2023-10-01 18:05:00
The Galaxy A04s and Moto E13 have a very similar proposal. We are talking regarding an entry-level segment, which focuses on delivering a smartphone for basic tasks at a low cost.
When we put the basic Samsung and Motorola side by side, which manufacturer has the best option in the category? The TudoCelular Comparison tells you the answer in detail now.
Samsung
19 Set
Motorola
30 Ago
Comparative index
Design and connectivity
Samsung Galaxy A04s
As we are talking regarding a very basic segment, both have a single-piece construction made entirely of plastic. And don’t expect any certification from them that guarantees resistance once morest water and dust. Still, each manufacturer chose a path to look more premium.
Samsung chose to insert a metallic appearance and the cameras aligned vertically and individually on the back. Motorola preferred a matte finish and a small square block, which makes the sensor stand out.
Motorola Moto E13
The Galaxy’s distinguishing feature is the presence of a biometric reader, which is integrated into the power button on the side. On the other hand, the Moto responds with a more compact and lighter body than its competitor. In any case, both use a teardrop-shaped notch to house the selfie lens.
Storage expansion is guaranteed in the duo, thanks to the presence of a triple drawer with a dedicated memory card slot. Fifth generation Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0 also appear on them, but no NFC for contactless payments on these cell phones.
Biometric reader for greater security on one side; more compact and lighter body than the other. We started the duel with one point each.
Better construction
None
More modern look
None
Is the slot hybrid or dedicated?
Both
Best notch solution
None
Best biometrics solution
Galaxy A04s
Best resistance certification
None
Which is more compact and lighter?
Moto E13
Tem NFC?
None
This Wi-Fi 5?
Both
More advanced Bluetooth
None
Multimedia and resources
Bodies
These devices come equipped with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD screen. In other words, don’t expect a high brightness level or great color reproduction here. Furthermore, their HD+ resolution ends up making the definition of images more limited.
The A04s and E13 also do not require any additional protection once morest scratches and do not support technologies to improve playback on streaming services. What will differentiate one from the other is the 90 Hz refresh rate present in the Korean, for more fluid animations than the rival’s only 60 Hz panel.
With the smoothest display of the duo, the Galaxy scores on this score.
Better screen technology
None
Better screen brightness
None
More colors
None
Better screen resolution
None
Bigger screen
None
Better screen-to-body ratio
Moto E13
HDR10+ support
None
High Hz screen?
Galaxy A04s
Better scratch protection
None
Overall screen quality
Galaxy A04s
As
Because they are entry-level models, manufacturers saved on audio and left only a mono system in these devices. The existence of only one speaker harms the user’s sound experience, especially when watching movies and listening to music.
The result of this is also a low sound power in the duo. Not to mention the quality that is lacking, as they do not present any balance between frequencies. The bass is muffled in them, the treble is distorted, while the midrange is almost non-existent.
At least the Galaxy and Moto still have a standard headphone jack, even if they don’t ship an accessory in the package.
Without major differences, we were tied.
Is the sound stereo?
None
Does it have P2 input?
Both
Greater frequency balance
None
Sound power
None
Does it come with headphones in the box?
None
System
The A04s comes out of the box with Android 12, but has already been awarded version 13 of the “little robot”. The E13 contains Android 13 natively. Either way, they shouldn’t provide more longevity than they already have.
Samsung put One UI Core, while Motorola used the Go Edition of Android. Both interfaces are cleaner and optimized for input hardware. In any case, the Galaxy ends up benefiting from the 90 Hz rate to give an impression of greater fluidity.
In terms of resources, the Galaxy also has Knox data encryption and some customization options, such as the brand’s theme store. In turn, the Moto only stands out for the gesture to turn on the flashlight, but the option to open the camera was not included in it.
In details, the point goes to the Korean woman.
Well updated system?
Moto E13
Will the system be updated in the future?
None
Which system or customization has the most and best features?
Galaxy A04s
Is there a 5G mobile network?
None
More fluid software
Galaxy A04s
Performance
Samsung preferred homemade hardware and inserted the Exynos 850 chip in its “cheap”, accompanied by 4 GB of RAM. On the other hand, Motorola used a Unisoc T606 to power its smartphone, along with 2 Giga of memory. Which is the fastest among them?
Our tests indicated a victory of over a minute in total for the Galaxy. Although it was slower when opening apps, the fact that it came with twice as much RAM allowed it to hold more apps in the background.
Moving on to the benchmarks, we already see the scenario changing. Moto has a slight advantage here, with a score almost 23% higher than its competitor on AnTuTu. In games, the A04s’ GPU ends up getting the better of some heavier titles. However, don’t expect great performance in games, even in Korean.
The multitasker ends up weighing more and gives the point to the Korean woman.
Who does better in the opening test?
Galaxy A04s
Who comes out on top in the most demanding games?
Galaxy A04s
Who has the best benchmark numbers?
Moto E13
What is the most up-to-date processor?
Moto E13
Which has better RAM/processor balance?
Galaxy A04s
Which has more storage?
None
Battery
As has become increasingly standard on the market, these are two more cell phones powered by a 5,000 mAh battery. Same capacity, equal autonomy, right? It’s not quite like that. The A04s came out on top in our standardized tests, clocking in at almost 25 hours total and regarding an hour and a half over the E13.
When we move to charging, what do we have in them? The 15 W adapter sent by Samsung makes the Galaxy complete the process in less than two and a half hours. A time shorter than the almost three hours that the Moto needs to reach 100%, with its only 10 W accessory.
This is an easy point for Korean.
Which one has more battery?
None
Which recharges faster?
Galaxy A04s
Which lasts longer according to TC’s battery test?
Galaxy A04s
Does it have wireless charging?
None
Cmera
The Galaxy has a photographic set consisting of a 50 MP main camera, a 2 MP macro camera and a 2 MP blur camera. On the Moto side, we only find a simple 13 megapixel sensor. An ultrawide was missing in both cases.
The Korean stands out in the photos for recording a lot of detail, vibrant colors and good contrast for the category. Unlike the E13, which has a very limited dynamic range and captures images with very dark shadows. This is the only one to include a night mode, but the high amount of noise doesn’t make the scenes better than the A04s’ night photographs.
And speaking of the Samsung cell phone, its macro depends on favorable light to get it right and suffers from low resolution. The blur lens is good for the category and has few errors.
For the superior set, the Galaxy takes the point.
Best rear camera setup
Galaxy A04s
Best daytime photos
Galaxy A04s
Best night photos
Galaxy A04s
Most versatile set
Galaxy A04s
Best ultrawide
None
Best telephoto lens
None
Best macro
Galaxy A04s
Better depth
Galaxy A04s
Photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy A04s
Both record videos only in Full HD resolution at 30 fps. The overall quality of the Korean is a little higher, thanks to the agile focus and stereo sound capture, features that are not present in the Moto. None of these devices have a stabilization system to deal with tremors.
It’s another point for Samsung.
Does it have optical stabilization?
None
Does it have electronic stabilization?
None
Agile focus
Galaxy A04s
Does it record in 4K?
None
Better audio capture
Galaxy A04s
Better video quality
Galaxy A04s
Photos taken with the Motorola Moto E13
Both smartphones come with a simple 5 MP front camera. They even take good selfies during the day and don’t disappoint in portrait mode, but the Moto leaves the images too saturated and ends up killing details that are more visible in the Galaxy’s records. At night, both cannot stop the drop in sharpness and the presence of a lot of noise. The footage from the front is also nothing more than Full HD.
The A04s scores another point.
Best front camera set
None
Front camera records in 4K?
None
Best daytime selfie
Galaxy A04s
Best night selfie
None
priests
These devices were officially launched in Brazil by their respective manufacturers. The Galaxy A04s arrived in the country for a suggested price of R$1,300, more expensive than the R$1,000 initially charged for the Moto E13. In the current market, the difference between them has decreased, with the Korean model costing around R$650, while the Motorola model already costs around R$570.
As any economy has an impact on the consumer’s pocket, E13 closes the Comparison with the last point.
Which had the best launch price in Brazil?
Moto E13
Which has the lowest current cost?
Moto E13
7
Hardware
8.7
Cost Benefit
Samsung Galaxy A04s Compare
Motorola Moto E13 Compare
Finished
In this entry-level segment confrontation, Samsung proved to be far superior to Motorola. The Galaxy A04s has a biometric reader for greater security, has a more fluid screen, offers more system resources, is the fastest in multitasking performance and provides a battery with greater autonomy and shorter recharge time. Not to mention its best quality cameras in all aspects.
On the other hand, the only positive point for Motorola is that it has a more compact and lighter design, in addition to its cheaper price in national retail. However, it’s worth weighing up whether it’s worth paying so little less and foregoing all the benefits you’ll find with the Korean rival.
RESULT
Samsung Galaxy A04s: 9 POINTS
Design with biometric reader 90 Hz screen Mono sound and with P2 connector System with greater fluidity and better features Better multitasking performance Battery with longer autonomy and faster recharge Rear cameras with better colors and contrast during the day Videos with more agile focus and video capture stereo sound Selfies with more details during the day
Motorola Moto E13: 3 POINTS
More compact and lightweight design Mono sound with P2 connector Lowest price in the current Brazilian market
Do you consider the distance between them to be as great as the score indicated? Which one would be more rewarding in your opinion? You can speak freely in the space below.
(updated on October 1, 2023, at 19:34)
1696205346
#Galaxy #A04s #Moto #E13 #cheap #cell #phone #option #Comparative
