2024-01-02 08:03:00
“The taking of images is carried out with the sole purpose of graphing the activity carried out by the institution’s staff, their presence and the correct use of the uniform,” the Argentine Naval Prefecture informed federal judge Paula Marisi, position of the presidency in the trial taking place in Neuquén for crimes committed during the military dictatorship.
The last hearing of the trial for crimes once morest humanity took place on December 15. On that occasion, the prosecutor’s office asked the court to know if it had requested the taking of images, because there was information that custody personnel had been seen filming or taking photos at the public entrance and in the premises where the hearing took place.
Judge Marisi said she was unaware of the activity and immediately requested reports. At the scene, the person in charge of custody said out loud that it was normal for the troops to film while they worked, as part of the custody work.
Security at trial It is always carried out by a federal force and until now, some of the procedures had not been observed. LThe taking of images occurred in one of the last hearings before the judicial fair and the first following the change of government and the national administration.
Prosecutor Miguel Palazzani He was upset by the procedure and made it known to the Court. In turn, Judge Marisi, far from being satisfied with the explanation, He requested the extension of the custody modality in writing and indicated that he wanted material to be attached: the photos and filming.
In the Prefecture’s defense, it was insisted that it was “internal directives” of the Prefecture custody for the security operation in the hearings of the Escuelita VIII trial.
Former judge Pedro Duarte and former prosecutor Víctor Ortiz are accused in this process for their actions in 1976 following the kidnapping and torture operations of missing detainees in the region.
Duarte and Ortiz are prosecuted for providing judicial coverage for the disappearances, without calling testimonies, nor requesting reports in procedures with witnesses, for example, of kidnapping operations.
The former judicial officials assured that they learned regarding the torments and disappearances during the return of democracy. The prosecution accused them of being part of the military regime’s task groups.
In order to avoid actions that might be questionable by the personnel involved in the security of the hearings, the taking of any type of record will be void.
From the Prefecture’s report to the Court on the reasons for taking images in the Escuelita VIII trial
The defendants were never in the courtroom, they only participated in the trial via zoom. The testimonial continuity was scheduled for February 1 and 2.
In the report sent to the Court, the Prefecture stated that the taking of images is carried out only to graph the activity carried out, giving a graphic context that is presented in the reports it submits, in particular it focused on the use of the uniform and abounded in giving “a high institutional image” in all interventions. It was clarified that they have directives to avoid including the general public in the images and if they might not be excluded, the faces are distorted so as not to be identified. Or those images are discarded if they do not match the parameters of reporting on the correct presence of the uniformed personnel.
1704184023
#Controversy #photos #Prefecture #Escuelita #trial
