The conflict between the judge examining the case, Zina Vilnienė, and the accused arose after this judge announced that the state attorney Mykolas Girdiušas was appointed to AGAstrauskaitei. After hearing this, the accused stated that she would defend herself.
“Accused, please don’t jump out of your seat,” the panel member presiding over today’s hearing tried to discipline the accused.
Produced by Cellophanas and A. Lobov
Table of Contents
- 1 Produced by Cellophanas and A. Lobov
- 2 The accused did not return – the defender also wanted to leave
- 3 What were the key events that led to the chaos in the courtroom during the Seimas riots case?
- 4 Here are some PAA (People Also Ask) related questions for the title: **The Seimas Riots Case: Chaos in the Courtroom and Abroad**:
Table of Contents
“Today you are all very angry, I feel like I’m in prison, even though I haven’t been there. You are appointing a stranger, I feel like I have been called by a Gestapo supervisor, I am going to take medicine”, – AGAstrauskaitė was even more enraged by the court’s remarks.
After swearing, judge Z. Vilnienė ordered the accused to leave the courtroom and asked the police to escort her out. The defendants Antanas Kandrots and Andrejus Lobov took on the role of officers. The two grabbed the woman by the arms and led her out of the court conference room. Two policemen left the hall after this trio. The voice and moans of the accused from the corridor were clearly heard throughout the hall for some time.
In addition, it turned out that two defendants in the Seimas riots case went abroad arbitrarily, although they were given a written promise not to leave.
The defendants Mindaugas Vasiliauskas and Augustina Mieldažienė participate in the hearing remotely.
A. Mieldažienė admitted that she was in Spain, the woman said that she got a job and went on a business trip.
“Are you aware that you have been given a preventive measure, that is, a written promise not to leave your place of permanent residence?”
Did you get permission to leave? Who allowed you to leave in violation of the pretrial order? Your pretrial detention may be changed to a stricter one,” said judge Z.Vilnienė sternly.
M. Vasiliauskas also admitted that he had gone abroad, he participated in the hearing remotely from Germany, he was also warned that his pretrial detention could be changed to a stricter one.
A. Mieldažienei and M. Vasiliauskas now have a written promise not to leave, according to the current procedure, they had to apply to the court for permission to leave the country.
More than 20 defendants did not attend the hearing on Wednesday.
Judge Z. Vilnienė also announced that lawyer Valerijas Kirpičnikovs was fined 300 euros for not appearing at the October 11 hearing without a justifiable reason. Another 11 defendants were fined the same amount.
Charges have been brought against 87 persons in the case of the riots near the Seimas, as usual, not all of them come to the hearings. Almost all the accused are at large.
The accused did not return – the defender also wanted to leave
The lawyer assigned by the state to Astra Genovaita Astrauskaitei, the defendant in the case of the riots near the Seimas, must attend the hearing, the court decided and announced on Wednesday afternoon.
In the afternoon, when the hearing continued, AGAstrauskaitė did not appear in court.
M.Girdiušas, the lawyer appointed by the state, asked the court to allow him not to participate further in the case.
If the client does not trust me, please excuse me from further participation. I can’t see my client in the hall.
“The request is related to the defense of Astrauskaitė. If the client does not trust her, she has expressed an opinion towards me. Please excuse me from further participation. I don’t see my client in the courtroom, the court can remove me for one session, not for the entire process,” said the lawyer.
At that time, prosecutor Remigijus Matevičius said that, in his opinion, the lawyer appointed by the state must participate in the court session, and the accused can hire the defender she wants herself.
“He needs to be in the courtroom,” the prosecutor said.
The panel of three judges rejected the request of lawyer M. Girdiuš.
“Since the accused is not present at the hearing, we cannot hear her opinion. In this case, the presence of a defense attorney is necessary in the absence of the accused at the hearing. Astrauskaitė was removed due to a violation of the procedure of the meeting, she said that she was also leaving for health reasons, so the court has no way to ensure her participation,” said judge Z.Vilnienė.
window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
FB.init({
appId: ‘117218911630016’,
version: ‘v2.10’,
status: true,
cookie: false,
xfbml: true
});
};
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {
return;
}
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = “https://connect.facebook.net/lt_LT/sdk.js”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
#Astra #Genovaitė #Astrauskaitė #defendant #case #riots #Seimas #removed #meeting #hall
2024-09-10 16:36:24
What were the key events that led to the chaos in the courtroom during the Seimas riots case?
Seimas Riots Case: Chaos in the Courtroom and Defendants’ Breach of Trust
The Seimas riots case has taken a dramatic turn with chaos erupting in the courtroom and defendants breaching their trust by leaving the country without permission. The case, which involves 87 defendants accused of participating in riots near the Seimas (Lithuanian parliament), has seen its fair share of drama and controversy.
Conflict between Judge and Accused
The latest incident began when Judge Zina Vilnienė announced that state attorney Mykolas Girdiušas had been appointed to defend Astra Genovaita Astrauskaitei, one of the defendants. Astrauskaitei was enraged by the decision and stated that she would defend herself. The tension escalated, with the judge eventually ordering Astrauskaitei to leave the courtroom and asking the police to escort her out.
Defendants’ Breach of Trust
In another shocking turn of events, it was revealed that two defendants, Mindaugas Vasiliauskas and Augustina Mieldažienė, had left the country without permission, despite being given a written promise not to leave. Vasiliauskas participated in the hearing remotely from Germany, while Mieldažienė admitted that she was in Spain for a business trip. Both defendants were warned that their pretrial detention could be changed to a stricter one.
Lawyer’s Request to Withdraw
Lawyer Mykolas Girdiušas, appointed by the state to defend Astrauskaitei, asked the court to allow him to withdraw from the case, citing the defendant’s lack of trust in him. However, the prosecutor, Remigijus Matevičius, opposed the request, stating that the lawyer must participate in the court session. The panel of three judges ultimately rejected the lawyer’s request.
Background of the Case
The Seimas riots case is a high-profile case in Lithuania, with 87 persons accused of participating in riots near the Seimas in 2022 [[2]]. The case has seen its fair share of controversy, with some defendants failing to attend hearings and others breaching their trust by leaving the country without permission.
Prosecution’s Efforts
Prosecutors have been working to bring the perpetrators of the riots to justice, with charges brought against all 87 defendants [[1]]. However, the case has been marred by the defendants’ lack of cooperation and breaches of trust.
Protecting Persons from Domestic Violence
It is worth noting that Lithuania has laws in place to protect persons from domestic violence [[3]]. However, the Seimas riots case highlights the need for stronger measures to prevent and prosecute violent crimes.
the Seimas riots case has been marked by chaos and controversy, with defendants breaching their trust and failing to cooperate with the authorities. The prosecution’s efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice have been hindered by the defendants’ lack of cooperation, and the case serves as a stark reminder of the need for stronger measures to prevent and prosecute violent crimes.
The Seimas Riots Case: Chaos in the Courtroom and Abroad
The Seimas riots case, which began in August 2021, has been marked by controversy and unrest in the courtroom. The latest developments have seen the accused clash with the judge, lawyers requesting to be excused from the case, and defendants violating their promises not to leave the country.
What Were the Key Events That Led to the Chaos in the Courtroom During the Seimas Riots Case?
The conflict between Judge Zina Vilnienė and the accused, Astra Genovaita Astrauskaitei, began when the judge announced that state attorney Mykolas Girdiušas was appointed to Astrauskaitei. The accused responded by stating that she would defend herself, leading to a heated exchange in the courtroom. The situation escalated when Astrauskaitei swore at the court, prompting Judge Vilnienė to order her to leave the courtroom and be escorted out by police.
The Accused Did Not Return – The Defender Also Wanted to Leave
In a surprising turn of events, Astrauskaitei did not return to the courtroom after being escorted out. Her assigned lawyer, M. Girdiušas, requested to be excused from further participation in the case, citing that his client did not trust him.
Defendants Violate Promises Not to Leave the Country
Meanwhile, two defendants, Mindaugas Vasiliauskas and Augustina Mieldažienė, participated in the hearing remotely, admitting that they had left the country despite being given written promises not to leave. Vasiliauskas was in Germany, while Mieldažienė was in Spain, claiming to be on a business trip. Both were warned that their pretrial detention could be changed to a stricter one.
Prosecutors Send Seimas Riot Case to Court
In January 2023, prosecutors sent the Seimas riot case to court, marking a significant milestone in the investigation [[3]]. The case has seen charges brought against 87 persons, with many of the accused failing to attend hearings. Almost all of the accused are at large, with only a few being detained.
Parliament Speaker Opposes Riot Probe
In a related development, the opposition has initiated a riot probe, which has been met with opposition from the Parliament Speaker [[1]]. The debate surrounding the riots outside the Seimas in August 2021 continues to simmer, with criminal liability for rioting still a topic of discussion [[2]].
the Seimas riots case has been marked by chaos and controversy, with the latest developments highlighting the need for a thorough and efficient investigation. As the case continues to unfold, one can only hope for a resolution that brings justice to all parties involved.
References:
[1] Parliament Speaker Opposes Riot Probe
<a href="https://cris.mruni.eu/cris/bitstreams/76d03809-35e7-4219-8e14-c36eb6e900df