2024-02-19 07:56:08
Complain regarding construction Condo in the middle of the city Sunshades affecting the community Not passed EIA But it’s almost sold out.
On February 19, the reporter reported that Mr. Wat (pseudonym) filed a complaint throughMatichon Online Stated that it was affected by a condominium construction project. In the Phra Khanong area It was found that this condo had already submitted an environmental impact report (EIA) with the Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP), and despite the fact that it appears that it has not yet been considered. But it was found that the condo was open for sale. And a residential room has already been reserved. which is the result of such construction design This causes the effect that the house is obscured by the building to the point where sunlight cannot penetrate.
Mr. Wat stated through a letter of complaint that “I am writing this letter in hopes that you will be able to help and bring my story and my community to the media.” Here is a brief summary:
Started two years ago One condo has started selling. Although it has not yet passed the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the condo model used for sale It has blocked out a lot of sunlight. Until during the winter, I received only 0 hours of sunlight.
Even following the design was fixed, it still directly affected my house. which during the winter receives only one hour of sunlight (from 4 to 5 p.m.), even though the design has been revised
The condo cannot be amended further than this. Due to problems at the condo, sales have begun. And there was not even a sign of fixing the building’s architectural structure. To reduce the impact on the nearby houses that occur.
I have tried to submit my claims and grievances to the developer and relevant agencies (EIA), but no action has been taken.
This condo has applied for EIA approval three times but has not been approved all three times. After the community filed an objection But there is concern that Every condo filing document has no amendments at all. Not listening to the community It’s probably because of the quiet noise in a few houses and it seems like the officials mightn’t force the condo to change the design even though it would have an impact on the environment.
The questions and concerns I raised at the meeting were: “Why do we study EIA if we don’t fix the root cause? The condo can be passed by standing on one leg. It is very depressing that even with the EIA, it has caused additional stress and unfairness to the people.”
Continuous filing of documents of the project in this format It appears to be a strategy to hope for approval. Or until I stop objecting or missed the mission and did not participate which the agency informed that Not submitting an objection is considered acceptable in practice. This is unfair to the opposing community. Because it was noted that there was little consideration of the impact on the health and quality of life of the communities that had been reported. No regulations apply. Reduce the level of impact on quality of life such as blocking of sunlight and wind.
In my house, I have a 78-year-old mother who cannot go out and stays inside the house all day, and elementary school-aged children who are on winter break. They use sunlight for activities. I’m at the age of self-development, reading books, playing music, etc. Also, my house doesn’t have air conditioning on during the day. Life is normal and happy according to what is received naturally, there is enough light and there is a breeze all year round.
In addition, there are many different types of trees at home that another elderly person who lives at home has planted a lot. Live your life and activities at the end of your life to be happily according to your own lifestyle.
The latest clarification letter from the condo said: My house doesn’t have any impact on my health because other seasons get sunshine, which doesn’t correspond to the actual situation. The condo informs like that. It’s just not sunny during one season. It doesn’t matter.
Environmental consultants were also hired by the project owner. EIA did not bring the matter to the project owner for resolution. The last time I asked the environmental consultant that “Aren’t there going to be any corrections to the data to reduce the impact?” I was informed that “The information is complete according to the topics specified by EIA. Consideration is at the discretion of the committee.”
Even though the environmental consultant knew that the house was affected. But it seems to be comfortable to watch, as if No corrections But if it is considered possible, it will pass, becoming “complete topic, but lacks legitimacy.” I myself do not believe that I will encounter these things myself.
I hope you will help reflect this story in your media. To demand justice and proper care from relevant agencies and condo developers. For the quality of life and good health of people in our community. and is information for people in society who are facing the same story as me.
What I said There is no intention to prevent condo construction. But the report creator and project owner It should be carried out in a fair manner. And this is more accurate. Now, in addition to complaining to ONEP, I am going to complain to find justice from the Damrongdham Center as well.
Follow every situation from Line@matichon here
1708334202
#Complain #construction #Condo #middle #city #Sunshades #affecting #community #passed #EIA #sold
