2024-10-09 23:45:00
Today, political and social scientists debate whether this cycle is driven by Javier Miley Ten months ago was Argentina’s fourth new dictatorship, after the previous military dictatorship (1976-1983), the Menimist decade (1989-1999) and the government led by Mauricio Macri from 2015 to 2019. The liberal cycle.
From my perspective, I think not. This is another story. It’s not even going down the same path, but moving faster, and this administration is emblematic of an attempt at a deeper rupture: it is. Nothing comes from the state, everything comes from the market to the beast.
he liberalism Classicism holds that state institutions should not interfere with the economy and let it operate according to the natural laws of supply and demand. But it also stipulates that they should be responsible for the administration of health, education, justice and security, as the state will recoup every peso invested in a healthy working population through vocational training.
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
“Education, health, housing, creating real jobs are not prioritized and there is no promotion of production and added value in our regional economy.”
Under the influence of Mrs. Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, the neoliberal paradigm prescribed unilateral opening of the economy, state reform, privatization of public companies, tax reform, deregulation, reduction of public spending, and maintenance of economic balance. In this plan, the state must promote large-scale infrastructure (with the participation of the private sector) and develop regulations for health and education services, although their management remains in the hands of provincial and municipal governments. It also considers the implementation of targeted social policies aimed at containing victims of adjustment, e.g. The government of Carlos Menem introduced the Solidarity Bonus and subsequent work program in 1995.
Poverty rate rises to 52.9%, affecting nearly 25 million people
President Milley made his vision for the country very clear in his speech introducing the 2025 National Budget. He pointed out that he must be responsible There are only three axes: managing macroeconomic variables; international relations; and administration of justicefor the purpose of protecting private property. These are its functions. The remainder correspond to provinces, municipalities or the private sector. If not, don’t let anyone do it, and by and large, there is no market failure.
This is an “overflow” idea, but without any national component; “We are witnessing the dissection of nonsense, meaningless experiments.”
There is no priority in education, health, housing, genuine job creation, and no promotion of production and added value in our regional economy. There are not even policies to compensate those with more complexities. There was no room for universities and state hospitals, nor for public works, let alone managing public transport. Medium and long-distance services are not for the purpose of raising interest rates for indebted households, nor are they for protecting the living rights of people who rely on electricity.
Well, we face a different cycle, one that seeks very profound modifications. This is an absolute withdrawal of the state, based on the idea that without any type of regulation of the private sector, the state will function normally and development will not suffer any type of setback. Once it starts to work, it will eventually integrate society. In a way, this is an “overflow” idea, but it has nothing to do with the country. We are witnessing the dissection of nonsense, meaningless experiments, which leads us to a model in which one-third of the population is integrated and globalized, while two-thirds are detached from everything.
It’s clear that our society has changed profoundly in recent years, and many people are voting in the November 2023 runoff elections feeling overwhelmed by the state’s existence. We knew we couldn’t go back to the recipes of the past.
It is the responsibility of those of us who face the far-right model embodied by this government to create new ideas, towards a model of balance between the state and the market, towards a model of development and planning based on national consensus, because Argentina needs more markets, but.
*National representative (Fatherland Alliance)
1728518806
#anatomy #nonsense
