2023-11-22 06:38:14
Biopic
Article reserved for subscribers
Clumsy and deliberately unworthy of its poorly crafted subject, the biopic with Joaquin Phoenix offers no point of view, neither on the man, nor on the myth.
White noise, sweat down your back, intense laziness. Want to hide your eyes in front of the cocked hat on the head of the one who interprets it (Joaquin Phoenix, American accent included and assumed), neither better nor worse than before him Marlon Brando, Albert Dieudonné, Patrice Chéreau, Christian Clavier… A film dedicated to Bonaparte and which is only called Napoléon worries: as if he aspired to sweep away all those who preceded him (more than 1000 appearances in the cinema and on television), who almost did so (Kubrick and Chaplin ) or, worse, to include in its entirety the legend, the entirety of the Memorial and the infinitely extended notional field of Napoleon in its project and its duration (two and a half hours in this theatrical version, at least two hours more in the version that we will soon see on Apple TV+).
Too much lunch
Fortunately for our little heads, Napoleon is a very small film rather than an amphibious aspirational reflection on the man, the autocrat, the nose in the middle of the figure of French political life for 202 years. Taking facts and deeds that he would not take any idolator of Bonaparte (his British nationality being proof of his de facto hostility?) and, perhaps, of such a volatile character of the character that his tombstone remains devoid of any inscription , Ridley Scott does the opposite with Napoleon in Napoleon
1700637367
#Napoleon #Ridley #Scott #crash #emperor #Libération
