2024-01-07 01:00:04
High-cut sneakers are often used for long-term hiking. However, these days, low-cut running shoes and approach suits that resemble sneakers are also gaining popularity. Which one is better for mountain climbing or hiking?
Jeff Hester, founder of the Six-Pack of Peaks Challenge, a 314km long trail wearing running shoes (LONE PEAK 7). He emphasizes the appeal of trail running shoes as being lightweight, saying that 343g underfoot is worth the equivalent of 1,361g. Additionally, according to major outdoor specialty stores, sales of trail running shoes have increased 11% over the past five years. Trail running shoes are designed with running in mind, so they are lighter and more flexible than high-cut shoes. Another key point is that they were made with the assumption that they would be used in the mountains, and a material that is difficult to slip on the bottom of the shoe was used.
Meanwhile, an orthopedic specialist is said to have examined a patient who suffered injuries such as fractures due to wearing low-cut shoes. In addition, an official from Salomon, a large shoe manufacturer that sells a variety of shoes ranging from high-cut hiking shoes to low-cut trail running shoes, said that high-cut hiking shoes protect the feet better in places where there is vegetation and sharp rocks. It is recommended that you differentiate between trail running shoes and high-cut hiking shoes depending on the location and environment.
Trail running shoes are also used for mountaineering because they are equipped with thick cushioning and anti-slip material, but that does not mean that all low-cut shoes are good. Trying to climb a mountain using low-cut sneakers that do not have a climbing function should be avoided as it can lead to danger. Related information: this placeYou can check it here.
1704592961
#High #cut #cut #hiking
