2023-09-21 13:17:00
“Piyabutr” prepares Live to criticize the Supreme Court’s judgment. In the case of Pannika Wanich, 5 points of criticism, 2 consequences of the verdict, 2 suggestions were identified. “Dr. New” slammed “Rome” for speaking too much. “Chor” was disqualified for life. Stronger than the punishment of imprisonment
Very interesting today (21 Sep. 2023) Facebook page Piyabutr Saengkanokkul – Piyabutr Saengkanokkul of Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, Secretary-General of the Faculty of Progress. Post a publicity photo with a message stating:
“[ไลฟ์ วิจารณ์คำพิพากษาศาลฎีกา กรณีพรรณิการ์ วานิช]
Criticize the Supreme Court’s judgment at Khom Chor 5/2023 in the Pannika Wanich case.
5 points of criticism
2 Consequences of the judgment
2 suggestions
Live on my page on Friday, September 22 at 12:00 noon.”
At the same time, as a result of Mr. Rangsiman Rome, MP for the Kao Klai Party, giving an interview regarding the Supreme Court’s ruling. Ms. Pannika Wanich or “Cho” withdraws her right to apply for election. and has no right to hold political office for life, that this is a political death sentence It’s a difficult thing to accept. He was severely disappointed with what had happened. If it is determined that there is some behavior that violates any section of the Criminal Code. And then coming to prosecute ethics cases, it’s still understandable. But in this case, there are no such facts at all. Prosecution once morest Miss Pannika The law is written broadly.
I don’t know if deleting a post is an act of refraining or not. The law must be clear regarding what should and should not be done. Relying on ethical standards and setting a broad framework causing the case to have severe consequences Too difficult to bear I would like to appeal to those in the justice process that Don’t be complacent. People who disagree with Ms. Pannika It’s still hard to accept. which had previously complained to the Judiciary Committee that a judge had committed a serious misconduct Until today there has been no progress.
The charges I complained regarding were much more severe. What are the standards? What is fairness? Or, finally, is it because the party has advanced? It’s because Khun Chor is a former member of the Future Forward Party. Therefore, it may lead to such severe action.
Most recently, Dr. Suphanat Apinyan or “Dr. New”, a researcher under the MAST Center Research Institute and the Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA. Post a message stating:
“Khun Chor has been revoked the right to run for election. But general political rights still exist. Khun Chor himself has always been active in the name of the Progress Party. The fact that Mr. Rome came out to invent a discourse that Arresting Chor and imprisoning him is less severe than disqualifying him for life. Therefore, it is a very disastrous use of logic. If you don’t believe me, try asking Khun Chor. Would you be interested in going to prison instead?”
1695303674
#finished #Piyabutr #prepares #live #criticize #courts #decision #case #Chor #slams #Rome #Disqualification #severe #imprisonment
