Unraveling Secrets: The High-Stakes Interrogation of Interior Minister Francisco Jiménez

Unraveling Secrets: The High-Stakes Interrogation of Interior Minister Francisco Jiménez

The day that began with the commemoration of the 203 years of independence ended with a tense plenary session due to the questions from the deputy Sandra Jovel to the Minister of the Interior, Francisco Jiménez, as part of the interpellation to which he is subjected in Congress for the incidence of crime in the country.

This Thursday the round of 20 basic questions ended, but then the space was opened for follow-up questions, and despite the fact that there was a previous list, Jovel reserved the right to speak and continued asking more questions.

This phase became tense due to the type of questions raised by Jovel related to the Masagua prison, Escuintla, clandestine runways, insurance purchases, among other topics, which led Jiménez to repeatedly ask him to reconsider them because he considered that they were unclear and contained assessments or assumptions.

“This is not a thesis exam or a law exam for you to ask me a question of that type,” Jiménez replied after Jovel asked him if he knew Article 54 of the State Contracting Law, referring to doubts about the amendments regarding the deadlines for the construction of the Masagua prison, Escuintla, among other things.

Meanwhile, the opposition demanded that the Board of Directors call the head of the Interior portfolio to order so that he could respond.

“There is no matter within the scope of a ministry that the deputies cannot investigate, through interpellation, the law says so, for the love of God, read, read! (…) the interpellant (Jovel) is requesting it, that the other (Jiménez) does not want to give the answers is something he is obliged to do and if he does not know how to answer, he should resign,” said deputy Héctor Aldana, from the Vamos block.

In turn, the pro-government deputies argued for Jovel to stick to the specific issues of the interpellation.

“We have heard questions that are of an administrative nature and these questions have nothing to do with the request that was originally made,” claimed the independent deputy of the Semilla Movement, Andrea Reyes.

The Board of Directors agreed with him and the first vice president of the Congress, Darwin Lucas, asked Jovel to rephrase his questions.

After several questions, the quorum was broken and the session was adjourned, so the interpellation will resume next Thursday with a series of new questions. Meanwhile, four more ministers are awaiting their turn for impeachment in Congress.

window.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’, function() {
/*(function($) {*/
(function (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = document.location.protocol + “//connect.facebook.net/es_LA/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
/*})(jQuery);*/
});

#tense #questions #marks #questioning #Minister #Interior #Francisco #Jiménez

– ​What were ‌the ⁢main⁤ issues discussed during Sandra Jovel’s ‍interpellation of Minister Francisco Jiménez ⁢in Congress?

Tense Moments ​in⁣ Congress:⁢ Sandra Jovel’s Interpellation of Minister Francisco Jiménez

Commemorating 203‍ Years ​of ⁤Independence with a Tense Plenary Session

On a day that began with the celebration of 203 years of independence, the plenary session of Congress in Guatemala took an​ unexpected turn, filled with tension and controversy. The focus of ‌attention ‍was the interpellation of Minister of the Interior, Francisco Jiménez, led by Deputy Sandra Jovel, revolving‌ around the pressing issue of crime in the⁢ country.

The Interpellation’s Twists and Turns

The session began with​ a round of 20 basic⁣ questions, which eventually led to a series of​ follow-up⁢ questions. However, the atmosphere shifted ⁢when Deputy Jovel reserved the right to continue⁣ asking questions, sparking ⁢a heated⁢ exchange with‍ Minister Jiménez. The tension arose from the type ‌of questions‌ Jovel posed, focusing on sensitive topics such⁢ as the Masagua prison in Escuintla, clandestine runways, and insurance purchases.

Clash of Opinions: Unclear Questions and Assumptions

Minister Jiménez repeatedly requested that Deputy Jovel ‌reconsider her questions, citing‍ their lack of clarity ⁢and perceived assumptions. At one‍ point, ​he even likened the questioning to a “thesis exam or a ​law exam,” emphasizing that the minister’s role⁣ is ‌not to respond to hypothetical scenarios.

Opposition Demands Answers, Pro-Government Deputies Seek‍ Focus

As the debate intensified, opposition deputies demanded that the Board of Directors⁣ intervene, urging Minister Jiménez to provide clear and concise answers. Deputy Héctor Aldana, ⁢from‌ the ‍Vamos block, passionately argued that the law empowers‌ deputies to investigate any matter ‌within a ​ministry’s scope,⁣ emphasizing‌ the ​importance of ‌accountability.

On the other hand, pro-government deputies, such as⁢ Andrea Reyes, advocated ‍for sticking to the original purpose of‍ the interpellation, claiming that some questions ⁤strayed from‌ the core⁢ issue of crime.

Adjournment and Next Steps

The ⁣quorum was eventually broken, leading to the ‍adjournment of the session. The interpellation will‌ resume next Thursday, with a new set of ‍questions⁢ prepared by Deputy Jovel. Meanwhile, ⁢four more ministers are expected ‌to face similar questioning ‌in ​the coming weeks.

The Broader Context: Crime and Accountability in Guatemala

This tense⁤ exchange ‌in Congress reflects​ the country’s deep-seated concerns about crime⁢ and insecurity. ⁢As Guatemala continues to grapple with⁤ these challenges, the interpellation ⁢of Minister ‍Jiménez serves as a crucial ⁣step towards greater transparency and accountability.

Key Takeaways

The interpellation of ​Minister of the Interior, Francisco Jiménez, was marked by tension ​and controversy, centered around crime and insecurity in Guatemala.

Deputy Sandra Jovel’s⁣ follow-up‌ questions sparked a heated exchange,⁢ with Minister Jiménez questioning their ‍clarity ‍and assumptions.

‍Opposition deputies demanded clear ​answers,‌ while pro-government deputies sought to refocus ​the discussion on the original purpose of the interpellation.

The ⁢session was adjourned, with the interpellation set to ⁢resume next Thursday.

This article is optimized ​for search engines with relevant keywords, including ⁣”interpellation,” “Guatemala,” “crime,” “insecurity,” and “accountability.”

– What were the main issues raised by Deputy Sandra Jovel during the plenary session with Minister Francisco Jiménez?

Tense Plenary Session in Congress: Minister of Interior Faces Questions on Crime Incidence

On a day commemorating 203 years of independence, a tense plenary session unfolded in Congress as Deputy Sandra Jovel grilled Minister of the Interior, Francisco Jiménez, with a series of questions on the incidence of crime in the country. The heated exchange marked the culmination of the 20 basic questions phase, with Jovel reserving the right to ask follow-up questions that sparked controversy.

The interpellation session began with Jovel posing questions related to the Masagua prison in Escuintla, clandestine runways, insurance purchases, and other topics, which Minister Jiménez deemed unclear and containing assumptions. The minister repeatedly asked Jovel to reconsider her questions, sparking a tense exchange.

“This is not a thesis exam or a law exam for you to ask me a question of that type,” Jiménez replied after Jovel asked him about Article 54 of the State Contracting Law, related to doubts about amendments regarding the deadlines for the construction of the Masagua prison.

The opposition called for the Board of Directors to intervene, demanding that Minister Jiménez respond to the questions. “There is no matter within the scope of a ministry that the deputies cannot investigate, through interpellation, the law says so,” argued Deputy Héctor Aldana from the Vamos block.

In contrast, pro-government deputies urged Jovel to stick to the specific issues of the interpellation, with independent deputy of the Semilla Movement, Andrea Reyes, stating that the questions had nothing to do with the original request.

The Board of Directors ultimately agreed with the pro-government deputies, and the first vice president of Congress, Darwin Lucas, asked Jovel to rephrase her questions. However, the quorum was soon broken, and the session was adjourned, with the interpellation set to resume next Thursday.

The incident highlights the ongoing debate on crime incidence in Guatemala, with four more ministers awaiting their turn for impeachment in Congress. The country has faced numerous challenges in recent years, including a devastating earthquake of 6.2 magnitude that affected tens of thousands and resulted in three fatalities.

In another development, military authorities located a plane without authorization in the Apure forest, raising concerns about clandestine activities. The government’s response to these incidents will be closely monitored in the coming weeks, as the people of Guatemala demand greater transparency and accountability from their leaders.

Key Takeaways

Minister of the Interior, Francisco Jiménez, faced a tense plenary session in Congress over the incidence of crime in Guatemala.

Deputy Sandra Jovel posed follow-up questions related to the Masagua prison, clandestine runways, and insurance purchases, sparking controversy.

The opposition demanded that the Board of Directors intervene, while pro-government deputies urged Jovel to stick to the original issues.

The interpellation session was adjourned and will resume next Thursday.

* Four more ministers are awaiting their turn for impeachment in Congress, amid ongoing debates on crime incidence and government accountability.

Leave a Replay