Meeting the numbers for constitutional amendments became a problem for the government, with the government instructing its MPs abroad to return by October 15 anyway.
According to details, the government is facing difficulties in the number game on the issue of constitutional amendments, members were recalled from overseas trips to meet the required number.
The government has issued instructions to its parliamentarians abroad to return by October 15 in any case to ensure their participation in voting on the constitutional amendments.
According to sources, currently 10 to 15 government members of the National Assembly and Senate are outside the country, among them Dr. Tariq Fazal Chaudhry and Syed Khurshid Shah of the People’s Party.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
Among the senators, Rana Mehmoodul Hasan of the People’s Party, Dinesh Kumar of the BAP Party are present abroad while Senator Abdul Qadir has also gone on a visit abroad.
News of Fazlur Rahman’s conditional consent to constitutional amendment, JUI leader’s big statement
On the other hand, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MNA Riaz Fatiana and Senator Faisal Saleem are also out of the country.
It should be noted that in an interview yesterday, Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the government would like the constitutional amendments to be approved before October 25. We wish to pass the amendment by consensus. PPP does not want members to be bought and sold for constitutional amendment.
#Numbers #Game #Constitutional #Amendment #Special #Instructions #Issued #Government #Members #Pakistan
Amendments to the Constitution can be proposed by
Analysis: The Elusive Task of Securing Constitutional Amendments
As a seasoned blog news writer, I recently came across an article that highlights the challenges governments face in securing constitutional amendments. The article in question reveals that a government has instructed its Members of Parliament (MPs) abroad to return by October 15, despite struggling to meet the required numbers for constitutional amendments. This predicament raises interesting questions about the intricacies of constitutional change and the hurdles governments must overcome to achieve it.
Interestingly, a look at the history of constitutional amendments in the United States reveals that gaps in their ratification can be quite significant. According to the Constitution Center [[1]], there was a 40-plus-year gap between the 15th and 16th Amendments. This gap underscores the often laborious process of securing constitutional amendments, which can be influenced by various factors such as changing societal values, shifting political landscapes, and the challenges of achieving consensus.
The Progressive era, spanning from 1913 to 1920, witnessed the introduction of the 16th through 19th Amendments [[1]]. These amendments not only expanded the federal government’s authority but also addressed issues such as women’s suffrage and the prohibition of alcohol. The ratification of these amendments demonstrates that governments can overcome the hurdles associated with constitutional changes, but the process often requires significant time and effort.
Fast-forwarding to more recent times, the ratification of the 27th Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1992 is a testament to the persistence required to secure constitutional changes [[2]],[[3]]. This amendment, which deals with congressional pay raises, was initially proposed in 1789 but did not gain enough support for ratification until over two centuries later.
In light of these historical examples, it is clear that constitutional amendments can be a difficult and time-consuming process. Governments must navigate complex political landscapes, build consensus among stakeholders, and navigate the intricacies of constitutional law. The challenges faced by governments in securing constitutional amendments are not unique to any particular country or region but rather reflect the fundamental complexities of constitutional change.
the article highlighting the struggles of a government to meet the required numbers for constitutional amendments serves as a reminder of the often-daunting task of securing constitutional changes. As demonstrated by the history of constitutional amendments in the United States, this process can be influenced by a range of factors and may require significant time and effort to achieve. As governments continue to grapple with the challenges of constitutional change, it is essential to remain aware of the complexities involved and the importance of building consensus around the process.
