North Dakota Law Change and Summit Carbon Solutions Pipeline: Legislative Questions and Public Concerns

2024-02-12 06:52:12

Submitted Photo
In a multistate project, Summit Carbon Solutions wants to capture carbon emissions from Midwestern ethanol plants and run those emissions through a maze of pipelines to be stored underground in North Dakota. (Adobe Stock photo)

BISMARCK – A North Dakota lawmaker is calling into question a state law change that drew a lot of attention this week.

At issue is a regulatory decision for a planned underground pipeline to store carbon dioxide. North Dakota’s Public Service Commission said local ordinances to set route restrictions for such projects are preempted by state rules.

At least two counties have adopted ordinances for a pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions. The company wants to transfer carbon dioxide from ethanol plants and store it underground in North Dakota.

Rep. SuAnn Olson, R-Baldwin, wonders whether recent changes to the law tied to the decision should be in place anymore.

“It was never envisioned, I’m sure, to be this far-reaching,” Olson said. “No doubt the PSC, all they can do is wrestle with what the current Century Code said. What it said to me is that the Legislature really needs to look at that, this next session.”

The Legislature is not expected to meet once more until next year, and Olson might not speak to whether a special session is necessary. Public hearings on the latest permit proposal from Summit might begin several weeks from now. The company said the project would have several benefits, including environmental. But skeptics are dubious regarding the claim and cited worries regarding safety and landowner rights.

Summit has argued the local ordinances are unreasonably restrictive and contended it will use strong safety measures. But Olson, who represents an area along the proposed route, does not feel reassured.

“If there is a breach, this pipeline is near so much population — or has the ability to touch so many people — that the route they’re proposing, north of Bismarck, is untenable, in my view,” Olson said.

After its initial permit application was denied by North Dakota regulators, the company submitted a new plan to reroute almost 10 miles north of Bismarck city limits. Summit noted it addresses concerns regarding city growth and future development. Meanwhile, an attorney representing landowners fighting the project said his team plans to appeal the Public Service Commission decision.

Today’s breaking news and more in your inbox

1707732155
#Law #scrutiny #carbon #pipeline #fight #News #Sports #Jobs

Leave a Replay