THE Supreme Court (MA) is considered very appropriate not to accept the judicial review or PK filed by the convict in the mining business permit (IUP) corruption case, Mardani H Maming, apart from the weak novum reason. The decision of the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court (MA) to reject the judicial review (PK) of Mardani H Maming is absolute and cannot be intervened by anyone.
This was conveyed by the Criminal Law Expert of Bung Karno University (UBK), Hudi Yusuf in response to the judicial review (PK) steps filed by the convict in the IUP corruption case, Mardani H Maming. The former Chairman of the South Kalimantan PDIP DPD registered the PK on June 6, 2024, numbered 784/PAN.PN/W15-U1/HK2.2/IV/2004.
“PK must have novum (new evidence) if the argument is weak, it is appropriate that PK should not be accepted by the Supreme Court. Moreover, in the first instance court, the appeal and cassation have been lost (three zeros) meaning that the previous panel of judges must have studied the Judex facti and Judex juris that support their decision,” Hudi emphasized, Thursday (29/8).
Hudi then also reminded, the decision of the Panel of Judges to reject the judicial review or PK Mardani H Maming cannot be intervened by anyone. Hudi emphasized, the judges must be independent and cannot be intervened by anyone including the convict in making every decision that exists.
“Judges as law enforcement officers who are paid by the state should side with the state, not individuals, all for the sake of the state, especially if the perpetrators of corruption are former state officials, the sentence should be heavier than just 12 years in prison,” said Hudi.
On that occasion, Hudi highlighted the steps of the former Bendum PBNU to re-submit a PK to the Supreme Court (MA). Hudi said that often the review or PK submitted by convicts is only looking for an opportunity to free themselves.
“Most of the PK cases are just looking for an opportunity to “free” themselves by submitting novum that is linked to the facts of the trial. All evidence should have been submitted during the trial at the first level, that’s where the real “battle” is to get justice,” Hudi emphasized. (Nov)
#Novum #Deemed #Worthy #Rejecting #Mardani #Mamings
