The submit Politics as an answer appeared first on Minuto30.
There are two methods to grasp politics, as a battle or as an answer. The primary emphasizes energy and understands its axis as a struggle wherein there are at all times winners and losers, somebody who wins and somebody who should be defeated.
Though it isn’t the one one who understands politics this manner, the left, by definition, sees it as a fight. Confrontation is the logic of Marxist dialectics. Marx and Engels, within the Manifesto of the Communist Social gathering, keep that “the whole historical past of humanity so far is the historical past of sophistication wrestle.” That struggle is the rationale for politics. Marx, moreover, believes that this contest should be violent. In Capital, he says that “violence is the midwife of each outdated society that carries a brand new one in its womb.” With Lenin there may be yet another leap: violence is not solely tactical however strategic, the means to attain the “liberation” of the working class, as he argues in What to Do?.
Petro’s Marxist-Leninist mentality, hidden for a few years whereas he skilfully rose in electoral politics, has grow to be evident in these weeks, following his try and receive, one following the other and with bribes if essential, the parliamentary help he wants failed. for his or her reforms. His narrative now will not be solely brazenly confrontational however encourages “class warfare.” That is how we perceive each his more and more aggressive hate speech and the systematic disqualification of his opponents as oligarchs, slavers and exploiters or, worse, gangsters, murderers and genocides. It’s using language as an instrument of dehumanization and cancellation of the opposite, who should be defeated at any value.
Opinion
This mentality additionally explains the recurrent use of “the individuals” within the latest Petrista discourse, not as an idea that features the whole nationwide inhabitants (because the individuals are in a democracy) however solely part of it, that of minority teams and associated unions, with a category conception and ideological id. The background of the Petrist constituent course of is that of a brand new political constitution constructed by just a few, their very own, not by all. A factional structure, undemocratic, however in line with the contentious, conflictive imaginative and prescient that Petro proposes, wherein he intends to subdue those that oppose him. Every little thing for the winners, crumbs or nothing for the losers. It’s the pure consequence of the imaginative and prescient of the state, society and politics as a scene not solely of battle however of sophistication wrestle.
However Democrats shouldn’t have to undergo that emasculating, harmful and bloody imaginative and prescient. The second manner of understanding politics emphasizes the issue and its axis is to search out and develop options. In that search and its consequence, the options, there aren’t any winners or losers, all of us win, it isn’t a zero-sum recreation.
“The extra complicated societies grow to be, and the extra complicated the networks of interdependence inside and throughout the boundaries of communities and nations, the extra individuals will likely be occupied with discovering win-win options slightly than win-lose options.” […] as a result of we uncover that the extra our interdependence grows, we usually prosper when others prosper too,” stated Invoice Clinton lucidly.
On this context, what’s related in politics will not be the facility to defeat and subdue the defeated however the energy to facilitate and encourage the identification of the issues of our societies and the search and building of options (which provides particular worth to data and, due to this fact, the technocracy that Petro pursues), in addition to teamwork, cooperative and non-confrontational.
On this imaginative and prescient of politics it’s constructed, not destroyed; reforms are made, not revolutions; is included, not excluded; it’s added, not subtracted; the well-being of all is sought, not of some; Democracy is expanded and autocracies are averted. And the best way to qualify political success or failure is by evaluating whether or not the proposed and executed options resolved nicely or poorly the social and financial issues they sought to treatment. It’s the actuality of the answer that’s rewarded, not the ideological cart.
Democrats have the problem of confronting Petro, of unveiling and stopping his authoritarian drift and of getting ready for the confrontation that can emerge from the self-coup, if he decides to hold it out. However we even have the duty to supply residents proposals for options to the large issues we face and the colossal challenges that this disastrous authorities will go away us. Our responsibility is to make constructive politics, politics of options.
The submit Politics as an answer appeared first on Minuto30.
2024-05-19 14:47:04
#Politics #answer
