COMMISSION III of the Indonesian House of Representatives provides recommendations regarding the acquittal of the defendant in the Dini Sera Afriyanti murder case, Ronald Tannur. Starting from the examination of the judge to the ban for Ronald.
This was conveyed when legislators received an audience from Dini’s family at the Parliament Complex, Senayan, Jakarta. The family came with a team of legal counsel.
“Commission III asks the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission to immediately examine the judges (Chairman of the Panel, Erintuah Damanik; Member, Mangapul, Heru Hanindyo) who are included in the Panel of Judges related to the case of the late Dini Sera Afriyanti (No.454/PID.B/2024/PN SBY) in accordance with statutory provisions,” said member of Commission III of the DPR Heru Widodo while reading the conclusion in the Commission III DPR meeting room, South Jakarta, Monday, July 29, 2024.
The next recommendation is to ask the Attorney General to immediately file an appeal. In addition, the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham) was asked to issue a letter of prohibition for Ronald.
“And submit a ban on Brother Gregorius Ronald Tannur to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in accordance with statutory provisions,” said Heru.
The next recommendation is for the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) to protect witnesses and victims. “Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives requires LPSK to provide protection to the families of victims and witnesses in accordance with statutory provisions,” Heru explained.
Also read: DPR Commission III: Gregorius Ronald Tannur’s Acquittal Verdict Does Not Side with the Victim
Chief Justice Erintuah Damanik acquitted defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannur of the murder charge of Dini Sera Afriyanti. The verdict was read out by Damanik during the sentencing hearing at the Surabaya District Court on Wednesday, July 24, 2024.
Damanik emphasized that the son of the PKB politician had not been proven legally and convincingly to have committed murder or assault which caused the victim’s death.
“The defendant was not proven legally and convincingly as in the first charge, Article 338 of the Criminal Code or second, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code or third, Article 359 of the Criminal Code and 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code,” said Damanik.
Also read: Ronald Tannur, Son of Former Member of the Indonesian House of Representatives, Defendant in the Murder of Dini Sera, Acquitted
In addition, Damanik asked the Public Prosecutor (JPU) to release the defendant from detention, immediately after the verdict was read. “Ordering to release the defendant immediately after this verdict is read,” he said.
Previously, Public Prosecutor (JPU) Ahmad Muzzaki demanded that the defendant be sentenced to 12 years in prison because he was considered proven in the first charge, namely Article 338 of the Criminal Code concerning murder.
(Z-9)
#DPR #Recommends #Banning #Ronald #Tannur
