Throughout this part that lasted one and a half months, the GIPL fuel pipeline connecting us with Poland and the Lithuanian-Latvian connection labored far more than ordinary. Each of those circuits efficiently accomplished the duty.
In the course of the upkeep of the terminal, fuel was equipped to Lithuania from two sources – the GIPL fuel pipeline from Poland and the fuel pipeline from Latvia. Throughout this era, regarding 650 gigawatt hours (GWh) of fuel was transmitted by the GIPL hyperlink. From 9 to 26 GWh of fuel was equipped to Lithuania per day, protecting a big a part of the nation’s day by day fuel consumption of roughly 32 GWh. The same quantity of fuel was additionally transported by the connection from Latvia.
GIPL – 500 million The challenge, which is collectively financed by the European Union and the Baltic States, is price EUR, connecting the Jauniūnai fuel compressor station in Lithuania with the Holovčycius station in Poland. This infrastructure of strategic significance built-in Lithuania and the Baltic nations into the fuel transmission system of the European Union, and in addition offered an alternative choice to the present fuel infrastructure.
The GIPL connector, which has been in operation for 2 years, has already confirmed its usefulness and reliability. Throughout this era, no technical indicators have been recorded that might permit us to doubt the reliability of the system. From the beginning of operation of GIPL in 2022 Could. it transmitted 16.7 TWh in each instructions, or virtually 11 p.c. Lithuania consumed extra fuel than in 2023.
A value distinction we did not really feel
In Could and half of June, the fuel market of the Baltic nations and Finland operated with out crucial supply of provide – the Klaipėda LNG terminal. Regardless of the disconnected terminal, fuel costs rose comparatively little in Could as a consequence of the potential of securing provides from Latvia and Poland, and the common month-to-month value distinction between completely different buying and selling flooring of the fuel alternate remained secure – it differed by simply 1 euro per MWh. On the “GET Baltic” alternate working within the Baltic States and Finland, fuel value a mean of 36.56 euros in Could, or 10 p.c. greater than in April and a couple of p.c. lower than a 12 months in the past.
Such stability was maintained as a consequence of the truth that the architects of the Lithuanian power infrastructure foresaw nicely forward and correctly constructed various provide chains. We might see what it means to not have further fuel provide infrastructure within the current incident with the Balticconnector fuel pipeline connecting Finland and Estonia.
in 2023 In October, the Balticconnector pipeline was severely broken and closed as a consequence of suspected anchor pulling by a Chinese language ship, which considerably disrupted fuel provides to Finland. Because of this incident, the fuel costs in that area elevated and it grew to become clear that counting on a single supply of fuel is kind of dangerous. At the moment, the development of the LNG terminal in Finland was already nearing completion, so the fuel provide drawback was below management.
A brief change within the fuel provide route examined the reliability of the system
The deliberate technical inspection of the principle supply of fuel provide to Lithuania – the Klaipėda LNG terminal – was carried out outdoors Lithuania. The terminal, which has been working since 2014, usually provides 70-80 p.c. fuel transported to the Lithuanian system for the wants of us and different EU nations. Technical upkeep, which is important following a decade of operation, is feasible solely within the port of Denmark – a so-called dry dock is required to service an almost 300-meter ship, and a dock of this dimension is solely not accessible in different seaports of the Baltic States.
Whereas the LNG storage vessel was being repaired, the GIPL fuel pipeline and the reference to Latvia, which operated at larger than ordinary capability, proved the energy and reliability of the Lithuanian fuel provide community. The potential for a easy transition to various sources meant that fuel costs in Lithuania remained comparatively secure, regardless of the massive operation and adjustments within the ordinary fuel provide routes. Since during the last decade now we have invested within the reconstruction of the fuel infrastructure in preparation for guaranteeing the safety of fuel provide in Lithuania, that’s the reason now we have such a variety of choices.
#Biknius #Klaipėda #LNG #terminal #Lithuania #handle #guarantee #fuel #provide #Enterprise
2024-06-24 07:41:33
