During the hearing of the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand dams funds case in the Supreme Court, the federal government requested the amount of dams funds from the Supreme Court, while the court issued a notice to the Auditor General of Pakistan on the issue of giving the money to the federal government, while former Attorney Generals Khalid Javed and Anwar Mansoor were also summoned for the next hearing.
A 4-member bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faiz Isa, heard the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams Funds case.
Additional Attorney General Aamir Rehman said that we have filed a miscellaneous application, the money of dams funds should be given to the Federation and WAPDA, the account was opened by the State Bank under the supervision of the Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan inquired how much money is in dams funds, to which WAPDA’s lawyer Saad Rasool said that there are about 20 billion rupees in dams funds.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa asked how this case started. To which WAPDA’s counsel replied that the Supreme Court had taken suo motu notice in 2018 during the cases pending under WAPDA, the Dams Funds Implementation Bench of the Supreme Court held 17 hearings.
The Chief Justice said that WAPDA will have many other projects, does the Supreme Court monitor every project of WAPDA? On which the WAPDA lawyer said that there were disputes between the private parties on the issue of construction of dams, the Supreme Court appointed the disputes of the private parties to be heard by them instead of the relevant courts. Should be played on the forums.
The court adjourned the hearing while calling for the relevant records of the case.
After the break, the hearing of the case resumed, the Supreme Court issued a notice to the Auditor General of Pakistan on the issue of giving the money to the federal government.
The Supreme Court ordered that the Auditor General of Pakistan himself or an authorized officer should appear at the next hearing and support should be given regarding giving the amount of dams fund to the federation.
The Supreme Court also issued notices to 2 former attorney generals and judicial assistants, Khalid Javed and Anwar Mansoor were summoned for the next hearing, while the court also summoned the judicial assistant Makhdoom Ali Khan for the next hearing.
The Supreme Court said that the court should be assisted in the construction and execution of the dams.
The Supreme Court adjourned the hearing for 3 weeks while issuing notices to other parties of the case.
It should be noted that in July 2018, the then Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Saqib Nisar, taking notice of the water shortage across the country, announced the establishment of dam funds for the construction of various dams. And also created a bank account named Prime Minister Dam Fund, in which donations were deposited by Pakistanis from all over the world including Pakistan. He had also expressed his desire to build dams under his supervision after retirement.
#Federal #government #seeks #dams #funds #Supreme #Court #Pakistan
2024-09-13 01:14:41
Table of Contents
- 1 Based on the context of the “Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams Funds Case: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Hearing,” here are some potential PAA (Public Administration Accountability) related questions:
- 2 What are the key factors contributing to the controversies surrounding the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams funds case as discussed in the Supreme Court’s recent hearing?
Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams Funds Case: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Hearing
The Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand dams funds case has been a subject of great interest and controversy in Pakistan. Recently, the Supreme Court of Pakistan heard the case, and some significant developments took place. In this article, we will delve into the details of the case and the recent hearing, exploring the implications of the court’s decisions.
Background of the Case
The Diamer Bhasha Dam is a crucial hydroelectric project in Pakistan, designed to generate electricity and provide water storage for irrigation and drinking water purposes. The project has been plagued by controversies, including disagreements over royalty rates and land acquisition issues [[2]]. In 2018, the Supreme Court took suo motu notice of the case, and since then, the court has been hearing the case and issuing notices to relevant parties.
Recent Hearing: Key Developments
In the recent hearing, a 4-member bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faiz Isa, heard the case. The federal government requested that the court release the dam funds to the federation and WAPDA (Water and Power Development Authority). The court, in response, issued a notice to the Auditor General of Pakistan, asking him to appear at the next hearing and provide support for giving the dam funds to the federation. Additionally, the court summoned two former attorney generals, Khalid Javed and Anwar Mansoor, as well as judicial assistant Makhdoom Ali Khan, to appear at the next hearing.
The Controversy Surrounding Dam Funds
The dam funds have been a subject of controversy, with allegations of mismanagement and corruption. In 2022, it was reported that Rs 9 billion (approximately $40 million) was raised for the construction of the dam, but Rs 14 billion (approximately $63 million) was spent on advertising it [[3]]. This has raised serious concerns about the transparency and accountability of the dam fund management.
The Role of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court’s involvement in the case highlights the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring that public projects are executed transparently and in the best interests of the people. The court’s decision to monitor the construction and execution of the dams is a positive step towards ensuring that the projects are completed efficiently and without corruption.
Conclusion
The Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand dams funds case is a critical test of the Supreme Court’s ability to ensure accountability and transparency in public projects. The recent hearing has shed light on the complexities of the case, and the court’s decisions will have significant implications for the future of the project. As the case continues to unfold, it is essential to monitor the developments closely and ensure that the court’s decisions are in the best interests of the people of Pakistan.
References:
<a href="https://sacgb.gov.pk/Judgments/SMC.10-200920160420120537996.PDF”>[1]
<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339994448Socioeconomicconflictsandland-useissuesincontextofinfrastructuralprojectsTheexampleofDiamerBashaDamprojectin_Pakistan”>[2]
What are the key factors contributing to the controversies surrounding the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams funds case as discussed in the Supreme Court’s recent hearing?
Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams Funds Case: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Hearing
The Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand dams funds case has been a subject of great interest and controversy in Pakistan. Recently, the Supreme Court of Pakistan heard the case, and some significant developments took place. In this article, we will delve into the details of the case and the recent hearing, exploring the implications of the court’s decisions.
Background of the Case
The Diamer Bhasha Dam is a crucial hydroelectric project in Pakistan, designed to generate electricity and provide water storage for irrigation and drinking water purposes. The project has been plagued by controversies, including disagreements over royalty rates and land acquisition issues [[2]]. In 2018, the Supreme Court took suo motu notice of the case, and since then, the court has been hearing the case and issuing notices to relevant parties.
**Recent
