Sjødin refers back to the many petitions earlier than the now acquitted Viggo Kristiansen’s case was resumed.
– I do not assume we’re that far-off from a brand new petition if we are able to get individuals who can learn and perceive what legislation is, and may perceive what felony legislation is, says Sjødin to the press on Monday following it grew to become recognized that Per and Veronica Orderud won’t get his triple homicide case reopened.
He’s Per Orderud’s lawyer and has little doubt that the case ought to have been reopened. Sjødin fought for Viggo Kristiansen, who was convicted of infanticide in Baneheia in 2000, for twelve years earlier than he was acquitted in 2022.
– Once we sat with the Baneheia case, the proof on the desk was that Viggo Kristiansen was harmless – that there was new data that went into this – already in 2009.
Moreover, Sjødin factors out that Kristiansen needed to undergo seven petitions earlier than he had the case reopened, despite the fact that the proof was already there a few years earlier than.
– It says one thing regarding the truth that you do not cope with proof, says the Stavanger lawyer.
Sjødin says that the fee’s work on the Baneheia case was a catastrophe, and that the case is now underneath investigation. He hopes it might assist be sure that the readmission fee doesn’t make the identical errors sooner or later.
#Sjødin #religion #Orderud #case #reopened
2024-06-19 00:47:42
