2023-10-09 00:47:00
The second presidential debate that took place at the Faculty of Law of the University of Buenos Aires (UBA) began with crosses between Sergio Massa, Javier Milei, Patricia Bullrich, Juan Schiaretti y Myriam Bregman.
In that sense, who during her presentation, the candidate of Together for Change (JxC) mentioned the scandal of the former Buenos Aires Chief of Staff, Martín Insaurralde, and the model Sofía Clerici. “These two weeks we have seen the most brutal of Kirchnerist corruption. The Insaurralde yachts are like the maximum point. Argentines cannot make ends meet,” said the former Minister of Security, to which she added: “To change “There is only one way: to end the Insaurraldes and the mafias that plague this country.”
In addition to this, he targeted his rivals from Unión por la Patria (UP) and La Libertad Avanza (LLA) directly. “Massa cannot because he is part of it, he is one of them and Milei has associated with them as well. We are the only political force with the determination and capacity to change this country forever and we need your vote,” he stated.
For his part, the Minister of Economy announced that he does not come to the debate “with chicanery” or with the intention of “fighting.” “I come to propose,” he stated.
Like Bullrich, Bregman also attacked his rivals, emphasizing, indirectly, the libertarian. “The coalitions that have been governing are broken. Others propose themselves as the new thing, but they are the old disheveled right,” he said. “We must unite those from below and fight so that those who never governed govern,” he concluded in his presentation.
The crossings during the Security axis
The security block initiated the crossings between the candidates following the use of the reply button. The one who opened the axis was Bullrich, who made use of her experience as former Minister of National Security to target her rivals. “They release prisoners and today they give them internet and cell phones in the prisons. That’s why people are afraid, because they let them loose. We have things very clear: we defend the citizens, not like Kirchnerism. Milei wants to release the weapons and they They fall into the hands of criminals. My pulse does not tremble,” he said.
The changemaker’s dissertation, despite being the first of the entire debate, earned her responses from all of her opponents. The Left candidate was the first, ensuring that “you and all those who promote the iron fist have failed.” “In a decade they increased the prison population by 97%, they increased all the laws, generating penal inflation. What do they have to show? When she was a minister, her pride was to take photos in a kidnapping of 25 joints,” she began.
And he added: “Now I hear her come back from time to time with the lowering of the age of imputability. How far, 12, 10, kindergarten? We are in an election where the president is elected, not the head of the penitentiary service.” .
For his part, Milei went to the crossroads and “regretted that, as in the previous debate, (Bullrich) lies”: “Now he does it with the issue of weapons, I know that he has people who distort my messages. There is a law of weapons and what we have to do is comply with them, because it cannot be that the criminals are armed and the honest ones are not. You talked regarding eliminating laws through DNU and wearing constitutional guarantees. What do you want, for this to be a dictatorship? “
1696812852
#crossroads #presidential #debate
