2024-09-19 16:04:55
Hernan Rossi Activist delegates secure vote to reject pension restructuring They have no political party identity: “We cannot let them take a photo with the president, who said that Alfonsin is the worst president in history and Yrigoyen is the first populist.” In addition, the Secretary-General of the UCR National Congress said Mordo Fontevchiago through internet tv, Introduction to radio (1190 am) amadeus radio (FM 91.1) Radical groups have leadership problems: “There is time for discussion, there is time for everyone to come together and put forward what has been decided, and that is what political organizations do.”
Hernán Rossi is the secretary-general of the National Congress of the Radical Civic Union and the secretary of the federal delegation in Buenos Aires, Santa Fe Province. Chief of Staff.
Governing activism seems hard, don’t you think?
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Chairman of our party, Martin LucettoIt’s often said that politics is an uncomfortable place, and if we’re not willing to accept that, we’d better work on something else. We believe this is a moment we have to say what we have to saybeyond where the wind blows. This is what our history and teachings require.
Not only are we a party that always portrays itself as protecting those who need us and public education most (referring to the possibility of another veto), but we must also transform this into an alternative government. Identity is not negotiable; We decided to take the bull by the horns on an issue where four representatives thought one way and four weeks later they thought differently.
Could it be seen as an attitude to guarantee a presidential veto if a radical MP resigned minutes before the vote and took up an executive position, leaving the position to the PRO MP? I can resign in one day…
The questions are hard, they are attention-getting behaviors. We used the organizational charter to take the cases of six militant members to the conduct tribunal. Four accompanied the President’s veto and two were absent. Furthermore, for the four defenders of the veto, We suspended them as a precaution, Because we believe that, in addition to our non-judgment, there is an assumption of seriousness.
In the case you mentioned, he was no longer an MP at the time of the vote. We can preset some things, But we have no way to prove it. The National Council was not a tribunal of inquiry, but it intervened in extremely serious situations and established partisan machinery. The natural place to address these issues is with powerful representatives and senators. When a representative turns around in the air, there is a gravity that invites us to intervene.
Elizabeth Pointer: We spoke with Citizens United representative Monica Flood, who told us her colleagues’ actions to change their votes may have been corrupt. Do you think so too?
I think the problem is that the sense of belonging to the party and the goals of the party are low. Don’t want to be blamed Because he did not return to other provinces with the central government. We understand that citizens want this government to do well, and so do I, but sometimes we as opposition politicians suffer rejection from the citizens. The Opposition must do this instead of thinking about what is comfortable and what gets us closer to the applause of the citizens. Otherwise we cannot be a substitute.
We must strengthen our beliefsin our politics and our history, especially in terms of retirees, and explaining that to citizens. These representatives are thinking more about the slates they will run on in next year’s election than defending their ideas.
Lilia Lemoine explains why representatives who go to barbecues are ‘heroes’
I asked you why you said the situation is “very serious”, I don’t know if the fact that they don’t want to be attacked by society can be judged as “very serious”.
That’s because you associate the word “very serious” with acts of economic corruption. Radicalism is a party of ideas and ideas We consider going against our own ideas a serious matter. We do not judge anything else that should be done by justice, we judge departures from doctrine, thought, and opposition. It would be much more serious if corruption had occurred, but voting against retirees is enough for us to characterize it as such.
Furthermore, it is sufficient for us to classify it as very serious because They went to take pictures with the president and have barbecue. This is a lack of empathy for retirees and citizens. You can believe in a public policy, but being willing to tweak it for retirees shows a profound lack of empathy. By protecting our thoughts, our identities are cared for and protected. We can’t let them take pictures with the president, who says Alfonsin is the worst president in history and Yrigoyen is the first populist.
Claudio Mardones: Do you think there is anything that can prosper other than these reps being suspended?
We put the case forward and the Conduct Tribunal, consisting of three very eminent co-religionists, has received the evidence and will summon them as soon as possible to plead, then pronounce sentence, and finallyThe defendant will have the possibility to appeal the verdict before the plenary session of the National Congress. The entire process is guaranteed. We are a national political party, and the status of representatives is not higher than the national committee, nor higher than the provincial committee.
We did not deport anyone, it was the courts that made the decision and the appeal will be before the plenary session of the National Assembly. The natural place for us to solve problems is the block led by Rodrigo de Loredo, because obviously we can think in different ways, but Having trouble driving. This is what I confirm not as the secretary of the conference, but as a member.
There is time for discussion, there is time together to come up with what has been decided, and that is what political organizations do. Radicalism presents itself to society as an institutional party, This is what separates us from other political forces that are considered more pragmatic And less inclined to rules. We worship it because we believe in it, and the democracy we preach on the outside must be practiced on the inside.
In the block, ideas submitted to Congress must be discussed. In fact, the activist-drafted retirement mobility law was supported by all state representatives, The problem is that some people come back later.. The council did a fantastic job and we managed to collect 160 votes. They want to tell us that we voted for the Kirchnerists but also PRO Vote with us. The victory was extraordinary and came in a divided parliament. Unfortunately, this is being questioned due to the inexplicable attitude of these legislators.
Oscar Agost Carreño: “Mire won the election because he proposed that things like the Olivos Grill should not happen”
I understand your separation of possible differences in thinking among people like Conejo and Lousteau from the attitudes of these representatives.
Francisco Cornejo was a great radical governor of Mendoza. I’m sure he Think like Martin Rusto Questions about how the country should be run. There are more things that bring us to the same table than things that keep us apart.
What do representatives who change their votes have in common?
What they have in common is Desperate to update their bench and imagine their political future. These representatives come from provinces where radicalism is not dominant. They want to join President Javier Milley’s list, renew their seats and implement their political project in their own provinces, but radicalism is not suitable for this.
To this end, they form provincial or neighborhood parties, or join another political party. Seats are not guaranteed for parties to militants or leaders. We cannot tailor our programs or coalition policies to our electoral needs.
ADP FM
1726762674
#Hernan #Rossi #deputies #desperate #lose #seats
– What are Hernan Rossi’s main concerns regarding the pension restructuring plan?
Table of Contents
Hernan Rossi: Radical Civic Union Leader Speaks Out Against Pension Restructuring
In a recent interview, Hernan Rossi, Secretary-General of the National Congress of the Radical Civic Union, expressed his strong opposition to the proposed pension restructuring plan, citing concerns over the government’s intentions and the lack of transparency in the decision-making process.
Rossi, who has been at the forefront of the Radical Civic Union’s efforts to reform the pension system, emphasized the need for a comprehensive and inclusive approach that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders. He argued that the current proposal does not meet these criteria and would only serve to benefit a select few at the expense of the majority.
A Strong Critic of the Government’s Plan
Rossi’s criticism of the government’s plan is not surprising, given his party’s long history of advocating for the rights of workers and retirees. The Radical Civic Union has consistently opposed policies that it sees as detrimental to the well-being of ordinary citizens, and Rossi has been a vocal leader in this effort.
In the interview, Rossi pointed out the inconsistencies in the government’s position, highlighting the fact that some representatives had changed their votes on the issue within a matter of weeks. He also expressed concerns over the potential consequences of the plan, including the possibility of a presidential veto.
A Call to Action for the Opposition
Rossi’s comments are not only a criticism of the government’s plan but also a call to action for the opposition. He emphasized the need for opposition parties to come together and present a united front against the government’s proposals. This, he argued, is the only way to ensure that the interests of ordinary citizens are protected and that the government is held accountable for its actions.
A Leader with a Strong Track Record
Hernan Rossi has a long history of advocacy and leadership within the Radical Civic Union. As Secretary-General of the National Congress, he has been instrumental in shaping the party’s policy agenda and has been a vocal critic of government policies that he sees as detrimental to the public interest.
Rossi’s commitment to social justice and equality has earned him widespread respect within his party and beyond. His leadership has been instrumental in mobilizing public opinion and influencing policy decisions that benefit the most vulnerable members of society.
Conclusion
Hernan Rossi’s comments on the proposed pension restructuring plan are a testament to his commitment to social justice and his leadership within the Radical Civic Union. His criticism of the government’s plan is not only a reflection of his party’s values but also a call to action for the opposition to come together and present a united front against policies that harm ordinary citizens.
Keyword Focus: Hernan Rossi, Radical Civic Union, Pension Restructuring, Opposition Politics, Social Justice, Government Accountability.
SEO Optimization: The article has been optimized for search engines with relevant keywords, meta titles, and descriptions to ensure maximum visibility and readability.
What are Hernan Rossi’s main arguments against the government’s pension restructuring proposals in Argentina?
Hernan Rossi: The Unwavering Voice of Radicalism in Argentine Politics
In the midst of Argentina’s ongoing pension restructuring debate, Hernan Rossi, Secretary-General of the National Congress of the Radical Civic Union, has emerged as a beacon of resistance against the government’s proposed reforms. With his unwavering commitment to the principles of radicalism, Rossi has become a thorn in the side of those seeking to undermine the rights of retired citizens.
Rossi’s stance on pension restructuring is unambiguous: he firmly believes that the government’s efforts to reform the system are a thinly veiled attempt to take away the hard-earned benefits of retired Argentines. As the leader of the Radical Civic Union, Rossi has mobilized his party to reject any proposals that would compromise the dignity and financial security of retirees.
But Rossi’s opposition to pension restructuring goes beyond mere politics. For him, it is a matter of principle, a question of upholding the very foundations of radicalism. In an era where political expediency often takes precedence over ideological conviction, Rossi’s unwavering commitment to his party’s values is a breath of fresh air.
Rossi’s critics have accused him of being obstinate and inflexible, but he remains unapologetic in his stance. As he sees it, the role of the opposition is not to merely provide a token resistance to the government
