The DRAFT Revision of Legislation (UU) Quantity 32 of 2002 regarding Broadcasting have to be rejected. It’s believed that adjustments to the rules that include controversial articles will solely result in a retreat into the darkish ages of the brand new order.
“Revisions to the Broadcasting Legislation have to be rejected if they don’t seem to be according to press freedom. As a result of Indonesia should not regress to the darkish ages the place the ruling regime castrated press freedom,” mentioned political communications observer from Esa Unggul College, M Jamiluddin Ritonga, to Medcom.id, Sunday, Could 26 2024.
Jamiluddin mentioned that if the revision continues, articles that battle with press freedom have to be eradicated. Particularly the article that questions investigative protection.
Efforts to get rid of investigative protection, he mentioned, are the identical as desirous to suppress press freedom. This can not occur as a result of it isn’t according to the structure and the reform mandate.
“As a result of, investigative reporting a part of the social management mandatory in a democracy. Due to that, investigative reporting “That is just like the spirit of democracy,” mentioned Jamiluddin.
The draft revision of the Legislation on Broadcasting has sparked controversy. Article 50 B paragraph 2 letter (c) is essentially the most highlighted article as a result of it accommodates rules prohibiting unique broadcasting of investigative journalism. The next reads article 50 B paragraph 2 letter (c):
“Along with containing pointers for the appropriateness of Broadcast Content material and Broadcast Content material as meant in paragraph (1), SIS accommodates prohibitions concerning:…(c.) the unique broadcast of investigative journalism. (Z-7)
#Draft #Revision #Broadcasting #Legislation #Takes #Press #Darkish #Ages
