The Brief Yet Impactful Saga of Naom: A Cultural Initiative’s Fleeting Existence

The Brief Yet Impactful Saga of Naom: A Cultural Initiative’s Fleeting Existence

The artist Malin Bernalt‘s jewelry has been for sale in Naom‘s shop, but despite several reminders during the summer, she has not been paid. Now she is worried that she will neither get the jewelery back – nor payment.

– It puts me in a vulnerable situation as an artist. I’ve gotten rid of a large part of my collection, something I’ve been working on for three years, says Malin Bernalt and continues:

– I hope to get them back, but now they belong to the bankruptcy estate. They are simply seen as purchased by the company, even though I haven’t been paid.

Olov Kling, who is the bankruptcy administrator, confirms that the jewelry now belongs to the bankruptcy estate, but that the outstanding invoice can be directed there.

– Regarding the works that have been handed over to the museum, but the payment has not been made, the preliminary assessment is that the property is included in the bankruptcy.

Non-payments

Kulturnyheterna has also been in contact with several artists who have had exhibitions at Naom during the summer, but who have not been paid in full according to the contracts. But they do not, unlike Malin Bernalt whose jewelry was sold in the store, have to worry about their works according to the bankruptcy trustee.

– The works that are part of the exhibitions are lent by the artists. There, the preliminary assessment is that the artworks are not included in the bankruptcy and that the artists have separation rights to them, says Olov Kling.

Opened last summer

When Naom opened last summer, the ambition was to renew what a museum could be. On 3,200 square meters in central Stockholm, exhibitions, cocktail bar, restaurant, live stages and a perfumery were mixed. The tank was an “epicenter of creativity”.

Behind the venture are Angelica Broman and her father Janne Broman, who previously founded Fotografiska, backed by private investors. But already after a few months, the company has gone bankrupt.

“Unfortunately, it has been difficult to get a capital injection right now, which, in combination with low visitor numbers this summer, therefore made bankruptcy inevitable,” writes CEO Angelica Broman in a comment to Kulturnyheterna.

“We are very sorry about this situation as many are affected, especially our employees, suppliers and partners. “

​What are the potential⁣ impacts of Naom’s bankruptcy on artists ⁣like‌ Malin Bernalt and their work?

Artist Malin Bernalt Fears Losing Jewellery Collection to Bankruptcy Estate After Non-Payment from Naom ⁤Shop

As an ⁣artist, there’s ⁤nothing more devastating than not only being owed payment for your work but‍ also losing control over it due to circumstances beyond your control. This is the nightmare ​that ⁢artist Malin Bernalt is currently facing, as her​ jewellery collection, sold ⁤in Naom’s⁣ shop, remains unpaid, and now, with the shop’s bankruptcy, she ‌risks⁢ losing her entire collection.

A ‍Summer of Uncertainty

Malin Bernalt, an artist with a three-year-old jewellery‌ collection, entrusted ​her work to Naom’s shop,⁣ a ⁣recently opened⁢ museum⁤ and shop in central Stockholm. Despite several reminders throughout the summer, she ⁣has yet‌ to​ receive payment for her sold ⁤jewellery. ⁢With Naom’s bankruptcy, Bernalt⁢ is ‌now worried that she will neither get her ⁣jewellery back nor receive payment.

“It puts me ‍in ⁢a vulnerable ​situation‍ as an artist. I’ve gotten⁢ rid‍ of a large​ part of my collection, something ​I’ve been working⁢ on for three years,” ‍says a ​distraught ⁢Malin Bernalt. “I hope to get them back, but now they belong to the⁢ bankruptcy estate. They ​are simply seen as purchased by ⁢the company, even though I haven’t ⁣been‍ paid.”

Bankruptcy​ Estate Claims Jewellery

Olov Kling, the bankruptcy administrator,​ confirms that the ⁣jewellery now belongs⁢ to the bankruptcy ⁢estate, but notes that the outstanding invoice can be directed there. According to Kling,⁢ “Regarding the works that ⁣have been handed over‍ to ‌the museum, but ⁢the payment has not been made, ​the preliminary assessment is that the ⁢property is included in the⁤ bankruptcy.”

Other Artists ⁣Affected by Non-Payment

Malin Bernalt’s case is not an​ isolated ‌incident. Several‌ artists⁢ who have had exhibitions at Naom during the ⁤summer have ‍reported non-payment ‌or incomplete payment according to their contracts.​ While these artists are⁤ entitled to reclaim their⁤ exhibited artworks, as ⁣they were lent to the museum, they still face financial loss.

Naom’s Ambitious Concept

Naom, which opened last summer, aimed to revolutionize ‍the traditional museum concept by combining exhibitions, ‌a cocktail bar, restaurant, live stages, and ‌a shop⁣ across 3,200 square meters in central‍ Stockholm. Unfortunately, the museum’s bold experiment has ended in financial failure, leaving ⁣artists like Malin Bernalt in ⁢a precarious position.

What’s Next for Artists?

As Naom’s ⁢bankruptcy proceedings unfold, Malin ⁢Bernalt⁤ and other affected artists⁢ are⁤ left to navigate the complexities of financial reclamation and artistic ownership. While the ⁤fate of Naom’s assets⁤ remains uncertain, one thing⁤ is clear: artists must be vigilant in protecting their ⁢rights and interests, especially when collaborating ‍with businesses and organizations.

Key Takeaways

Artist Malin Bernalt is⁢ facing financial loss and potential loss of ​control over her jewellery collection due to Naom’s non-payment and bankruptcy.

Naom’s bankruptcy administrator, Olov Kling, confirms ‌that the jewellery collection now belongs‍ to the bankruptcy estate, but the outstanding invoice can be directed there.

Other artists have reported non-payment or incomplete payment for their exhibited artworks ‍at‍ Naom.

The exhibition of​ artworks in Naom’s museum ⁤was on a ⁤lending basis,​ allowing artists to reclaim their works,⁤ unlike Malin ​Bernalt’s ​sold jewellery.

* Artists must prioritize their rights and interests ⁢when collaborating with businesses and organizations to avoid similar situations.

By shedding⁤ light⁣ on this⁢ unfortunate ⁣incident, we hope to raise awareness about‌ the importance of artists’ rights and⁤ the need for better protections in the art industry.

– How can artists protect their rights when collaborating with galleries or shops like Naom?

The Dark Side of Creativity: Malin Bernalt’s Jewelry Caught in Naom’s Bankruptcy

In the world of art and creativity, behind every masterpiece lies a story of passion, dedication, and sometimes, unfortunate fate. Malin Bernalt, a talented artist, is facing a daunting situation as her jewelry pieces, which were on sale in Naom’s shop, are now stuck in the midst of the company’s bankruptcy. The predicament raises concerns about the vulnerability of artists in such situations and the potential consequences of non-payments.

Non-payments: A Growing Concern

Malin Bernalt’s story is a stark reminder of the risks artists take when collaborating with galleries or shops. Despite multiple reminders, she has not received payment for her jewelry pieces sold during the summer. The situation has left her in a vulnerable position, with her collection, which she has been working on for three years, now belonging to the bankruptcy estate. “I hope to get them back, but now they belong to the bankruptcy estate. They are simply seen as purchased by the company, even though I haven’t been paid,” she says.

Olov Kling, the bankruptcy administrator, confirms that the jewelry is now part of the bankruptcy estate, but notes that the outstanding invoice can be directed there. However, this does not guarantee Bernalt’s recovery of her work or payment.

Opened Last Summer: Naom’s Ambitious Venture

Naom, a museum-cum-gallery space, opened its doors last summer with the aim of redefining the concept of a museum. With a 3,200-square-meter space in central Stockholm, it promised to be an “epicenter of creativity.” Behind the venture were Angelica Broman and her father Janne Broman, who previously founded Fotografiska, backed by private investors.

Despite its ambitious start, Naom’s venture came to an abrupt end due to a lack of capital injection and low visitor numbers, leading to bankruptcy. CEO Angelica Broman expressed her regret over the situation, acknowledging the impact on employees, suppliers, and partners.

What are the Potential Impacts of Naom’s Bankruptcy on Artists like Malin Bernalt and their Work?

Naom’s bankruptcy has far-reaching consequences for artists like Malin Bernalt. The situation highlights the need for artists to protect their rights and interests when collaborating with galleries or shops. Non-payments can be devastating for artists, who often invest their time, effort, and resources into creating their work.

Olov Kling, the bankruptcy administrator, offers some solace to artists who have lent their work to Naom for exhibitions. According to him, these artworks are not part of the bankruptcy estate, and the artists have separation rights to them.

However, the incident serves as a stark reminder to artists to be cautious when partnering with businesses and to ensure that they have watertight contracts in place. Malin Bernalt’s story is a testament to the importance of protecting one’s creative endeavors and intellectual property.

the saga of Malin Bernalt’s jewelry and Naom’s bankruptcy serves as a cautionary tale for artists, galleries, and shops to prioritize transparency, fair business practices, and the protection of creative rights. As the art world continues to evolve, it is crucial to ensure that the creators of art are given the respect, compensation, and protection they deserve.

Keywords: Malin Bernalt, Naom, bankruptcy, jewelry, art, artists, intellectual property, creative rights, business practices.

Meta Description: Artist Malin Bernalt’s jewelry is stuck in Naom’s bankruptcy, highlighting the vulnerability of artists in such situations. What are the potential impacts of Naom’s bankruptcy on artists like Malin Bernalt and their work?

Leave a Replay