The Supreme Court has issued a written order for the November 15 court proceedings in the Faizabad dharna review case. The ruling said that review petitions were filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, which were not scheduled for hearing, due to which the court decision was not implemented.
The decree said that the Supreme Court had given its decision on the Faizabad sit-in case on February 6, 2019, in which a warning had been given for the future by referring to the violent incidents of the past, but despite the passage of almost five years, the governments had not decided on the Faizabad sit-in. Not implemented.
The ruling said that review petitions were filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, which were not scheduled for hearing, due to which the court decision was not implemented.
The Supreme Court in the order said that in the wake of the Faizabad dharna verdict, no one was held responsible nor held accountable for the violent protests, as a result of which the nation had to witness the events of May 9.
The Supreme Court said in the order that Sheikh Rashid’s lawyer said that he wants to withdraw the revision application, the court repeatedly asked why he filed the application, Sheikh Rashid’s lawyer replied that he filed the revision due to a misunderstanding.
The order said that it is surprising that a politician who had been a member of Parliament for a long time and held a high position like a federal minister was misunderstood, due to which the review petition was filed. Filed at someone’s behest, reply repeated Revision petition filed on the basis of misconception.
A new revelation came out in the court order according to which the petitions were removed from the cause list on April 25, 2019 on the instructions of former Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa.
The order said that when the revision petitions were not scheduled for hearing, the relevant judicial authorities were asked, the Additional Registrar Factor and the Additional Registrar Judicial gave their reports, according to which, on April 25, 2019, the revision petitions were filed in the draft of the final cause list at one o’clock on the day. At twelve minutes, just five hours later on the same day, on the instructions of the then Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, these applications were removed from the final cause list at five past six in the evening.
#passage #years #governments #implement #Faizabad #sitin #verdict #Supreme #Court
2024-09-11 00:20:30
Faizabad Dharna case judgement pdf
Table of Contents
The Faizabad Dharna Review Case: A Tale of Delays and Unimplemented Decisions
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has recently issued a written order for the November 15 court proceedings in the Faizabad dharna review case, shedding light on the ongoing delays and lack of implementation of the court’s decision in the Faizabad sit-in case. The ruling highlights the review petitions filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, which were not scheduled for hearing, resulting in the court decision not being implemented.
The Background
The Faizabad sit-in case dates back to February 6, 2019, when the Supreme Court gave its decision in the case. The court warned against future violent incidents, referencing the past violent protests, but despite the passage of almost five years, the governments have failed to implement the decision [[1]].
Review Petitions and Delays
Review petitions were filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, but they were not scheduled for hearing, resulting in the court decision not being implemented. The Supreme Court expressed surprise that despite the filing of review petitions, no one was held responsible or accountable for the violent protests, which led to the events of May 9 [[2]]. Moreover, it was revealed that the petitions were removed from the cause list on April 25, 2019, on the instructions of former Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa [[3]].
The Withdrawal of Review Petitions
In a recent development, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) formally requested the Supreme Court to withdraw the review petition in the Faizabad dharna case [[3]]. The IB’s withdrawal of the review petition has raised questions about the motives behind the filing of the petition in the first place.
Sheikh Rashid’s Misunderstanding
Sheikh Rashid’s lawyer claimed that he wanted to withdraw the revision application, citing a misunderstanding as the reason for filing the review petition. The court repeatedly asked why the application was filed, and the lawyer replied that it was filed due to a misconception. The court expressed surprise that a seasoned politician like Sheikh Rashid, who had been a member of Parliament for a long time and held a high position like a federal minister, could be so misunderstood [[2]].
The Way Forward
The Faizabad dharna review case highlights the need for accountability and implementation of court decisions in Pakistan. The delays and lack of implementation of the court’s decision have led to further violence and instability in the country. It is crucial that the governments take concrete steps to implement the court’s decision and hold those responsible for the violent protests accountable.
the Faizabad dharna review case is a testament to the ongoing struggles of Pakistan’s justice system. The delays and lack of implementation of court decisions have far-reaching consequences, and it is essential that the government and judiciary work together to ensure that justice is served.
Faizabad Dharna case judgement pdf
The Faizabad Dharna Review Case: A Tale of Delays and Unimplemented Decisions
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has recently issued a written order for the November 15 court proceedings in the Faizabad dharna review case, shedding light on the ongoing delays and lack of implementation of the court’s decision in the Faizabad sit-in case. The ruling highlights the review petitions filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, which were not scheduled for hearing, resulting in the court decision not being implemented.
The Background
The Faizabad sit-in case dates back to February 6, 2019, when the Supreme Court gave its decision in the case. The court warned against future violent incidents, referencing the past violent protests, but despite the passage of almost five years, the governments have failed to implement the decision [[1]]. The sit-in was organized by Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) and started on November 8, 2017, at the Faizabad Interchange [[3]].
Review Petitions and Delays
Review petitions were filed against the Faizabad sit-in decision, but they were not scheduled for hearing, resulting in the court decision not being implemented. The Supreme Court expressed surprise that despite the filing of review petitions, no one was held responsible or accountable for the violent protests, which led to the events of May 9 [[2]]. Moreover, it was revealed that the petitions were removed from the cause list on April 25, 2019, on the instructions of former Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa [[3]].
The Withdrawal of Review Petitions
In a recent development, the Intelligence Bureau (IB) formally requested the Supreme Court to withdraw the review petition in the Faizabad dharna case [[3]]. The IB’s withdrawal of the review petition has raised questions about the motives behind the filing of the petition in the first place.
Sheikh Rashid’s Misunderstanding
Sheikh Rashid’s lawyer claimed that he wanted to withdraw the revision application, citing a misunderstanding as the reason for filing the review petition. The court repeatedly asked why the application was filed, and the lawyer replied that it was filed due to a misconception. The court expressed surprise that a seasoned politician like Sheikh Rashid, who had been a member of Parliament for a long time and held a high position like a federal minister, could be so misunderstood [[2]].
