In the case of elections in 90 days, the Supreme Court has issued a written order of judicial proceedings, in which it has been said that the elections of the national and provincial assemblies will be held on February 8. In the written order of the Supreme Court, it was said that the misuse of the constitutional freedom of expression is intended to undermine democracy.
The written order said that the media has a very important role, the Constitution of Pakistan has given freedom of expression in Article 19, the constitutional freedom of expression is used by some people as a license to create false narratives and spread wrong information.
According to the decree, PEMRA bans constitutional violations, there should be fair comment for the improvement of democracy, lack of trust in democracy reduces public participation as well as voter turnout, according to a study by the European Parliament, wrong information. Proliferation undermines democracy.
The written decree said that according to the research of the European Parliament, false information threatens the right to freedom of thought, privacy, economic, social and cultural rights, according to the research of the European Parliament.
According to the European Parliament’s research, misinformation not only creates distrust in democratic institutions, but also undermines free and transparent elections, digital violence and coercion increases due to misinformation. .
According to the decree, the Supreme Court commends the journalists for carrying out their duties professionally with truth, keeping the importance of the matter in front, the translation of this decision will also be issued in Urdu.
According to the decree, the National Assembly was dissolved on the advice of the Prime Minister on August 9. The President was bound to give a date for holding the elections in ninety days. The general elections could not be held in ninety days because the seventh census had been notified. was
Apart from this, the seventh census was required under the constitution before the new elections. The Election Commission decided to delimit the constituencies based on the new census. Under Article 224(2), the constitutional requirement is that the grounds for the dissolution of the assembly are general. Elections are in ninety days.
In the order, it was said that it took 6 years to approve the sixth census, due to which the seventh census and constituencies were delayed. All the lawyers told the court that elections are not possible in ninety days. No reply was given to the letter.
According to the decree, the court got into trouble due to the President’s letter and the position of the Election Commission. The Constitution and the law do not have the authority of the court to set the date of the election. The President did not approach the court under Article 186, including the President and the Election Commission. Everyone should do what the constitution intends.
According to the decree of the Supreme Court, following the constitution is not an option but a responsibility. If any institution interferes with the constitutional boundaries of another, the consequences will be serious. The dispute between the President and the Election Commission was unnecessarily brought to the Supreme Court. And did not interfere in the affairs of the Election Commission.
According to the decree, the whole country was worried about the date of the elections, some people were worried that the elections might not take place. Facilitated the determination.
In the written decision of the Supreme Court, it was said that the bigger the constitutional position, the greater the responsibility. It is the basic duty of every citizen to follow the constitution. The president, chief election commissioner and members are bound by the oath taken under the constitution.
#written #decision #general #election #case #issued #days
2024-09-19 02:40:04
What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s order on freedom of expression during the upcoming elections?
Table of Contents
Supreme Court Issues Written Order on Elections: Ensuring Democracy and Constitutional Freedom
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued a written order on the upcoming national and provincial assembly elections, slated to take place on February 8. The court’s order emphasizes the importance of upholding democracy and constitutional freedom, while cautioning against the misuse of freedom of expression.
Freedom of Expression vs. Misinformation
The written order highlights the crucial role of the media in promoting democracy, as enshrined in Article 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan. However, it notes that some individuals misuse this constitutional freedom to create false narratives and spread misinformation. This not only undermines democracy but also erodes public trust and participation in the electoral process.
Citing research by the European Parliament, the court’s order underscores the detrimental effects of misinformation on democracy. False information threatens not only the right to freedom of thought but also privacy, economic, social, and cultural rights. Moreover, it creates distrust in democratic institutions, undermines free and transparent elections, and fuels digital violence and coercion.
Fair Comment and Media Responsibility
The Supreme Court commends journalists who discharge their duties professionally, upholding the truth and highlighting the importance of the matter at hand. The court’s order encourages fair comment and responsible media practices, essential for the improvement of democracy.
Election Timeline and Constitutional Requirements
The written order outlines the events leading up to the upcoming elections. The National Assembly was dissolved on August 9, and the President was bound to set a date for holding elections within ninety days. However, the seventh census, a constitutional requirement, had not been completed, making it impossible to hold general elections within the stipulated timeframe.
The Election Commission’s decision to delimit constituencies based on the new census further complicated the process. The court’s order emphasizes that the constitutional requirement is for general elections to be held in ninety days, with the seventh census and constituency delimitation being essential preconditions.
Challenges and Controversies
The order reveals that it took six years to approve the sixth census, causing delays in the seventh census and constituency delimitation. All parties involved concurred that elections could not be held within ninety days, but no formal response was given to the court’s query.
The court’s order expresses concern over the President’s letter and the Election Commission’s position, which led to unnecessary disputes and constitutional breaches. It reiterates that the Constitution and the law do not empower the court to set election dates, and that all institutions must operate within their constitutional boundaries.
Constitutional Compliance and Responsibility
The Supreme Court’s order emphasizes that following the Constitution is not an option but a responsibility. It cautions that any institution that interferes with the constitutional boundaries of another will face serious consequences. The court urges all parties to respect the separation of powers and refrain from unnecessary disputes, ensuring the smooth functioning of democracy.
the Supreme Court’s written order on the upcoming elections in Pakistan underscores the importance of upholding democracy, constitutional freedom, and media responsibility. By emphasizing the need for fair comment, accurate information, and constitutional compliance, the court has paved the way for free and transparent elections, essential for the country’s democratic growth and stability.
Keywords: Supreme Court, elections, democracy, constitutional freedom, freedom of expression, misinformation, media responsibility, fair comment, election timeline, constitutional requirements, census, constituency delimitation.
How does the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s decision to hold elections on February 8 impact the country’s democracy and freedom of expression?
Pakistan’s Supreme Court Orders National and Provincial Assembly Elections on February 8: Upholding Democracy and Freedom of Expression
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has issued a written order, scheduling the national and provincial assembly elections for February 8. The order highlights the importance of fair and transparent elections, while also emphasizing the need to protect democracy from misinformation and misuse of constitutional freedoms.
Misuse of Freedom of Expression: A Threat to Democracy
The Supreme Court’s written order notes that Article 19 of the Pakistani Constitution guarantees freedom of expression, but some individuals have misused this right to create false narratives and spread wrong information. This misinformation undermines democracy, reduces public participation, and decreases voter turnout, as evident from a study by the European Parliament.
The Role of Media in Upholding Democracy
The media plays a crucial role in promoting democracy, but it must do so responsibly. PEMRA, Pakistan’s electronic media regulatory authority, must ensure that constitutional violations are banned, and fair comments are made to improve democracy. The court praises journalists who carry out their duties professionally, upholding the truth and importance of the matter.
Constitutional Requirements and Delimitation of Constituencies
The Supreme Court’s order explains that the National Assembly was dissolved on August 9, and the President was bound to give a date for holding elections within ninety days. However, the seventh census had to be notified beforehand, and the Election Commission decided to delimit the constituencies based on the new census. This process was delayed due to the approval of the sixth census, which took six years.
Constitutional Responsibility and Boundaries
The Supreme Court emphasizes that following the constitution is not an option but a responsibility for all institutions. The court has no authority to set the date of the election, and the President and Election Commission should not have approached the court unnecessarily. The court’s decision upholds the constitution and ensures that each institution respects its constitutional boundaries.
Elections and Democracy
The Supreme Court’s order highlights the importance of holding elections on time, as they are essential for the functioning of democracy. The court’s decision has put an end to the uncertainty surrounding the election date, and the country can now focus on the democratic process. The order serves as a reminder that democracy is strengthened when institutions work within their constitutional boundaries and respect each other’s autonomy.
Conclusion
the Supreme Court’s written order is a significant development in Pakistan’s democratic journey. It upholds the importance of fair and transparent elections, while also emphasizing the need to protect democracy from misinformation and misuse of constitutional freedoms. The order serves as a reminder to all institutions to respect their constitutional boundaries and work towards strengthening democracy in Pakistan.
Keyword Optimization:
Pakistan Supreme Court
National and Provincial Assembly Elections
Freedom of Expression
Misinformation and Democracy
PEMRA and Media Regulation
Constitutional Requirements and Delimitation of Constituencies
Constitutional Responsibility and Boundaries
Elections and Democracy
Pakistani Constitution and Article 19
Meta Description:
Pakistan’s Supreme Court orders national and provincial assembly elections on February 8, emphasizing the importance of fair and transparent elections, while also protecting democracy from misinformation and misuse of constitutional freedoms.
Header Tags:
H1: Pakistan’s Supreme Court Orders National and Provincial Assembly Elections on February 8
H2: Misuse of Freedom of Expression: A Threat to Democracy
H2: The Role of Media in Upholding Democracy
H2: Constitutional Requirements and Delimitation of Constituencies
H2: Constitutional Responsibility and Boundaries
H2: Elections and Democracy
H2: Conclusion
