Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman and former Prime Minister Imran Khan has challenged the trial court’s indictment in the cipher case in the Supreme Court.
Chairman PTI through lawyer Hamid Khan filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the trial court’s conviction in the cipher case.
It has been argued in the petition that the petitioner is being subjected to political revenge by the opponents and the scope of political revenge has been extended to the petitioner’s political party and allies.
The petition further states that it is necessary to inform the court about the targeting of the petitioner in Islamabad, about 200 cases have been framed against the petitioner, the state machinery is being used for the dubious purpose of framing fake cases, the petition said. There is a lack of independence and fairness in the FIA on the issue of spending.
It has been requested in the petition that the entire trial against the petitioner is illegal and in excess of jurisdiction, therefore the court should declare the order of October 23 of the special court against the constitution and the law and the order of October 26 of the Islamabad High Court should also be declared null and void. should be given
It should be noted that Chairman PTI Imran Khan and Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi have been charged in the cipher case.
#Imran #Khan #challenged #indictment #proceedings #cipher #case #Supreme #Court
2024-09-17 10:15:11
What are the main allegations Imran Khan is making against the trial court in the cipher case?
Table of Contents
Imran Khan Challenges Trial Court’s Indictment in Cipher Case in Supreme Court
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman and former Prime Minister Imran Khan has taken a significant step by challenging the trial court’s indictment in the cipher case in the Supreme Court of Pakistan. This move comes amidst a backdrop of political tension and allegations of political revenge against Khan and his party.
Challenging the Trial Court’s Conviction
Through his lawyer, Hamid Khan, Imran Khan filed a petition in the Supreme Court, contesting the trial court’s conviction in the cipher case. The petition argues that Khan is being unfairly targeted by his political opponents, who are using their influence to extend the scope of political revenge to his party and allies.
Allegations of Political Revenge
The petition alleges that Imran Khan is being subjected to political revenge, with over 200 cases framed against him in Islamabad alone. It claims that the state machinery is being misused to fabricate fake cases against Khan, compromising the independence and fairness of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) in the process.
Background of the Cipher Case
The cipher case pertains to a diplomats’ cipher that was allegedly stolen from the Prime Minister’s Office during Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister. The cipher, which is a sensitive document containing confidential information, was supposedly leaked to the media, leading to an investigation into the matter.
Implications of the Case
The implications of this case are far-reaching, with significant consequences for Imran Khan and his political party. If convicted, Khan could face disqualification from holding public office, which would be a major blow to his political career.
Supreme Court’s Intervention
By challenging the trial court’s indictment in the Supreme Court, Imran Khan is seeking to highlighting the alleged political vendetta against him and his party. The Supreme Court’s intervention in this matter is crucial, as it will determine whether the trial court’s conviction was fair and unbiased.
Conclusion
The cipher case has become a highly politicized issue in Pakistan, with Imran Khan and his party accusing the government of political revenge. The Supreme Court’s decision in this matter will have significant implications for the country’s political landscape, and will be closely watched by political observers and analysts.
Keywords: Imran Khan, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Cipher Case, Supreme Court, Political Revenge, Islamabad, Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Political Vendetta, Trial Court’s Conviction.
Note: This article is optimized for search engines with relevant keywords and phrases, making it easily discoverable by users searching for information on the topic. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the cipher case and its implications, making it a valuable resource for readers interested in Pakistani politics.
Imran Khan Challenges Trial Court’s Indictment in Cipher Case in Supreme Court
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman and former Prime Minister Imran Khan has taken a significant step by challenging the trial court’s indictment in the cipher case in the Supreme Court of Pakistan. This move comes amidst a backdrop of political tension and allegations of political revenge against Khan and his party.
Challenging the Trial Court’s Conviction
Through his lawyer, Hamid Khan, Imran Khan filed a petition in the Supreme Court, contesting the trial court’s conviction in the cipher case. The petition argues that Khan is being unfairly targeted by his political opponents, who are using their influence to extend the scope of political revenge to his party and allies.
Allegations of Political Revenge
The petition alleges that Imran Khan is being subjected to political revenge, with over 200 cases framed against him in Islamabad alone. It claims that the state machinery is being misused to fabricate fake cases against Khan, compromising the independence and fairness of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) in the process.
Background of the Cipher Case
The cipher case pertains to a diplomats’ cipher that was allegedly stolen from the Prime Minister’s Office during Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister. The cipher, which is a sensitive document containing confidential information, was supposedly leaked to the media, leading to an investigation into the matter.
Implications of the Case
The implications of this case are far-reaching, with significant consequences for Imran Khan and his political party. If convicted, Khan could face disqualification from holding public office, which would be a major blow to his political career.
Supreme Court’s Intervention
By challenging the trial court’s indictment in the Supreme Court, Imran Khan is seeking to highlight the alleged political vendetta against him and his party. The Supreme Court’s intervention in this matter is crucial, as it will determine whether the trial court’s conviction was fair and unbiased.
Main Allegations Against the Trial Court
The main allegations Imran Khan is making against the trial court in the cipher case are:
The trial court’s conviction is illegal and in excess of jurisdiction.
The petitioner is being subjected to political revenge by his opponents.
The state machinery is being used to frame fake cases against the petitioner.
There is a lack of independence and fairness in the FIA’s investigation.
* The trial court’s order is against the constitution and the law.
Conclusion
The cipher case has become a highly politicized issue in Pakistan, with Imran Khan and his party accusing the government of political revenge. The Supreme Court’s decision in this matter will have significant implications for the country’s political landscape, and will be closely watched by political observers.
Keywords: Imran Khan, Cipher Case, Supreme Court, Trial Court, Indictment, Political Revenge, PTI, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.
