While 1701 addressed immediate conflict cessation, it didn’t negate Resolution 1559’s underlying concerns. By favoring short-term truces over long-term structural reform, Berri risks perpetuating Lebanon’s cycle of violence and instability.
This situation highlights inherent contradictions in Lebanon’s political system. Berri’s assertions of close cooperation with Prime Minister Mikati for a truce sharply contrast with his disregard for a crucial UN resolution aiming for lasting peace. This inconsistency points to a preference for short-term political gains over long-term national stability – a potentially devastating strategy.
The arguments made, seemingly supporting Lebanese sovereignty, territorial wholeness, and free elections, seem insincere considering Berri’s dismissal of Resolution 1559. These aspirations ring hollow if the issue of powerful non-state actors like Hezbollah operating outside government control remains unaddressed.
Berri might be trying to bolster Hezbollah’s influence by using current Israeli tensions. By framing the situation as a regional conflict requiring immediate de-escalation through talks instead of tackling Hezbollah’s armament, he may be deflecting international pressure. However, this tactic is high-risk. It risks alienating international partners, potentially hindering vital aid for Lebanon.
Berri’s declaration marks a crucial moment in Lebanon’s quest for stability. His rejection of Resolution 1559, alongside peace claims, showcases a troubling disconnect between words and actions. Whether this is a shrewd but risky political move or a dangerous miscalculation that further destabilizes Lebanon remains unclear. The international community needs to carefully assess its response, as inaction could severely harm Lebanon and the wider region.
<iframe allow="autoplay" width="580" height="380" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C_PN3rSb2Zo" frameborder=" rnrnBerri’s Rejection of UN Resolution 1559: A Strategic Play or a Reckless Gamble?
The Lebanese political landscape, already a volatile mix of sectarian tensions and international pressures, has been further destabilized by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s recent pronouncements. His dismissal of UN Security Council Resolution 1559 as obsolete, while simultaneously stressing the urgency of Resolution 1701 amidst escalating Hezbollah-Israel clashes, presents a perplexing scenario—a calculated political maneuver or a dangerous escalation?
Berri’s audacious claim that Resolution 1559, adopted in 2004 to disarm Lebanese militias (including Hezbollah) and demand the withdrawal of foreign forces, is irrelevant is alarming. This statement, particularly given his close ties to Hezbollah, represents a direct challenge to a long-standing pillar of international efforts to stabilize Lebanon. The timing, coinciding with increased cross-border tensions, only exacerbates concerns.
His argument for prioritizing Resolution 1701, focusing on the 2006 war’s cessation, rings hollow. While 1701 provided an immediate ceasefire, it didn’t supersede the fundamental concerns addressed in Resolution 1559. Berri’s apparent prioritization of short-term ceasefires over the long-term structural reforms demanded by Resolution 1559 suggests a willingness to perpetuate Lebanon’s cycle of violence – a dangerous gamble that ignores the root causes of instability.
The inherent contradictions within Berri’s statements further underscore the fragility of Lebanon’s political system. His claim of working with Prime Minister Mikati towards a ceasefire directly clashes with his dismissal of a resolution crucial for lasting peace. This apparent double-dealing reveals a system where short-term political gain potentially outweighs the pursuit of lasting stability.
The international community, particularly the UN, faces a critical juncture. Ignoring Berri’s blatant disregard for Resolution 1559 will embolden Hezbollah and further destabilize the region. A robust response, potentially involving targeted sanctions or diplomatic pressure, is needed to reassert the importance of disarmament and the withdrawal of foreign forces—core tenets of lasting peace in Lebanon. Failing to do so risks normalizing the erosion of international norms and setting a dangerous precedent for future conflicts. Berri’s actions might be a strategic gambit, but the potential consequences could be catastrophic for Lebanon and the region. The international community must act decisively to prevent this reckless gamble from escalating into a full-blown crisis.
