Islamabad High Court Former Prime Minister and founding chairman of <a href="https://www.archyde.com/imran-khan-with-jail-filling-campaign-pakistan-imrankhan-arrest-politics/" title="Imran Khan with jail filling campaign | | Pakistan | imrankhan | Arrest politics”>Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf Imran Khan of the trial of Military court I have on Thursday sought an explanation from the federal government by September 16 in a petition against possible trial and detention.
The court remarked that the minister threatened Imran Khan with a military trial. Imran Khan is a civilian and the military trial of a civilian is a matter of concern for the petitioner and the court.
Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb heard Imran Khan’s plea on Thursday and asked Assistant Attorney General Azmat Bashir to take instructions from the Attorney General’s Office.
Imran Khan’s lawyer Uzair Bhandari told the court that there is no case against Imran Khan in the military court but there may be in the near future.
Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb inquired that ‘You are saying that there is no case, but there may be more?’ To which Imran Khan’s lawyer replied that ‘we are worried.’
Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb remarked that ‘this is politics.’
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
The lawyer said that a statement has been issued by DG ISPR on this issue. Statements have also been made by senior government and military officials.’
To which Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb replied: ‘That too is politics.’
The honorable judge further said that the petitioner’s counsel says that a statement has come from DG ISPR. If so, there should be a clear stand from the Federation. Let us say today that there is nothing yet, tomorrow they will bring the order of your military trial, then what will happen?’
Along with this, he gave instructions to the Additional Attorney General to ‘take instructions from the federal government and inform the court clearly on Monday.’
The Additional Attorney General said on this occasion that ‘I request that the objections raised on the application be decided first.’
On which Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb said that ‘I am removing the objections of the Registrar’s Office on the application, there is a decision of the Supreme Court regarding the trial of civilians in military courts. is If nothing like this happens, the application will become ineffective, if something like this is considered, then we will hear the case and decide.’
When did Imran Khan submit the application?
Pakistan Army Public Relations (ISPR) chief Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry on September 5 Press briefing After PTI founder Imran Khan approached the Islamabad High Court.
In response to a question during the press briefing, DG ISPR said that ‘if anyone else is involved in the inquiry against former DGISI General Faiz Hameed, action may be taken against him as well.’
In view of this statement, Imran Khan, who was the Prime Minister at that time, filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court through lawyer Uzair Karamat Bhandari, in which the Secretary Law, Secretary Interior, Federation, IG Islamabad, IG Punjab, D. GFIA and IG Jails have been made parties.
The petition has requested that ‘Imran Khan be stopped from being handed over to military custody and ensure that the PTI founder remains in civilian courts and under civilian custody.’
In July this year, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf also protested against the possible handing over of its founding chairman Imran Khan to the custody of the army for trial. Application filed in Lahore High Court Who was
In the petition filed in the Lahore High Court by Imran Khan’s lawyer Aziz Karamat, it was stated that Imran Khan is feared to be handed over to the army for trial in the May 9, 2023 cases.
The position was taken in the petition that the civil courts in the country are working according to the constitution and law, so the trial of Imran Khan should be ordered to continue in the civil courts instead of the military courts.
After the arrest of Imran Khan in an alleged corruption case by NAB on May 9 last year, during violent protests across the country, incidents of attacks on military installations and vandalism and arson of private and national properties came to light.
The government had decided to file a case against these persons in military courts under the Pakistan Army Act and the Official Secrets Act.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2494823637234887’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#military #trial #Imran #Khan #Islamabad #High #Court #seeks #clarification #government
2024-09-12 14:52:13
What are the implications of the Islamabad High Court’s request for clarification from the federal government regarding Imran Khan’s potential military trial?
Table of Contents
- 1 What are the implications of the Islamabad High Court’s request for clarification from the federal government regarding Imran Khan’s potential military trial?
- 2 Here are some potential People Also Ask (PAA) questions related to the title “Islamabad High Court: A Beacon of Hope for Imran Khan in Military Trial Threat”:
Imran Khan’s Possible Military Trial: Islamabad High Court Seeks Explanation from Federal Government
In a recent development, the Islamabad High Court has sought an explanation from the federal government regarding the possible military trial of former Prime Minister and founding chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf, Imran Khan [[2]]. The court has asked the government to provide a clear stance on the matter by September 16.
The petition was filed by Imran Khan’s lawyer, Uzair Karamat Bhandari, after the Director-General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, hinted at the possibility of a military trial during a press briefing on September 5 [[3]]. The ISPR chief stated that action may be taken against anyone involved in the inquiry against former DGISI General Faiz Hameed.
Imran Khan’s lawyer argued that there is no case against him in the military court currently, but there may be one in the near future. The court expressed concern over the possibility of a military trial, citing the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the trial of civilians in military courts [[3]].
Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb remarked that the minister’s threat of a military trial is a matter of concern for the petitioner and the court, as Imran Khan is a civilian. The judge also stated that the statements made by senior government and military officials are political in nature [[3]].
The Islamabad High Court has also removed the objections raised on the application and has instructed the Additional Attorney General to take instructions from the federal government and inform the court clearly on Monday.
This is not the first time Imran Khan has approached the court regarding a possible military trial. In July, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf filed an application in the Lahore High Court, stating that Imran Khan fears being handed over to the army for trial in the May 9, 2023 cases [[1]].
The government had decided to file cases against individuals involved in attacks on military installations and vandalism during violent protests following Imran Khan’s arrest in an alleged corruption case by NAB on May 9 last year.
The development has raised concerns over the possibility of a military trial for a civilian, and the Islamabad High Court’s decision will be closely watched. The court’s directive to the federal government to provide a clear stance on the matter by September 16 has added to the uncertainty surrounding Imran Khan’s possible trial.
As the drama unfolds, one thing is certain – the Islamabad High Court’s decision will have far-reaching implications for Imran Khan and the country’s political landscape.
References:
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YarF1lsM74
[2] https://time.com/6693147/pakistan-election-results-imran-k
Here are some potential People Also Ask (PAA) questions related to the title “Islamabad High Court: A Beacon of Hope for Imran Khan in Military Trial Threat”:
Islamabad High Court: A Beacon of Hope for Imran Khan in Military Trial Threat
The Islamabad High Court has taken a significant step in ensuring the protection of civilian rights, particularly in the case of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. The court’s decision to seek an explanation from the federal government by September 16 regarding the possible trial and detention of Imran Khan in a military court is a crucial development in this high-stakes drama.
The Threat of Military Trial
The controversy began when DG ISPR, Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, made a statement on September 5, implying that Imran Khan could face a military trial if found involved in the inquiry against former DGISI General Faiz Hameed. This statement sparked concerns about the potential misuse of military courts to try civilians, a practice that has been widely criticized by human rights organizations.
Imran Khan’s Plea
In response to the DG ISPR’s statement, Imran Khan’s lawyer, Uzair Bhandari, filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court, seeking protection from possible detention and trial in a military court. The petition named the Secretary Law, Secretary Interior, Federation, IG Islamabad, IG Punjab, D. GFIA, and IG Jails as parties.
The Court’s Verdict
Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb heard Imran Khan’s plea and asked Assistant Attorney General Azmat Bashir to take instructions from the Attorney General’s Office. The court expressed concern over the potential abuse of military courts, stating that the trial of a civilian in such a court is a matter of concern for both the petitioner and the court.
A Warning to the Government
The Islamabad High Court’s decision to seek an explanation from the federal government is a clear warning that the court will not tolerate any attempt to misuse military courts to try civilians. Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb’s remarks, “If so, there should be a clear stand from the Federation. Let us say today that there is nothing yet, tomorrow they will bring the order of your military trial, then what will happen?” underscore the court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting civilian rights.
Recent Developments
In a recent development, a Pakistani court has acquitted Imran Khan and his wife in a case related to illegal marriage [[1]] [[2]] [[3]]. Although this acquittal is unrelated to the military trial threat, it demonstrates the complexities of Imran Khan’s legal battles and the importance of the Islamabad High Court’s decision in ensuring his protection from potential military trial.
Conclusion
The Islamabad High Court’s decision is a significant milestone in the ongoing saga of Imran Khan’s legal struggles. By seeking an explanation from the federal government, the court has sent a strong message that it will not tolerate any abuse of power or misuse of military courts to try civilians. As the proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the court’s demands and whether Imran Khan will ultimately be protected from the threat of military trial.